The Philosophical problem of moral universalization
Keywords:Kant, Moral Universalism, Categorical Imperative
This piece examines some kantian arguments with the intent on considering Universality as a must of Moral Philosophy and to see if Kant`s studies can contribute to clarify this theme. The analysis of the arguments shows some logical inconsistencies in the solution given to the problem of Moral Universalization. Since this problem has been treated by specialists, this paper, considering their approaches, suggests that a Wittgenstein style of Grammatical Analysis is an alternative to clarify this matter. The paper, therefore, in part criticizes and in part has a proposal and implies a Programmatic Interpretation of some of Kant`s thesis.
ALARCON, C. Lógica deóntica. En: Frápolli, M.J. (coord.). Filosofía de la lógica. Tecnos, Madrid, 2007, pp. 207-231.
CHADWICK, R. (ed.). Immanuel Kant, Critical Assessments. Vol. 3. Routledge, London/New York, 1998.
GADAMER, H-G. Verdad y método. Vol 1. Trad. de Ana Agud y Rafael de Agapito. Sígueme, Salamanca, 2001.
HEGEL, G. W. F. Fenomenología del espíritu. Trad. de Wenceslao Roces. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1966.
KANT, I. Fundamentación para una metafísica de las costumbres. Trad. de Roberto Rodríguez Aramayo. Alianza, Madrid, 2002.
KÖRNER, S. Kant. Trad. de Ignacio Zapata. Alianza, Madrid, 1977.
PATZIG, G. Las formas lógicas de las proposiciones prácticas en la ética de Kant. En: Ética sin metafísica. Trad. de Ernesto Garzón. Alfa, Buenos Aires, 1971, pp. 98-122.
RAWLS, J. Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. En: Chadwick (ed.). Immanuel Kant, Critical Assessments. Vol. 3, Routledge, London/New York, 1998, pp. 11-41.
RAWLS, J. Lecciones sobre la historia de la filosofía moral. Trad. de Andrés de Francisco. Paidós, Barcelona, 2001.
ROSAS, A. Universalización moral y prudencia en Kant. En: Ideas y Valores. Bogotá, núm. 102, diciembre de 1996, pp. 104-111.
SIMON, J. El problema del lenguaje en Hegel. Trad. de Ana Agud. Taurus, Madrid, 1982.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.