Parrot’s language, difference and Being
Keywords:Aristotle, psittacism, difference, being
This article examines, first, Aristotelian developments regarding the phenomenon of psittacism (the useless repetition of words and expressions), such as those exposed in Sophist Refutations. Second, these analysis are used to clear up the argument proposed in Metaphysics B according to which being is not a genre.
BALME, D. M (1987). Aristotle’s biology was not essentialist, en: GOTTHELF, A. y LENNOX, J. G. (eds). Philosophical issues in Aristotle's biology. Cambrigde, p. 291-312.
BARNES, J. (1993). Posterior Analytics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
BERTI, E. (2002). Being and Essence in Contemporary Interpretations of Aristotle, en: BOTTANI, A. et al. (eds). Individuals, Essence and Identity. Themes of Analytic Metaphysics. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 79-107.
BRUNSCHWIG, J. (1967). Topiques (livres I-IV). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
DORION, L.-A. (1995). Les refutations sophistiques. Paris: Vrin.
FALCON, A. (1996). Aristotle’s Rules of Division in the Topics: The Relationship between Genus and Differentia in a Division, en: Ancient Philosophy 16, p. 377-387.
GRANGER, H. (1981). The Differentia and theper se Accident in Aristotle, en: Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 63, p. 118-29.
GRANGER, H. (1992). Aristotle on Genus and Differentia, en: PREUSS, Anthony and ANTON, John P. (eds). Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Albany (NY): State University ofNew York Press, Vol. 5: Aristotle s Ontology, p. 69-94.
JAEGER, W. (1960). Metaphysica. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
ROSS, W.D. (1924). Aristotle's Metaphysics, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
ROSS, W.D. (1958). Aristotelis Tópica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford:, Clarendon Press.
SHIELD, C. (1999). Order in multiplicity. Homonymy in the Philosophy o f Aristotle, (Oxford Aristotle Studies). Oxford: Clarendon Press
WAITZ, T. (1844-46). Aristotelis Organon Graece, 2 vols. Leipzig: Hahn.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.