Remarks on the concept of phenomenological destruction in Martin Heidegger. One hundred years after the lectures of 1919-1920
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n61a04Keywords:
phenomenology, Heidegger, Husserl, meaningfulness, destruction, AbbauAbstract
This article examines the genesis of the concept of destruction in the early lectures of Martin Heidegger between 1919 and 1920. The article claims that, by analyzing the phenomenological framework from which that concept arises, it is possible to reach a better understanding of Heidegger’s philosophical work and its relevance today. The article traces some of the sources of this concept, in particular with reference to Husserl’s concept of Abbau. Subsequently, the paper studies the articulation in the lectures of 1919 and 1920, and finally it puts forward some critical remarks.
Downloads
References
Bambach, C. R. (1995). Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Barash, J. A. (1994). Heidegger’s Ontological ‘Destruction’ of Western Intellectual Traditions. In T. Kisiel & J. Van Buren (Eds.), Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in his Earliest Thought (pp. 111-122). New York: SUNY.
Bedoya, C. A. (2017). Recuperar la vida. Hermenéutica y destrucción en el joven Heidegger (1919-1923). Medellín: Editorial UPB.
Bedoya, C. A & Guardia, A. (2018). Vida e historia: La presencia de la Segunda intempestiva de Nietzsche en la hermenéutica temprana de Heidegger. Escritos 26(57), 369-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.18566/escr.v26n57.a06
Carr, D. (1974). Phenomenology and the Problem of History. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Courtine, J. F. (2011). Reducción, construcción, destrucción. De un diálogo entre tres: Natorp, Husserl, Heidegger. En A. Rocha (Ed.), Heidegger hoy. Estudios y perspectivas (pp. 21-41). Buenos Aires: Grama Ediciones.
Crowe, B. D. (2006). Heidegger's Religious Origins. Destruction and Authenticity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Crowell, S. G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger and the Space of Meaning. Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
De Lara, F. (2009). Fenomenología y dialéctica. La crítica de Heidegger a la dialéctica. En A. Rocha (Ed.), Martin Heidegger. La experiencia del camino (pp. 95-123). Barranquilla: Ediciones Uninorte.
De Lara, F. (2014). ¿Ciencia originaria o ciencia del origen? Una discusión de la filosofía de Heidegger en sus cursos de 1919 a 1921. Revista de Humanidades, 30, 55-75.
De Lara, F. (2016). ¿Fenomenología de lo Concreto? Crítica Fenomenológico-Política del Programa Filosófico de Heidegger en 1919/20. Trans/Form/Ação, 39(1), 37-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732016000100003
Derrida, J. (1989). Carta a un amigo japonés. Suplementos Anthropos, 13, 86-89.
Evans, I. C. (1990). Phenomenological Deconstruction: Husserl's Method of Abbau. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 21(1), 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1990.11006874
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Autopresentación de Hans-Georg Gadamer (1977). En Verdad y método II (M. Olasagasti, Trad.). Salamanca: Sígueme.
Gander, H.-H. (2008). La fenomenología hermenéutica del vivir fáctico de Heidegger. En F. Duque (Ed.), Heidegger. Sendas que vienen. (F. de Lara, Trad.) (pp. 139-171). Madrid: Círculo de bellas Artes.
Gander H-H. (Ed.). (2010). Husserl-Lexikon. Darmstadt: WBG.
Gander, H-H. (2017). Self Understanding and Lifeworld. Basic Traits of a Phenomenological Hermeneutics. (R. Drake & J. Rayman, Trad.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gasché, P. (1986). The Tain of the Mirror. Derrida and the Philosophy Reflection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Garcés Ferrer, R. (2018). El concepto de motivación en la fenomenología hermenéutica del joven Heidegger. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 35(2), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASHF.59663
Grondin, J. (1995). Sources of Hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY.
Gutiérrez, C. B. (1998). La hermenéutica temprana de Heidegger. Ideas y valores, 47(107), 27-42.
Heidegger, M. (1987). Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag. [GA 56/57].
Heidegger, M. (1993). Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks. Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. [GA 59].
Heidegger, M. (2000). Anotaciones a la Psicología de las visiones del mundo de Karl Jaspers. En Hitos (H. Cortés & A. Leyte, Trads.). Madrid: Alianza. [GA 9].
Heidegger, M. (2003). Ser y tiempo. (J. E. Rivera, Trad.). Madrid: Trotta.
Heidegger, M. (2005a). La idea de la filosofía y el problema de la concepción del mundo. (J. Adrián Escudero, Trad.). Barcelona: Herder. [GA 56/57].
Heidegger, M. (2005b). Introducción a la fenomenología de la religión. (J. Uscatescu, Trad.). Madrid: Siruela. [GA 60].
Heidegger, M. (2013). Problemas fundamentales de la fenomenología (1919/1920). (F. de Lara, Trad.). Madrid: Alianza. [GA 58].
Hogemann, F. (1988). Vida y alienación. Sobre la fenomenología de Heidegger a principios de los años veinte. En F. Duque (Ed.), Los confines de la modernidad (pp. 147-169). Barcelona: Ediciones Juan Granica.
Husserl, E. (1980). Experiencia y juicio. Investigaciones acerca de la genealogía de la lógica (J, Reuter Trad.). México: UNAM.
Husserl, E. (1995). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. (J. Gaos, Trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Husserl, E. (2002). Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers [Mat IV].
Husserl, E. (2004). Einleitung in die Ethik, Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920/1924. Dordrecht: Springer. [Hua XXXVII].
Kisiel. T. (2010). Hermeneutics of facticity. In B. W. Davis (Ed.). Martin Heidegger: Key Concepts (pp. 17-32). Durham: Acumen.
Moran, D. (1994). The Destruction of the Destruction: Heidegger's Versions of the History of Philosophy. In K. Harries & C. Jamme (Eds.), Martin Heidegger: Politics, Art and Technology (pp. 175-196). New York: Homes and Meier.
Rodríguez, R. (1997). La transformación hermenéutica de la fenomenología. Una interpretación de la obra temprana de Heidegger. Madrid: Tecnos.
Segura Peraita, C. (2002). Hermenéutica de la vida humana. En torno al Informe Natorp de Martin Heidegger. Madrid: Trotta.
Staiti, A. (2010). Different Worlds and Tendency to Concordance: Towards a New Perspective on Husserl’s Phenomenology of Culture. In The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 10 (pp. 127-142). New York: Routledge.
Staiti, A. (2014). Husserl´s Transcendental Phenomenology. Nature, Spirit and Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Buren, J. (1994a). The Young Heidegger. Rumor of the Hidden King. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Van Buren, J. (1994b). Martin Heidegger, Martin Luther. In T. Kisiel & J. Van Buren (Eds.), Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in his Earliest Thought (pp. 159-174). New York: SUNY.
Vigo, A. (2008). Arqueología y Aleteiología y otros estudios heideggerianos. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Xolocotzi, Á. (2016). Mundo circundante y mundo de vida en 1919. Contexto de la confrontación entre Husserl y Heidegger. En Heidegger-Husserl. Studia Heideggeriana Vol V (pp. 75-100). Buenos Aires: Teseo-Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Heideggerianos.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Arturo Bedoya Rodas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.