From aesthetics as critique to grammars of listening: aesthetic resistance to epistemic violence (autobiographical essay)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.349487Keywords:
aesthetics, critique, grammars of listening, trauma, decoloniality, memoryAbstract
This paper presents an overview of my work in philosophy from my first book on Friedrich Schiller and the political sublime to my most recent project on listening to traumatic forms of violence. Starting with a reflection on the autobiographical character of philosophy, I propose to take up the question of an aesthetic dimension of philosophical critique, where aesthetics is understood as an always already embodied perspective on the world, on truth, and on philosophical activity, as well as an always already political realm, where the distribution of sense pre-determines our approach and articulation of experience. Departing from aesthetics understood and deployed as critique, the paper moves on to ask about the specific frameworks of sense or grammars that determine in advance the conditions of audibility in the realms of memory-building and history-making—particularly in those contexts where historical, political, and institutional forms of violence produce silencing and erasure. Putting in dialogue the latter with decolonial studies, I (re)interpret “traumatic violence” as a colonizing form of violence, understanding that one of its central aspects is that it is not only an assault on life but on the conditions of production of sense that make life legible as such. In this context, my project on grammars of listening seeks to carefully unpack these complex intersections while also explaining why I believe that a radical form of listening is an essential subversive/imaginative strategy against traumatic/colonial violence.
Downloads
References
Acosta López, M.R. (2006). Silencio y arte en el romanticismo alemán. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Acosta López, M.R. (2008). La tragedia como conjuro: el problema de lo sublime en Friedrich Schiller. Universidad Nacional de Colombia/Universidad de los Andes.
Acosta López, M.R. (2014). Memory and fragility: art’s resistance to oblivion (three Colombian cases). New Centennial Review, 14(1), 71-98. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.14.1.0071
Acosta López, M.R. (2016a). The resistance of beauty. On Schiller’s Kallias briefe in response to Kant’s aesthetics. Epoché, 21(1), 235-49. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche20169173
Acosta López, M.R. (2016b). Las fragilidades de la memoria. Duelo y resistencia al olvido en el arte colombiano (Muñoz, Salcedo, Echavarría). En Grupo Ley y Violencia (Eds.), Memoria y arte en Colombia: resistencias al olvido (pp. 23-48). Universidad de los Andes.
Acosta López, M.R. (2017). Hacia una gramática del silencio: Benjamin y Felman. En C. de Gamboa y M.V. Uribe (Eds.), Los silencios de la guerra (pp. 85-116). Universidad del Rosario. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zxsksg.5
Acosta López, M.R. (2018a). The violence of reason: Schiller and Hegel on the French Revolution. En M.R. Acosta López y J. Powell (Eds.), Aesthetic reason and imaginative freedom: Friedrich Schiller and philosophy (pp. 59-82). SUNY Press.
Acosta López, M.R. (2018b). Tras los rastros de Macondo: archivo, memoria e historia en Musa Paradisíaca de José Alejandro Restrepo. Estudios de Filosofía, 58, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.n58a03
Acosta López, M.R. (2018c). La narración y la memoria de lo inolvidable. Un comentario al ensayo “El narrador” de Walter Benjamin. En M.M. Andrade (Ed.), Walter Benjamin, aquí y ahora (pp. 175-96). Universidad de Los Andes.
Acosta López, M.R. (2019a). On the poetical nature of philosophical writing: a controversy about style between Schiller and Fichte. En C. Bambach & T. George (Eds.), Philosophers and their poets: the poetic turn in German philosophy since Kant (pp. 21-45). SUNY Press.
Acosta López, M.R. (2019b). From critique of the postcolony to a postcolonial form of critique.
Revista de Estudios Sociales, 67, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.7440/res67.2019.02
Acosta López, M.R. (2019c). One hundred years of forgotteness: aesth-ethics of memory in Latin America, Philosophical Readings, XI(3), 163-171. [traducido al español como Acosta López, M.R. (2020) Tras cien años de olvido: la literatura y el arte como resistencia a las borraduras de la historia. En I. Ferber, A. Messina, y A. Potestá (Eds.), Escribir la violencia: hacia una gramática del grito (pp. 57-78). Metales pesados]
Acosta López, M.R. (2019d). Gramáticas de la escucha: aproximaciones filosóficas a la construcción de memoria histórica. Ideas y Valores, 68(5), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n5Supl.80519
Acosta López, M.R. (2020a). On an aesthetic dimension of critique: the time of the beautiful in Schiller’s aesthetic letters. En M.R. Acosta López y J.C. McQuillan (Eds.), Critique in German Philosophy (pp. 89-110). SUNY press.
Acosta López, M.R. (2020b). Gramáticas de la escucha como gramáticas descoloniales: apuntes para una descolonización de la memoria. Eidos, 34, 14-40. https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.34.415 [traducido al inglés por Julian Rios-Acuña y actualizado como Acosta López, M.R. Gramáticas de lo inaudito as Decolonial Grammars: notes for a Decolonization of Listening. Research in Phenomenology, 52(2) (2022) 203-222
Acosta López, M.R. (2020c). Perder la voz propia: de una fenomenología feminista de la voz a una aproximación a la violencia política desde la escucha. L. Cadahia y A. Carrasco Conde (Eds.) Fuera de sí mismas. Motivos para dislocarse. Herder.
Acosta López, M.R. (2021a). From aesthetics as critique to grammars of listening: on reconfiguring sensibility as a political project (autobiographical essay). Journal of World Philosophies, 6, 139–156.
Acosta López, M.R. (2021b). El arte como resistencia a lo inaudito: sobre Fragmentos de Doris Salcedo y Duelos de Clemencia Echeverri. En R. Parrini y M.V. Uribe (Eds.), La violencia y su sombra. Reflexiones desde Colombia y México (pp. 227-265). Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana y Universidad del Rosario. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1k76hxt.10
Acosta López, M.R. (2021c). Gramáticas de la escucha, gramáticas de la interpelación: hacia un abordaje filosófico del trauma y de la memoria en conversación con el trabajo de Cathy Caruth. En R. Martínez (Ed.), Deconstrucción y psicoanálisis: ensayos sobre lo psicopolítico (pp. 257-269). Akal.
Acosta López, M.R. (2021d). On the (im)possibility of listening to oneself (texto presentado con y comentado por Ilit Ferber en el contexto del seminario internacional Violence in Philosophy and Literature VII, “Isolation,” Universidad de Tel-Aviv, Noviembre 19).
Acosta López, M.R. (Ed.). (2022). Memory work in Colombia: past and present experiences, legacies for the future, World Humanities Report: South America (CHCI).
Acosta López, M.R. (en preparación). Gramáticas de lo inaudito: pensar la memoria después del trauma. Herder.
Arendt, H. (1974). Los orígenes del totalitarismo. Taurus.
Bargu, B. (2014). Sovereignty as erasure. Rethinking enforced disappearances. Qui Parle: Critical
Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(1), 35-75. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.23.1.0035 Benjamin, W. (1982). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. En Discursos
interrumpidos (pp. 17-59). Taurus.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220p4w
Butler, J. (2007). El género en disputa: el feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Paidós.
Butler, J. (2010). Marcos de la guerra: las vidas lloradas. Paidós.
Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: trauma, narrative and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Caruth, C. (2013). Literature in the ashes of history. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Caruth, C. (2014). Listening to trauma. Conversations with leaders in the theory and treatment
of catastrophic experience. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Colmenares, C. y Vergara, I. (2020). Debate. Gramáticas de la escucha. Ideas y Valores, 68(5),
–83. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v68n5Supl.81467
Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26(2),
-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01177.x
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Richard Philcox (Trans.). Grove Press.
Felman, S. (2002). The juridical unconscious. Trials and traumas in the twentieth century. Harvard University Press.
Freud, S. (1976). Más allá del principio del placer. En Obras completas Vol. 18. Amorrortu. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Glissant, E. (1997). Poetics of relation de Glissant. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10257
Grupo de Memoria Histórica (2013). Basta ya. Colombia memorias de guerra y dignidad. Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica.
Gualdrón, M. (2019a). To ‘stay where you are’ as a decolonial gesture: Glissant’s philosophy of Antillean space in the context of Césaire and Fanon. In J.D. Webb, R. Westmaas, M. del Pilar Kaladeen, & W. Tantam (Eds.), Memory, migration and (de)colonisation in the Caribbean and beyond (pp. 133- 51), University of London Press.
Gualdrón, M. (2019b). Transversality as disruption and connection: on the possibilities and limits of using the framework of trauma in Glissant’s Philosophy of Caribbean history. Philosophical Readings, 11(3), 152–62.
Hartman, S. (2007). Lose your mother: a journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Karera, A. (2022). Frantz Fanon and the future of critical phenomenology in an Anti-Black world. Philosophy Today (en prensa)
Marriott, D. (2018). Whither Fanon? Studies in the blackness of being. Stanford University Press. Martínez Ruiz, R. (2020). Collective working-through of trauma or psychoanalysis as a political
strategy. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-020-00198-x Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance. Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
Paris, W. (Forthcoming). Looking for tomorrow in yesterday: black critical theory and the epistemology of utopia.
Pérez, J.D. (2018). Hacia una (re)vocalización del trauma: una crítica a Caruth desde la ética de la escucha. Perífrasis, 9(18), 117-33. https://doi.org/10.25025/perifrasis20189.18.07
Pérez, J.D. (2019). Sonorous rubble, mourning affect. In C. Echeverri (Ed.), Duelos (pp. 67-79). Museo Nacional.
Richard, N. (2007). Fracturas de la memoria. Arte y pensamiento crítico. Siglo XXI.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2018). Un mundo chi’xi es posible: Ensayos desde un presente en crisis.
Tinta Limón.
Schiller, F. (1999). Kallias. Cartas sobre la educación estética del hombre (edición bilingüe). J. Feijoó y J. Seca (Trads.). Anthropos.
Wynter, S. (1992). Rethinking aesthetics: notes towards a deciphering practice. In Ex-hiles: essays on Caribbean cinema (pp. 237-80). Africa World Press.
Zambrana, R. (2018). Pasarse políticamente: interrupting neoliberal temporality. Diacríticos 46(2), 98-.116. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2018.0011
Zambrana, R. (2021). Colonial debts. The case of Puerto Rico. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478013198
Zornosa, L. (2022, en prensa). How we remember: memory work in Chicago and Colombia. In M.R. Acosta López (Ed.), Memory work in Colombia: past and present experiences, legacies for the future. World Humanities Report: South America (CHCI).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 María del Rosario Acosta López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercia-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
5. Authors are permitted, and Estudios de Filosofía promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Estudios de Filosofía's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Estudios de Filosofía.
