Journal Information

Journal ID (publisher-id): ikala

Title: Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura

Abbreviated Title: Íkala

ISSN (print): 0123-3432

Publisher: Escuela de Idiomas, Universidad de Antioquia

Article Information

DOI: 10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n01a02

Who’s educating the teacher educators? The role of self-study in teacher education practices (S-STEP) in advancing the research on the professional development of second language teacher educators and their pedagogies *

Judy Sharkey**
 

Ph. D. in Curriculum and Instruction, Pennsylvania State University, U.S. Associate Professor and Associate Director, Teacher Education Program, University of New Hampshire, U.S. Mailing address: UNH Manchester, Office 330, 88 Commercial Street, Manchester, NH 03101, U.S. E-mail: judy.sharkey@unh.edu University of New Hampshire Teacher Education Program University of New Hampshire Manchester USA judy.sharkey@unh.edu

“While we are making gains in building that specialized knowledge base for teacher preparation and professional development, we have neglected the study of teacher educators. The assumption that a good teacher will become a good teacher educator is prevalent in the field but has not been systematically examined”. (Knight, Lloyd, Arbaugh, Gamson, McDonald & Nolan, 2014, p. 268).

The assumption that Knight and her colleagues share should sound familiar to many second language teachers. A long-standing popular myth that requires constant debunking is the superiority of the native-speaker in second language teaching and learning. Decades of scholarship, both empirical and conceptual (e.g., Braine, 1999; Davies, 1991; Phillipson, 1992) have effectively discredited the assumption that proficiency in the target language (native speaker or not) is all that is required to be a good language teacher. Have we done enough to challenge this assumption as it applies to second language teacher educators? The words of Knight and her colleagues (2014) are from a special issue of the Journal of Teacher Education, and were addressed to the general teacher education research community -across all disciplines. In this brief essay, I wish to raise this call specifically for second language teacher education (SLTE). I provide a short rationale and argue that self-study in teacher education practices (S-STEP) offers one strong yet under-utilized response.

The professional development of second language teacher educators

The collection of articles in this issue of Íkala, dedicated to SLT professional development, is testament to the valuable role that SLT educators, professionals who work at the nexus of theory and practice, play in contributing to the knowledge base and in improving classroom practice. It is true that teacher learners often rely heavily on the ways in which they were taught when developing their own practices (Lortie, 1975), but their knowledge of theories, methods, and policies are also mediated through their teacher education programs and instructors. Despite the critical role of teacher educators, we lack robust scholarship on how second language teacher educators develop -as scholar practitioners, as researchers and the implications for teacher learning (Borg, 2015; Peercy & Sharkey, forthcoming; Wright, 2010). Over the last fifteen plus years, publications on SLTE, whether handbooks (e.g., Burns & Richards, 2009), reviews of the research (e.g., Wright, 2010) and/or approaches to SLTE (e.g., Freeman, 2016; Johnson, 2009; Johnson & Golombek, 2016) highlight issues, processes, conceptual frameworks, and typical practices (e.g., reflective practice; classroom inquiry; peer collaborations), etc., but with little attention paid to the role of the language teacher educator.

In their paradigm-shifting article of twenty years ago, Freeman and Johnson (1998) called for a reconceptualization of the knowledge base for second language teacher education (SLTE) placing teachers as learners and as learners of teaching as central to SLTE. A strong strand throughout the special topic issue of TESOL Quarterly that Freeman and Johnson edited, was the valuing of teachers’ voices, perspectives and processes in their learning and articulation of their learning. We need to apply similar thinking to the professional development of SLT educators; to focus on second language teacher educators as learners and professionals who must often “blur the lines between analysis and action, inquiry and experience, theorizing and doing teacher education” (Cochran-Smith, 2005, p. 2) and whose scholarship of practice creates and opens for examination the pedagogy of SLTE.

The role of S-STEP

Epistemologically and methodologically consistent with this view of teacher educators is Self-Study in Teacher Education Practices (S-STEP), a type of practitioner inquiry undertaken by teacher educators with the dual purpose of improving their practice while also acknowledging their role in teacher learning and the larger project of preparing high quality teachers. S-STEP has its roots in action research and reflective practice, particularly from a critical, social justice perspective (Vanassche & Kelchtermans, 2015). S-STEP has been recognized as making an important contribution to the scholarship of teacher education pedagogies and practices (Loughran, 2014; Zeichner, 2007). To be clear, I am not claiming that S-STEP is the only research genre or the best one to address the call put forth by Knight et al. (2014) and others, but it is one I hope Íkala readers will consider as they pursue further research on SLTE professional development.

Internationally, S-STEP has gained legitimacy and acceptance as a research genre in the general education research community as witnessed by publications in influential, peer-reviewed research journals (Review of Educational Research; Journal of Teacher Education of Australia; Teaching and Teacher Education; Educational Research; Journal of Teacher Education); an expanding collection of methodology books (see, e.g., Lassonde, Galman, & Kosnik, 2009; Loughran, Hamilton, LaBoskey, & Russell, 2004); and, in 2004, the creation of a peer-reviewed journal,Studying Teacher Education, solely dedicated to S-STEP. However, S-STEP is relatively absent from the applied linguistics/SLTE journals and monographs (Peercy & Sharkey, forthcoming; Sharkey & Peercy, forthcoming). This absence is a bit surprising given the strong strands of reflective practice, critical literacies/pedagogies, teacher identity, the promotion of more inclusive, expansive research methodologies within SLTE, and the recent calls for more empirical research in SLTE (e.g., Barkhuizen, 2016; Canagarajah, 2016; Farrell, 2013; Johnson, 2015; Hawkins & Norton, 2009). It is beyond the scope of this essay to delve deeper into the rationale for this gap in the SLTE literature but I encourage Íkala readers new to S-STEP to explore this area of research.

Readers may still be wondering what a S-STEP perspective adds to the research on or knowledge base of second language teacher professional development. One critical contribution is a line of questioning that accompanies interpretation of any empirical study or reflective essay that focuses on a particular practice or recommended intervention. A S-STEPer always raises questions regarding the role of the of the teacher educator when considering the purported impact of a focus practice or intervention (e.g., the effectiveness of a professional learning community; the practice of socializing teacher learners into a research incubator). If we acknowledge that the teacher educator mediates teacher learning, we need to consider who that teacher educator is, how his/her philosophy, ideology, experience, social identity, and pedagogical expertise, affect the implementation of a particular practice. Similar to Freeman and Johnson’s (1998) focus on the role of the language teacher as a learner of teaching, teacher educators are learners of SLTE. S-STEP invites and values the teacher educator voice in these inquiries. Two examples from this issue include Ana María Sierra’s study on the impact of a school-based professional learning community on one teacher, and José Vicente Abad and Linda Katherine Pineda’s reflection on their mentor-mentee relationship. As a S-STEPer I would argue that Ana María’s skill as a facilitator of a professional learning community (PLC) is an important factor in understanding the impact of the PLC on Marcela’s development. In a similar vein, I see José Vicente Abad’s mentoring style and abilities as crucial to Linda Katherine Pineda’s experience in the semillero.

Closing

Not every study on professional development requires or even benefits from a S-STEP perspective. Several articles in this issue provide valuable insights into teacher knowledge/beliefs of a particular topic or area (e.g., Frank Giraldo’s needs assessment on teacher’s beliefs and practices in assessment). S-STEP does not replace or super-cede other research genres. However, I hope that readers interested in the larger topic of professional development within SLT will consider S-STEP when they begin to address the crucial, necessary question regarding the professional development of SLT educators.

References

1 

Barkhuizen, G. (2016). Reflections on language teacher identity research. New York: Routledge.

G. Barkhuizen2016Reflections on language teacher identity researchNew YorkRoutledge

2 

Borg, S. (2015). Researching language teacher education. In B. Paltridge & A Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 580-595). New York: Bloomsbury.

S. Borg2015Researching language teacher educationB PaltridgeA PhakitiResearch methods in applied linguistics580595New YorkBloomsbury

3 

Braine, G. (1999). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

G. Braine1999Non-native educators in English language teachingMahwah, NJLawrence Earlbaum

4 

Burns, A., & Richards, J. (2009). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. New York: Cambridge University Press.

A. BurnsJ. Richards2009The Cambridge guide to second language teacher educationNew YorkCambridge University Press

5 

Canagarajah, S. (2016). TESOL as a professional community: A half-century of pedagogy, research, and theory. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 7-41.

S. Canagarajah2016TESOL as a professional community: A half-century of pedagogy, research, and theoryTESOL Quarterly501741

6 

Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 219-225.

M. Cochran-Smith2005Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectivesTeaching and Teacher Education212219225

7 

Davies, A. (1991). The native speaker in applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

A. Davies1991The native speaker in applied linguisticsEdinburghEdinburgh University Press

8 

Farrell, T. (2013). Reflective practice in ESL teacher development groups: From practices to principles. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

T. Farrell2013Reflective practice in ESL teacher development groups: From practices to principlesLondonPalgrave MacMillan

9 

Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

D. Freeman2016Educating second language teachersOxford, UKOxford University Press

10 

Freeman, D., & Johnson, K.E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.

D. FreemanK.E. Johnson1998Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language Teacher EducationTESOL Quarterly323397417

11 

Hawkins, M. & Norton, B. (2009). Critical language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. Richards. (Eds), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 30-39). New York: Cambridge University Press .

M. HawkinsB. Norton2009Critical language teacher educationA BurnsJ RichardsThe Cambridge guide to second language teacher education3039New YorkCambridge University Press

12 

Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge .

K. E. Johnson2009Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspectiveNew YorkRoutledge

13 

Johnson, K. E. (2015). Reclaiming the relevance of L2 teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 515-525.

K. E. Johnson2015Reclaiming the relevance of L2 teacher educationModern Language Journal993515525

14 

Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. (2016). Mindful L2 teacher education. New York: Routledge .

K. E. JohnsonP. Golombek2016Mindful L2 teacher educationNew YorkRoutledge

15 

Knight, S., Lloyd, G., Arbaugh, F., Gamson, D., McDonald, S., & Nolan, J. (2014). Professional development and practices of teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 268-271.

S. KnightG. LloydF. ArbaughD. GamsonS. McDonaldJ. Nolan2014Professional development and practices of teacher educatorsJournal of Teacher Education654268271

16 

LaBoskey, V.K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings (817-869). In Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study practices, part two. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

V.K. LaBoskey2004The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings817869J. J. LoughranM. L. HamiltonV. K. LaBoskeyT. (Eds.) RussellInternational handbook of self-study practices, part twoBoston, MAKluwer Academic Publishers

17 

Lassonde, C., Galman, S., & Kosnik, C. (2009). Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Boston: Sense Publishers.

C. LassondeS. GalmanC. Kosnik2009Self-study research methodologies for teacher educatorsBostonSense Publishers

18 

Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

D. Lortie1975School teacher: A sociological studyChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press

19 

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271-283.

J. Loughran2014Professionally developing as a teacher educatorJournal of Teacher Education654271283

20 

Loughran, J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. (2004). International handbook of self-study practices, part two .Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

J. LoughranM. L. HamiltonV. K. LaBoskeyT. Russell2004International handbook of self-study practices, part twoBoston, MAKluwer Academic

21 

Peercy, M. & Sharkey, J. (forthcoming). Self-Study and teaching English to speakers of other languages. In A. Berry, S. Bullock, A. Crowe, H. Guðjónsdóttir, J. Kitchen, & M. Taylor. International handbook of self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education (2nd Edition). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.

M. PeercyJ. SharkeySelf-Study and teaching English to speakers of other languagesA BerryS BullockA CroweH GuðjónsdóttirJ KitchenM TaylorInternational handbook of self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education2nd EditionRotterdam, The NetherlandsSpringer

22 

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

R. Phillipson1992Linguistic imperialismOxfordOxford University Press

23 

Sharkey, J. & Peercy, M. (forthcoming). Self-study of language and literacy teacher education practices across culturally and linguistically diverse contexts. London: Emerald Publishing Group.

J. SharkeyM. PeercySelf-study of language and literacy teacher education practices across culturally and linguistically diverse contextsLondonEmerald Publishing Group

24 

Vanassche, E. & Kelchtermans, G. (2015). The state of the art in Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices: a systematic literature review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(4) 508-528.

E. VanasscheG. Kelchtermans2015The state of the art in Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices: a systematic literature reviewJournal of Curriculum Studies474508528

25 

Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practice. Language Teaching, 43, 259-296.

T. Wright2010Second language teacher education: Review of recent research on practiceLanguage Teaching43259296

26 

Zeichner, K. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 36-46.

K. Zeichner2007Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in Teacher EducationJournal of Teacher Education5813646

Notes

How to reference this article : Sharkey, J. (2018). Who’s educating the teacher educators? The role of self-study in teacher education practices (S-STEP) in advancing the research on the professional development of second language teacher educators and their pedagogies. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(1). DOI: 10.17533.udea/ikala.v23n01a02