Rapid assessment of mercury-contaminated sites through the Toxic Site Identification Program (TSIP). Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20221097Keywords:
mining, mercury, gold, contaminated sites, tailingsAbstract
Mercury concentration measurements were compiled from 72 sites located throughout seven departments of Colombia using field information gathered from 2016–2021 by Pure Earth, an international non-profit organization, and secondary information from previously conducted studies. These measurements and other data such as type of contaminated resource (water, soil), resource use (fishing, agricultural, residential, and industrial), estimated at-risk population, and permissible contamination limits were entered into Pure Earth’s Toxic Site Identification Program (TSIP) database. Using information from the TSIP database, the Blacksmith Index, a contaminated site intervention prioritization index, was calculated for all 72 sites. After applying exclusion criteria to the sites for this study, the results show that approximately 55,095 people are affected by mercury contamination in 44 sites. Of these study sites, the site with the highest Blacksmith Index value and therefore, the highest health risk due to mercury contamination, is La Bocana in the department of Valle del Cauca.
Downloads
References
J. Cardenas, A. Arcos, and E. Echavarria, “Seguridad y salud en la pequeña minería colombiana: estudios de caso en oro y carbón,” Mape Responsable, vol. 10, pp. 7–121, Feb. 2017.
F. Díaz, “Mercurio en la minería del oro: impacto en las fuentes hídricas destinadas para consumo humano,” Revista de Salud Pública, vol. 16, no. 6, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v16n6.45406
A. Romero. (n.d, n.d) La minería y la industrialización del país. una mirada desde antioquia. [Online]. Available: tinyurl.com/yrxrzb8w [4] H. Lozano and O. Pulido, “Situación actual del oro y la plata en colombia,” Boletín Geológico, vol. 27, no. 3, 1986. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.32685/0120-1425/bolgeol27.3.1986.467
Sinópsis nacional de la minería aurífera artesanal y de pequeña escala, Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (MADS), Bogotá, DC, 2012.
F. Pantoja and S. Pantoja, “Problemas y desafÍos de la minerÍa de oro artesanal y en pequeÑa escala en colombia,” Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, vol. 24, no. 2, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.2217
P. Cordy, M. Veiga, I. Salih, S. Saadi, S. Console, and et al., “Mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in antioquia, colombia: The world’s highest per capita mercury pollution,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 410-411, Dec. 1, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.006
(n.d.) Balance del oro 2012 - 2016. UPME. [Online]. Available: UPME.gov.co
M. Cárdenas and M. Reina. (2008) La minerÍa en colombia: Impacto socioeconÓmico y fiscal. FEDESARROLLO. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/893
G. Gamba, H. F. López, and L. Contreras, “Efectos de la inversión extranjera en la actividad minera colombiana y de cuatro países de la región,” Apuntes del CENES, vol. 31, no. 53, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/4
(n.d.) Producción histórica del oro. UPME. Accessed May. 28, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www1.upme.gov.co/simco/Cifras-Sectoriales/Paginas/oro.aspx
(2017) El mercurio y la salud. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Accessed Feb. 12, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/47w7pzfc
O. Tobón, N. Echavarría, and N. Atehortúa. (2016) Manual de producción y consumo sostenible gestión del recurso hídrico minerÍa de oro. CORANTIOQUIA. Medellín, ANT. [Online]. Available: https://www.corantioquia.gov.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Mineria_Oro.pdf
M. M. Veiga and R. F. Baker. (2004) Protocols for environmental and health assessment of mercury released by artisanal and small-scale gold miners. UNIDO, Vienna International Center. Vienna, AU. [Online]. Available: https://repository.usta.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11634/2923/2015lauragonzalez16.pdf?sequence=56
(2021) Gold mine production. GOLDHUB. Accessed Sep. 20, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data/historical-mine-production
V. A. Arias-Espana, A. R. Rodríguez-Pinilla, P. Bardos, and R. Naidu, “Contaminated land in colombia: A critical review of current status and future approach for the management of contaminated sites,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 618, Mar. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.245
Colombia Explotación de oro de aluvión - Evidencias a partir de percepción remota 2019, Minienergia - UNODC, Bogotá, DC, 2020.
(2018, Nov. 11,) Minería ilegal: los cráteres que se devoran a colombia. El Tiempo. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/mrypapbe
(2014) Oecd environmental performance reviews: Colombia. OECD/ECLAC. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208292-en
C. de la República de Colombia. (2018, May. 11,) Proyecto de ley no. 1892. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/5hyatzy4
ABC - Eliminación del mercurio en la minería del oro: Ley 1658 del 15 de julio de 2013, Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, 2013.
(2018, Jul. 16,) Prohíben el mercurio en la minería de oro en colombia. Medioambiente.
(2022) Promoviendo la recuperación y manejo responsable del mercurio en los relaves contaminados de minería de oro artesanal en colombia. Pure earth. Accessed Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/yk6rcuam
(n.d.) Contaminated sites. Toxic Site Identification Program. Accessed Apr. 6, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.contaminatedsites.org
(2020) Toxic site identification program (tsip). Pure Earth. Accessed Jun. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.pureearth.org/our-projects/toxic-site-identification-program-tsip/
(n.d.) Colombia: Transformación que beneficia a las comunidades locales. PlanetGOLD. Accessed Jun. 3, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.planetgold.org/es/colombia
(n.d.) Report from colombia: Investigación toxic sites. Pure earth. Accessed Jun. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.pureearth.org/investigating-toxic-sites-colombia/
J. Caravanos, S. Gualtero, R. Dowling, B. Ericson, J. Keith, and et al., “A simplifies risk-ranking system for prioritizing toxic pollution sites in low- and middle-income countries,” Annals of Global Health, vol. 80, no. 4, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.001
(2022) Regional screening levels (rsls) - generic tables. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed Jun. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables
M. de Ambiente y Desarrollo Territorial. (2015, Mar. 17,) Resolución 631 de 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/documento-normativa/resolucion-631-de-2015/
L. J. Bernal-Guzmán, “Minería de oro en el nordeste antioqueño: una disputa territorial por el desarrollo,” Gestión y Ambiente, vol. 21, no. 2, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v21n2supl.77865
J. Mantey, K. B. Nyarko, F. O. Nimo, K. A. Awua, C. K. Bempah, and et al., “Mercury contamination of soil and water media from different illegal artisanal small-scale gold mining operations (galamsey),” Revista Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 6, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04312
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
The material published in the journal can be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if the respective credits are given to the journal. No commercial benefit can be obtained and derivative works must be under the same license terms as the original work.
