Pneumatization refers to the development of air-filled cavities or air cells in bones, which may exist in various locations of the skull, including the temporal bone.1-6 Five regions have been described in it: middle ear, mastoid apophysis, peri-labyrinth, petrous apex, and accessory.1,7,8
The pneumatization of the temporal bone performs important functions, such as protecting the inner ear from external air pressure changes, reducing the skull’s weight by acting as a buffer against external injuries, and enabling the exchange of gases from the blood mucus barrier in mastoid cavities, which provides stable pressure in the middle ear, a key function in the transmission of sound.9,10
The term pneumatized articular tubercle (PAT) of temporal bone, first introduced by Tindall and Matteson,11 refers to the accessory cells at the root of the zygomatic arch and the articular tubercle (AT), with the following radiological characteristics: 1) they form an asymptomatic radiolucent defect in the temporal zygomatic apophysis with a mastoid cell-like appearance, 2) they spread up to the AT without going beyond the zygomatic-temporal suture, 3) absence of increased volume or signs of zygoma destruction.
The cause of PAT is still unknown but may be similar to that of other pneumatized areas, such as mastoid apophysis, with the most popular theory for it being the resorption of the diploe by active invasion of the tympanic epithelium. Pneumatization of the mastoid apophysis is almost complete by the age of five, but air cells can develop into adulthood. The zygomatic apophysis cells are formed after age nine, but there is no certainty as to at what time they begin to form in the AT.1,8,12
PAT can be observed in orthopantomography, which was considered the initial method for examining AT due to its low cost and low radiation dose compared with tomographic imaging.1,2,4,11,13-24 However, the latter is not likely to overlap with anatomical structures as in conventional imaging, and they exceed the diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of air spaces in the temporal bone.3,6,5,10,25,26
The roof of the temporal mandibular fossa (MF) is a thin sheet of bone separating the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) from the middle cranial fossa, with thickness ranging from 0.2 to 4.0 mm.27,28 This thickness difference may be due to the spatial resolution of the imaging method, the ratio of the image plane to the object being observed, the measuring tool used, the origin of the sample, and even by the conditions of the TMJ under study.28-30 In our practice, we have seen interrupted cortical fossa roof in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images, suggesting the presence of fine channels or small cavities in the MF, as stated by Carter et al14 and Eckerdal et al.31 This possible anatomical variation will be called “discontinuity of the mandibular fossa” (DMF) in this study.
Identifying these anatomical variants is important because they form areas of minimal resistance in the temporal bone, possibly enabling the extension of tumors, inflammation, infection or fracture of the TMJ,1,6,12,16,32-35 and complicating surgical procedures in the joint.5,6,13 In consequence, the present study is aimed at evaluating PAT and DMF through CT, with a focus on their distribution by age, sex, and laterality.
This was a descriptive, retrospective, field study using a convenience sample of CT images from 200 patients: 151 females (75.5%) and 49 males (24.5%) requiring examination of maxillo-mandibular structures in the period January 2012-May 2013. As inclusion criteria, images showing both temporomandibular joints were used, excluding cases with facial abnormalities, pathologies, surgical procedures, or trauma in surrounding areas.
The patients were aware of their images being used for teaching and research purposes, so they signed an informed consent for this study, guaranteeing anonymity. Being a retrospective study, it was not deemed necessary to consult the institution’s Ethics Committee.
All images were obtained in a 16-channel multi-slice CT scanner (Brightspeed, GE Healthcare, WI, USA), with patients in supine position and support for the skull, which was perpendicularly located by Camper’s plane towards the scanner’s table. Prior preparation of patient was not necessary. The images were obtained using the following parameters: slice width: 0.625 mm, pitch: 0.3 mm, 120 Kv, 100 mA, FOV for head, with bone tissue filter.
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images were analyzed by a single examiner-a maxillofacial radiologist with more than 15 years of experience in the field-using an Advantage Workstation (AW Volume Share 5, GE Healthcare, WI, USA) to obtain volumetric images in Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) and 3D, in order to assess the joints’ axial, sagittal and coronal planes. The observer was previously calibrated using 10% of the sample in order to define the criteria for the identification of PAT and DMF.
Data on each patient’s age, sex, presence or absence of PAT and presence or absence of DMF were recorded, as well as the laterality of the findings (unilateral or bilateral). PAT was verified in the presence of one or more hypodense images similar to mastoid cells, with no evidence of increased size in the anatomical structure nor destruction of the cortical (Figure 1), according to the criteria set forth by Tyndall and Mateson.11 DMF was verified in cases in which there was a hypodense zone at the center of the cortical, belonging to the fossa roof (Figure 2), confirmed with observations in the sagittal and coronal planes. As information was recorded for both TMJs, 400 joints were available.
In addition, a literature review was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar, in the search for possible series reporting the prevalence of PAT or DMF in the period 1980-2018, using the following key words: “articular eminence”, “pneumatization”, “articular tubercle pneumatization”, “zygomatic air cell defect”, and “zygomatic process”.
The distribution of the sample per age is shown in Table 1, with the highest percentage of patients in the group of 20- 29 years (n = 45, 22.5%). The average age was 41.6 ± 23.4 years. 19% of individuals had any of the studied variants, with 28 cases in females and 10 in males (Table 2). The frequency of PAT was 15.5%, with 21 cases (67.7%) in females and 10 (32.3%) in males. Concerning DMF, only seven patients showed the anatomical variant, with all being females (Figure 3).
Age group | aF | rF |
---|---|---|
0-9 | 2 | 1.0 |
10-19 | 24 | 12.0 |
20-29 | 45 | 22.5 |
30-39 | 34 | 17.0 |
40-49 | 30 | 15.0 |
50-59 | 37 | 18.5 |
60-69 | 22 | 11.0 |
70-79 | 6 | 3.0 |
Total | 200 | 100 |
Sex | Anatomical variant | Total | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Presence | Absence | |||||||||
aF | rF | aF | rF | aF | rF | |||||
Female | 28 | 14.0 | 123 | 61.5 | 151 | 75.5 | ||||
Male | 10 | 5.0 | 39 | 19.5 | 49 | 24.5 | ||||
Total | 38 | 19.0 | 162 | 81.0 | 200 | 100.0 |
Table 3 shows the distribution according to the presence or absence of variants per age group. It shows that no patient under the age of 10 had any of the variants. PAT was verified in the age range of 10 to 79 years (average age 42.83 ± 21.27). DMF was verified in the age range of 20 to 79 years (average age 49.5 ± 18.44). Concerning uni or bilateral localization (Table 4), most cases with PAT were bilateral, while DMF occurred unilaterally.
There are numerous air-filled cavities inside the skull in addition to the sinuses. These air cells or pneumatization may appear in different locations, including the temporal bone,1 where the cells are usually limited to the mastoid apophysis, peri-labyrinth and petrous apex, with rare cases of extensions to the squamous part.36
It has been noted that the development of air cells is preceded by the formation of bone cavities, a physiological process related to periosteal activity. The primitive bone marrow in these cavities differs in lax mesenchymal tissue, and the epithelium invaginates into this connective tissue, producing a mucous membrane which becomes atrophied, leaving a thin lining membrane adhered to the periosteum. The recession of this membrane and the sub-epithelial resorption of bone increase the air cells.1,16
The pneumatization process can be divided into three stages: 1) a childhood stage from birth to the age of two years, 2) a transitional stage from two to five years of age and 3) an adult phase. During the childhood stage, the air cells begin to be visible since the age of two years, in the transitional stage the mastoid undergoes a gradual increase with migration of cells to the periphery, becoming more noticeable over time due to the progressive calcification of their walls. Pneumatization stops in the adult phase.16 The pneumatization process usually begins prenatally during the 22-24 weeks of gestation. By week 28, the petrous apex begins to pneumatize, and the pneumatization pattern of the temporal bone is completed by the age of 10 years in females and 15 years in males.8
According to the literature reviewed for this study, PAT shows a prevalence of 1.90% in orthopantomography, varying from 1.03 to 3.60% in the reported series, in an age range of 6 to 90 years, with 32.32 years in average, showing a slight predilection for males and the bilateral form (Table 5). Concerning CT and CBCT findings, PAT prevalence was 27.68%, the age range was 5 to 85 years, with 38.45 years in average and bilateral cases being more common (Table 6).
Year | Author | Sample | PAT (%) | Age range | Mean age | Sex | Laterality | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female(%) | Male(%) | Unilat(%) | Bilat(%) | ||||||
1985 | Tyndall & Matteson11 | 1061 | 28(2.6) | 15-74 | 32.5 | 15(53.6) | 13(46.4) | 5(17.9) | 23(82.1) |
1986 | Kougar et al13 | 784 | 8(1.8) | 32-69 | 45.9 | 7(87.5) | 1(12.5) | 4(50.0) | 4(50.0) |
1999 | Carter et al14 | 2734 | 40(1.5) | 17-83 | 49.6 | 20(50.0) | 20(50.0) | 32(80.0) | 8(20.0) |
2001 | Hoffman et al15 | 1084 | 20(1.8) | 77-87 | 43.2 | 11(55.0) | 9(45.0) | 16(80.0) | 4(20.0) |
2005 | Orhan et al1 | 1006 | 19(1.8) | 11-90 | 36.6 | 12(63.1) | 7(36.9) | 12(63.1) | 7(36.9) |
2006 | Orhan et al16 | 1049 | 17(1.6) | 7-16 | 11.2 | 8(47.1) | 9(52.9) | 10(59.0) | 4(41.0) |
2009 | Yayuz et al2 | 8107 | 83(1.0) | 10-75 | 26.9 | 41(49.4) | 42(50.6) | 56(67.5) | 27(32.5) |
2010 | Srikanth HS et al17 | 600 | 15(2.5) | 20-50 | 30.2 | 8(53.3) | 7(46.6) | 9(60.0) | 6(40.0) |
2012 | Park et al18 | 1400 | 31(2.2) | 9-55 | 27.5 | 9(29.0) | 22(70.9) | 24(17.4) | 7(22.6) |
2012 | Gadda et al19 | 400 | 11(2.7) | 18-65 | 33.9 | 5(45.4) | 6(54.5) | 1(9.1) | 10(90.9) |
2012 | Patil et al20 | 7755 | 141(1.8) | 19-75 | 36.9 | 50(35.4) | 91(64.5) | 107(75.8) | 34(24.1) |
2012 | Zamaninazer et al4 | 2600 | 94(3.6) | 6-81 | 27.40 | 59(62.8) | 35(37.2) | 70(74.5) | 24(25.5) |
2013 | Gupta et al21 | 800 | 46(5.7) | 4-60 | 31.43 | 17(36.6) | 26(63.4) | 16(34.8) | 30(65.2) |
2014 | Srivahsa et al22 | 1688 | 50(2.9) | 7-18 | 13.86 | 27(54.0) | 23(46.0) | 38(76.0) | 12(24.0) |
2015 | Kishore et al23 | 2500 | 63(2.5) | 19-78 | 37.40 | 25(39.6) | 38(60.3) | 44(69.8) | 19(30.1) |
2016 | Nagaraj et al24 | 600 | 16(2.7) | 10-59 | 25.00 | 6(37.5) | 10(62.5) | 11(68.7) | 5(31.2) |
Total | 37991 | 750(1.9) | 6-90 | 32.32 | 359(47.8) | 388(52.1) | 497(66.2) | 250(35.7) |
Year Author | Sample | Method | PAT (%) | Age | range | Mean Age | Sex | Laterality | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female(%) | Male(%) | Unilat (%) | Bilat.(%) | |||||||
2011 | Miloglu et al3 | 514 | CBCT | 41(8.0) | 5-62 | 30.6 | 25(61.0) | 16(39.0) | 31(75.6) | 10(24.4) |
2013 | Ladeira et al5 | 658 | CBCT | 140(21.3) | 11-85 | 43.0 | - | - | 76(54.3) | 64(45.7) |
2014 | Bronoosh et al25 | 225 | CT | 43(9. 5) | 8-67 | - | 24(55.8) | 19(44.1) | 24(55.8) | 19(44.1) |
2015 | Ilguy et al26 | 111 | CBCT | 73(65.8) | - | 48.8 | - | - | 31(27.9) | 42(72.1) |
2017 | Shamshad6 | 100 | CT | 12(12.0) | 18-65 | 34.9 | - | - | 8(66.6) | 4(33.3) |
2018 | Khojastepoor et al10 | 327 | CBCT | 251(76.7) | 9-65 | 30.5 | 112(44.6) | 139(55.4) | 76(30.3) | 175(69.7) |
2018 | Presente estudio | 200 | CT | 31(15.5) | 10-79 | 42.8 | 21(67.7) | 10(31.2) | 15(48.3) | 16(51.6) |
Total | 2135 | 591(27.6) | 5-85 | 38.4 | - | - | 261(44.1) | 330(55.8) |
In comparing the results obtained in the present study with previous studies using tomographic imaging methods, it was found out that the frequency of PAT was close to that reported by Shamshad et al6 (12%), higher than that reported by Miloglu et al3 (8%) and Bronoosh et al25 (9.6%), and lower than the values observed by Ladeira et al5, Ilgüy et al26 and Khojastepour et al10 (21.3%, 65.8%, 76.7% respectively). Concerning mean age, it was similar to that found in the studies by Ladeira et al5 and Ilgüy et al26 (43.0 and 48.9 years respectively). The minimum age observed for the anatomical variant was close to that reported by Ladeira et al5 (11 years), Bronoosh et al25 (8 years) and Khojastepour et al10 (9 years), suggesting that pneumatization begins before puberty. As for the maximum age, it was slightly higher than that verified by Miloglu et al3 (62 years), Bronoosh et al25 (67 years) and Shamshad et al6 (65 years) and lower than that observed by Ladeira et al5 (85 years). In terms of sex, most reports, including the present study, show a predilection for females. Bilateral cases were most frequently observed in this and in all studies consulted. Concerning the variations found compared to other studies, these may be due to the source of the sample (dental clinics or other health centers), the age composition of the sample, the criteria for assessing PAT, the ethnic origin of selected patients,6 as well as the type and brand of the tomographic equipment.
The various reports on PAT prevalence seem to reflect the impact of the imaging method used for observation; thus, the frequency of PAT observed in tomographic studies is undoubtedly higher than that found in orthopantomography (Tables 5 and 6), and while PAT is visible in the latter, the least superficial mean portion of AT can only be observed in CT or CBCT, which probably influences the number of cases identified through them.
PAT should be differentiated from other types of radiolucency in the zygomatic arch, including aneurysmal bone cyst, hemangioma, giant cell tumor, eosinophilic granuloma, fibrous dysplasia, and metastasis. While PAT can be incidentally detected in X-rays as asymptomatic radiolucent images of non-expansive characteristics, all the other conditions present a painful increase in size and radiographically show a destructive appearance.3,5,12
It has been reported that the correlation between actual bone thickness and that shown by CT is high for structures of one millimeter or more, while those with dimensions below the spatial resolution of the equipment show a progressive difference between such thicknesses. Also, in clinical situations, the inclination of the bone wall varies in relation to the image plane, demonstrating that the combination of a bone wall with less than one millimeter in thickness and an inclination of 35° results in an image bigger than the actual thickness.29,30 In such circumstances, over-estimation would risk overlooking the presence of DMF. Moreover, it should be noted that the discontinuity of the cortical is a very thin bone that cannot be observed due to the size of the voxel;28 therefore, future research should seek the characterization of this possible anatomical variant of the temporal bone, as well as the influence of imaging parameters and the type of CT scanner used.
The importance of identifying these anatomical variations is that if bone thickness is reduced by the air cells or there is a discontinuity in the cortical, the extension of pathological processes in the TMJ would be facilitated due to the lower resistance in the area, so that tumors in the mastoid process and the ear could spread into the joint, while otitis or mastoiditis, as they involve the joint, would result in ankylosis of the joint.1,5,28 On the other hand, it has been found that the presence of air in the TMJ may be associated with acute fracture of the temporal bone,25,32,33 because surgical procedures performed on a temporal bone with such variations, as well as those performed on the mandibular bone component of TMJ or related soft tissues, could be complicated by unintended penetration of instruments, which may result in dural leakage, brain-spinal fluid leakage, intracranial infection or hemorrhage.3,10,12,25 It has also been noted that an extensive PAT could be a contraindication for tuberclectomy or tubercleplasty.3,25
In conclusion, CT helped identify PAT and DMF, studied anatomical variants with areas of minimal resistance that can facilitate the spread of pathologies and lesions of the TMJ to the median cranial fossa, as well as contraindicate a number of surgical acts that while altering their integrity could establish the aforementioned communication.
We thank the Féliz Boada Clinic in Caracas, Venezuela, for the technical support and access to the images used in this study.
1. Orhan K, Delilbasi C, Cebesi I, Paksoy C. Prevalence and variations of pneumatized articular eminence: a study from Turkey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99(3): 349-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.005
K Orhan C Delilbasi I Cebesi C Paksoy Prevalence and variations of pneumatized articular eminence: a study from TurkeyOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2005993349354https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.005
2. Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Güngör H, Büyükkurt MC. Prevalence of the pneumatized articular eminence in the temporal bone. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009; 37(3): 137-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.01.006
MS Yavuz MH Aras H Güngör MC Büyükkurt Prevalence of the pneumatized articular eminence in the temporal boneJ Craniomaxillofac Surg.2009373137139https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.01.006
3. Miloglu O, Yilmaz AB, Yildirim E, Akgul HM. Pneumatization of the articular eminence on cone-beam computed tomography: prevalence, characteristics and a review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40(2): 110-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/75842018
O Miloglu AB Yilmaz E Yildirim HM Akgul Pneumatization of the articular eminence on cone-beam computed tomography: prevalence, characteristics and a review of the literatureDentomaxillofac Radiol.2011402110114https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/75842018
4. Zamaninaser A, Rashidipoor R, Mosavat F, Ahmadi A. Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect: panoramic radiographic study of a selected Esfehanian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9(Suppl 1): S63-8.
A Zamaninaser R Rashidipoor F Mosavat A Ahmadi Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect: panoramic radiographic study of a selected Esfehanian populationDent Res J (Isfahan).201291S63S68
5. Ladeira DB, Barbosa GL, Nascimento MC, Cruz AD, Freitas DQ, Almeida SM. Prevalence and characteristics of pneumatization of the temporal bone evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(6): 771-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.12.001
DB Ladeira GL Barbosa MC Nascimento AD Cruz DQ Freitas SM Almeida Prevalence and characteristics of pneumatization of the temporal bone evaluated by cone beam computed tomographyInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2013426771775https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.12.001
6. Shamshad MP, Kamath G, Babshet M, Srikanth HS, Doddamani L. Prevalence of temporal bone pneumatization in relation to temporomandibular join: a computed tomographic study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 119(2): 118-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2017.11.016
MP Shamshad G Kamath M Babshet HS Srikanth L Doddamani Prevalence of temporal bone pneumatization in relation to temporomandibular join: a computed tomographic studyJ Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg.20181192118121https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2017.11.016
7. Virapongse C, Sarwar M, Bhimani S, Sasaki C, Shapiro R. Computed tomography of temporal bone pneumatization: 1. Normal pattern and morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985; 145(3): 473-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.145.3.473
C Virapongse M Sarwar S Bhimani C Sasaki R Shapiro Computed tomography of temporal bone pneumatization: 1. Normal pattern and morphologyAJR Am J Roentgenol.19851453473481https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.145.3.473
8. Jadhav AB, Fellows D, Hand AR, Tadinada A, Lurie AG. Classification and volumetric analysis of temporal bone pneumatization using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 117(3): 376-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.12.398
AB Jadhav D Fellows AR Hand A Tadinada AG Lurie Classification and volumetric analysis of temporal bone pneumatization using cone beam computed tomographyOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.20141173376384https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.12.398
9. Song SW, Jun BC, Kim H, Cho Y. Evaluation of temporal bone pneumatization with growth using 3D reconstructed image of computed tomography. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2017; 44(5): 522-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2016.11.006
SW Song BC Jun H Kim Y Cho Evaluation of temporal bone pneumatization with growth using 3D reconstructed image of computed tomographyAuris Nasus Larynx.2017445522527https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2016.11.006
10. Khojastepour L, Paknahad M, Abdalipur V, Paknahad M. Prevalence and characteristics of articular eminence pneumatization: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018; 17(3): 339-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1033-8
L Khojastepour M Paknahad V Abdalipur M Paknahad Prevalence and characteristics of articular eminence pneumatization: a cone-beam computed tomographic studyJ Maxillofac Oral Surg.2018173339344https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1033-8
11. Tyndall DA, Matteson SR. Radiographic appearance and population distribution of the pneumatized articular eminence of the temporal bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43(7): 493-7.
DA Tyndall SR Matteson Radiographic appearance and population distribution of the pneumatized articular eminence of the temporal boneJ Oral Maxillofac Surg.1985437493497
12. Stoopler ET, Pinto A, Stanton DC, Mupparapu M, Sollecito TP. Extensive pneumatization of the temporal bone and articular eminence: an incidental finding in a patient with facial pain. Case report and review of literature. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34(3): 211-4.
ET Stoopler A Pinto DC Stanton M Mupparapu TP Sollecito Extensive pneumatization of the temporal bone and articular eminence: an incidental finding in a patient with facial pain. Case report and review of literatureQuintessence Int.2003343211214
13. Kaugars GE, Mercuri LG, Laskin DM. Pneumatization of the articular eminence of the temporal bone: prevalence, development, and surgical treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986; 113(1): 55-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0130
GE Kaugars LG Mercuri DM Laskin Pneumatization of the articular eminence of the temporal bone: prevalence, development, and surgical treatmentJ Am Dent Assoc.198611315557https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0130
14. Carter LC, Haller AD, Calamel AD, Pfaffenbach AC. Zygomatic air cell defect (ZACD). Prevalence and characteristics in a dental clinic outpatient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28(2): 116-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600424
LC Carter AD Haller AD Calamel AC Pfaffenbach Zygomatic air cell defect (ZACD). Prevalence and characteristics in a dental clinic outpatient populationDentomaxillofac Radiol.1999282116122https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600424
15. Hofmann T, Friedrich RE, Wedl JS, Schmelzle R. Pneumatization of the zygomatic arch on pantomography. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2001; 5(3): 173-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100060100289
T Hofmann RE Friedrich JS Wedl R Schmelzle Pneumatization of the zygomatic arch on pantomographyMund Kiefer Gesichtschir.200153173179https://doi.org/10.1007/s100060100289
16. Orhan K, Delilbasi C, Orhan AI. Radiographic evaluation of pneumatized articular eminence in a group of Turkish children. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35(5): 365-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/77401728
K Orhan C Delilbasi AI Orhan Radiographic evaluation of pneumatized articular eminence in a group of Turkish childrenDentomaxillofac Radiol.2006355365370https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/77401728
17. Srikanth HS, Patil K, Mahima VG. Zygomatic air cell defect: a panoramic radiographic study of a south Indian population. Ind J Radiol Imaging. 2010; 20(2): 112-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.63052
HS Srikanth K Patil VG Mahima Zygomatic air cell defect: a panoramic radiographic study of a south Indian populationInd J Radiol Imaging.2010202112114https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.63052
18. Park YH, Lee SK, Park BH, Son HS, Choi M, Choi KS et al. Radiographic evaluation of the zygomatic air cell defect. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radio. 2002; 32(4): 207-12.
YH Park SK Lee BH Park HS Son M Choi KS Choi Radiographic evaluation of the zygomatic air cell defectKorean J Oral Maxillofac Radio.2002324207212
20. Patil K, Mahima VG, Malleshi SN, Srikanth HS. Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect in adults-a retrospective panoramic radiographic analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(5): 957-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.081
K Patil VG Mahima SN Malleshi HS. Srikanth Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect in adults-a retrospective panoramic radiographic analysisEur J Radiol.2012815957959https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.081
21. Gupta D, Sheikh S, Pallagatti S, Aggarwal A, Goyal G, Chidanandappa RN, et al. Zygomatic air cell defect: a panoramic radiographic study of a North Indian population. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013; 4 (4): 247-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00145.x
D Gupta S Sheikh S Pallagatti A Aggarwal G Goyal RN Chidanandappa Zygomatic air cell defect: a panoramic radiographic study of a North Indian populationJ Investig Clin Dent.201344247251https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00145.x
22. Srivathsa SH, Malleshi SN, Patil K, Guledgud MV. A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs for zygomatic air cell defect in children. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2014; 1(2): 79-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-6816.138469
SH Srivathsa SN Malleshi K Patil MV Guledgud A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs for zygomatic air cell defect in childrenSaudi J Oral Sci.2014127982https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-6816.138469
23. Kishore M, Panat SR, Kishore A, Aggarwal A, Upadhyay N, Agarwal N. Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect using orthopantomogram. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(9): ZC09-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/9045.6437
M Kishore SR Panat A Kishore A Aggarwal N Upadhyay N Agarwal Prevalence of zygomatic air cell defect using orthopantomogramJ Clin Diagn Res.201599ZC09ZC11https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/9045.6437
24. Nagaraj T, Nigam H, Balraj L, Santosh HN, Ghouse N, Tagore S. A population-based retrospective study of zygomatic air cell defect in Bengaluru. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2016; 3: 5-8.
T Nagaraj H Nigam L Balraj HN Santosh N Ghouse S Tagore A population-based retrospective study of zygomatic air cell defect in BengaluruJ Med Radiol Pathol Surg.2016358
25. Bronoosh P, Shakibafard A, Mokhtare MR, Munesi Rad T. Temporal bone pneumatisation: a computed tomography study of pneumatized articular tubercle. Clin Radiol. 2014: 69(2): 151-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.006
P Bronoosh A Shakibafard MR Mokhtare T Munesi Rad Temporal bone pneumatisation: a computed tomography study of pneumatized articular tubercleClin Radiol.2014692151156https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.006
26. İlgüy M, Dölekoğlu S, Fişekçioğlu E, Ersan N, İlgüy D. Evaluation of pneumatization in the articular eminence and roof of the glenoid fossa with cone-beam computed tomography. Balkan Med J. 2015; 32(1): 64-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15193
M İlgüy S Dölekoğlu E Fişekçioğlu N Ersan D İlgüy Evaluation of pneumatization in the articular eminence and roof of the glenoid fossa with cone-beam computed tomographyBalkan Med J.20153216468https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15193
27. Honda K, Kawashima S, Kashima M, Sawada K, Shinoda K, Sugisaki M. Relationship between sex, age, and the minimum thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in normal temporomandibular joints. Clin Anat. 2005; 18(1): 23-6.
K Honda S Kawashima M Kashima K Sawada K Shinoda M Sugisaki Relationship between sex, age, and the minimum thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in normal temporomandibular jointsClin Anat.20051812326
28. Al-Ekrish AA, Alorainy IA. Apparent discontinuity of the roof of the glenoid fossa on cone-beam computed tomography images of an asymptomatic temporomandibular joint. Oral Radiol. 2016; 32(1): 61-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-015-0207-7
AA Al-Ekrish IA Alorainy Apparent discontinuity of the roof of the glenoid fossa on cone-beam computed tomography images of an asymptomatic temporomandibular jointOral Radiol.20163216165http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-015-0207-7
29. Ahlqvist JB, Isberg AM. Bone demarcation of the temporomandibular joint. Validity of clinical assessment of bone thickness by means of CT. Acta Radiol. 1998; 39(6): 649-55.
JB Ahlqvist AM Isberg Bone demarcation of the temporomandibular joint. Validity of clinical assessment of bone thickness by means of CTActa Radiol.1998396649655
30. Ahlqvist JB, Isberg AM. Validity of computed tomography in imaging thin walls of the temporal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28(1): 13-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600398
JB Ahlqvist AM Isberg Validity of computed tomography in imaging thin walls of the temporal boneDentomaxillofac Radiol.19992811319https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600398
31. Eckerdal O, Ahlqvist J. Thin bony walls of the temporomandibular joint. Morphologic properties and tomographic reproduction. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1979; 20(2): 385-92.
O Eckerdal J Ahlqvist Thin bony walls of the temporomandibular joint. Morphologic properties and tomographic reproductionActa Radiol Diagn.1979202385392
32. Betz BW, Wiener MD. Air in the temporomandibular joint fossa: CT sign of temporal bone fracture. Radiology. 1991; 180(2): 463-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068313
BW Betz MD Wiener Air in the temporomandibular joint fossa: CT sign of temporal bone fractureRadiology.19911802463466https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068313
33. Montaser A, Goyal M, Weiner MA. Air in temporomandibular joint: an indirect, specific CT sign of temporal bone fracture in the setting of head trauma. J Trauma. 2011; 70(4): E73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e9c14d
A Montaser M Goyal MA Weiner Air in temporomandibular joint: an indirect, specific CT sign of temporal bone fracture in the setting of head traumaJ Trauma.2011704E73https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e9c14d
34. Ejima K, Schulze D, Stippig A, Matsumoto K, Rottke D, Honda K. Relationship between the thickness of the roof of glenoid fossa, condyle morphology and remaining teeth in asymptomatic European patients based on cone beam CT data sets. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(3): 90929410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/90929410
K Ejima D Schulze A Stippig K Matsumoto D Rottke K Honda Relationship between the thickness of the roof of glenoid fossa, condyle morphology and remaining teeth in asymptomatic European patients based on cone beam CT data setsDentomaxillofac Radiol.20134239092941090929410https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/90929410
35. Friedrich RE, Viezens L, Grzyska U. Pneumatization of the zygomatic process of temporal bone on computed tomograms. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016; 5: Doc16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000095
RE Friedrich L Viezens U Grzyska Pneumatization of the zygomatic process of temporal bone on computed tomogramsGMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW20165Doc16Doc16https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000095
36. Balzeau A, Grimaud-Hervé D. Cranial base morphology and temporal bone pneumatization in Asian Homo erectus. J Hum Evol. 2006; 51(4): 350-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.007
A Balzeau D Grimaud-Hervé Cranial base morphology and temporal bone pneumatization in Asian Homo erectusJ Hum Evol.2006514350359https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.007