Quinoa malt and blueberry functional beverage: effect of malting and consumer sensory evaluation

Authors

  • Eliana Gabriela Contreras López Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-2004
  • Tatiana Rojas-Ayerve Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, La Molina National Agrarian University, Av. La Molina s/n Lima 15024, Peru
  • Elizabeth Fuentes-Campos School of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, San Ignacio de Loyola University, Av. La Fontana 550, 15024 Lima, Peru https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-3556
  • Erika Lizet Chaiña Mamani Revalorisation of Natural Sources and Functional Foods Research Group (REVALF), San Marcos National University National University of San Marcos, Jr Puno 1002, Lima 15001, Peru.
  • Alessandra Arosena-Chao Revalorisation of Natural Sources and Functional Foods Research Group (REVALF), San Marcos National University National University of San Marcos, Jr Puno 1002, Lima 15001, Peru
  • Ana María Muñoz Jauregui Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, San Ignacio de Loyola University (ICAN-USIL), Campus Pachacamac, Section B, Plot 1, Fundo La Carolina, Pachacamac, 15823 Lima, Peru. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-9823

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v32n1a355890

Keywords:

Chenopodium quinoa, malt, phenolic compounds, sensory evaluation, antioxidant activity, Mixture design

Abstract

Background: Consumers are looking for functional, natural products, valuing minimally processed, additive-free foods that include ancestral crops such as quinoa for their sustainability, nutritional quality and cultural connection. 

Objective: to evaluate the influence of processing on the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic compounds and consumer liking of a functional beverage based on quinoa malt (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) pulp. 

Methods: Total phenolic compounds (TPC) were determined by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry (UV-Vis). The antioxidant capacity was determined by the 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) and 2,2-diphenyl1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods were applied. Consumer liking level was determined using a five-point verbal scale on 86 untrained evaluators. 

Results: The mixture design was employed with minimum-maximum constraints to obtain the optimized beverage formulation based on the blend of three types of quinoa malt [black quinoa malt (BQM), red quinoa malt (RQM), and white quinoa malt (WQM)]. The response variables were antioxidant activity using the DPPH and ABTS methods. Each of the response variables was maximized and fitted to the quadratic regression model. The optimum formula had 70% black quinoa malt (BQM), 20% red quinoa malt (RQM) and 10% white quinoa malt (WQM). Antioxidant capacity increased from stage to stage from 45.11 ± 0.26 µg TE/g in sprouted quinoa (SQ) to 767.55 ± 4.94 µg TE/g in quinoa malt-based beverage with the inclusion of blueberry pulp (QMB) using the DPPH method and from 271.64 ± 1.23 µg TE/g in SQ to 834.32 ± 2.14 µg TE/g in QMB using the ABTS method. The sensory evaluators rated QMB between "good" and "super good" according to the attributes of odor, color, taste and appearance, evaluated. 

Conclusions: Quinoa malting and fruit addition significantly influenced the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic compounds. Furthermore, the sensory characteristics of the beverage were described within the range of "good" to "super good" in the evaluated attributes.

|Abstract
= 161 veces | PDF
= 116 veces| | GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
= 16 veces| | EPUB
= 0 veces| | XML
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pedrali D, Giupponi L, De la Peña-Armada R, Villanueva-Suárez MJ, Mateos-Aparicio I. The quinoa variety influences the nutritional and antioxidant profile rather than the geographic factors. Food Chem [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 nov 2]; 402:133531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133531

Mohamed Ahmed IA, Al Juhaimi F, Özcan MM. Insights into the nutritional value and bioactive properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): past, present and future prospective. Int. J. of Food Sci. & Technol. 2021;56(8):3726-3741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15011

Bhinder S, Kumari S, Singh B, Kaur A, Singh N. Impact of germination on phenolic composition, antioxidant properties, antinutritional factors, mineral content and Maillard reaction products of malted quinoa flour. Food Chem [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 nov 2];346:128915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128915

Sekhavatizadeh SS, Karimi A, Hosseinzadeh S, Shaviklo Amir R, Abedi M, Mahmoodianfard H, et al. Nutritional and sensory properties of low-fat milk dessert enriched with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) Titicaca protein isolate. Food Sci. & Nutr. 2022;n/a(n/a):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3082

Chaudhary N, Walia S, Kumar R. Functional composition, physiological effect and agronomy of future food quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A review. J. of Food Compos. and Anal. 2023;118:105192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105192

Xiu-shi Y, Pei-you Q, Hui-min G, Gui-xing R. Quinoa industry development in China. Int. J. of Agric. and Nat. Resources. 2019;46(2):208-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v46i2.2157

Zhang Y, Wang X, Guan X. Effects of adding quinoa flour on the composite wheat dough: a comprehensive analysis of the pasting, farinograph and rheological properties. Int. J. of Food Sci. & Technol. 2022;57(11):7099-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16049

Bendezu-Ccanto J, Contreras-López E, Lozada-Urbano M. Development and characterization of an optimized novel drink from three varieties of sprouted quinoa. Afr. J. of Food, Agric., Nutr. & Development. 2023;23(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.122.22435

Carciochi RA, Dimitrov K, Galván D´Alessandro L. Effect of malting conditions on phenolic content, Maillard reaction products formation, and antioxidant activity of quinoa seeds. J. of Food Sci. and Technol. 2016;53(11):3978-85. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s13197-016-2393-7

Garzón AG, Drago SR. Aptitude of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) hybrids for brewery or bio-functional malted beverages. J. of Food Biochem.. 2018;42(6):e12692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12692

Song L, Song L, Su H, Ma F, Zhang B. Superfine grinding affects particle size, chemical ingredients, and physicochemical properties of sprouting quinoa. Cereal Chem. 2022;99(3):520-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10515

Chandrasekara A, Senanayake I, Kumari D, Shahidi F. Effect of processing on the antioxidant activities of porridges and Pittu prepared from finger millets (Eleusine coracana). Food Prod., Process. and Nutr. 2022;4(1):18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-022-00097-x

Deželak M, Zarnkow M, Becker T, Košir IJ. Processing of bottom-fermented gluten-free beer-like beverages based on buckwheat and quinoa malt with chemical and sensory characterization. J. of the Inst. of Brew. 2014;120(4):360-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.166

Chawanda ET, Manhokwe S, Jombo TZ, Mugadza DT, Njini M, Manjeru P. Optimisation of Malting Parameters for Quinoa and Barley: Application of Response Surface Methodology. J. of Food Qual. 2022;2022:5279177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5279177

Paucar-Menacho LM, Martínez-Villaluenga C, Dueñas M, Frias J, Peñas E. Response surface optimisation of germination conditions to improve the accumulation of bioactive compounds and the antioxidant activity in quinoa. Int. J. of Food Sci. & Technol. 2018;53(2):516-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13623

Bedoya-Cataño JF, Ramón-Palacio C, Gil-Garzón MA, Ramírez-Sánchez C. Extracción de antioxidantes de los arándanos (Vaccinium corymbosum): efecto de solventes verdes sobre polifenoles totales, capacidad antioxidante y comportamiento electroquímico. TecnoLógicas. 2022;25(53). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.2277

Borowiec K, Stachniuk A, Szwajgier D, Trzpil A. Polyphenols composition and the biological effects of six selected small dark fruits. Food Chemistry. 2022;391:133281.

Kaur I, Tanwar B. Quinoa beverages: Formulation, processing and potential health benefits. Romanian J. of Diabetes Nutr. and Metabolic Diseases. 2016;23(2):215-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133281

Mayer H, Marconi O, Regnicoli GF, Perretti G, Fantozzi P. Production of a Saccharifying Rice Malt for Brewing Using Different Rice Varieties and Malting Parameters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem. 2014;62(23):5369-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501462a

Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier M-E, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food sci. and Technol. 1995;28(1):25-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26(9-10):1231-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3

Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. of Enology and Viticulture. 1965;16(3):144-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144

Meilgaard M, Civille G, Carr B. Sensory evaluation techniques, Fifth edition, Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. 588p.

Cornell JA. A primer on experiments with mixtures [Internet]. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011 [cited 2023 Oct 12]. 361p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470907443

Baugreet S, Kerry JP, Allen P, Hamill RM. Optimisation of protein-fortified beef patties targeted to the needs of older adults: a mixture design approach. Meat Sci. 2017;134:111-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.07.023

Pellegrini M, Lucas-Gonzales R, Ricci A, Fontecha J, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez JA, et al. Chemical, fatty acid, polyphenolic profile, techno-functional and antioxidant properties of flours obtained from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) seeds. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;111:38-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.006

Guevara-Terán M, Padilla-Arias K, Beltrán-Novoa A, González-Paramás AM, Giampieri F, Battino M, et al. Influence of Altitudes and Development Stages on the Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Capacity of the Wild Andean Blueberry (Vaccinium floribundum Kunth). Molecules. 2022;27(21):7525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217525

Casati CB, Baeza R, Sánchez V. Physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds content in encapsulated freeze-dried powders obtained from blueberry, elderberry, blackcurrant and maqui berry. J. of Berry Res. 2019;9:431-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JBR-190409

Rojas-Ocampo E, Torrejón-Valqui L, Muñóz-Astecker LD, Medina-Mendoza M, Mori-Mestanza D, Castro-Alayo EM. Antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content and phenolic compounds of pulp and bagasse of four Peruvian berries. Heliyon. 2021;7(8):e07787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07787

Busso Casati C, Baeza R, Sánchez V. Comparison of the kinetics of monomeric anthocyanins loss and colour changes in thermally treated Blackcurrant, Maqui Berry and Blueberry pulps from Argentina. J. of Berry Res. 2017;7:85-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JBR-170151

Rudnykh SI, Ríos VIL. Elección de la función de deseabilidad para diseños óptimos bajo restricciones. Revista EIA. 2018;15(30):13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v15i30.903

Rößle C, Ktenioudaki A, Gallagher E. Inulin and oligofructose as fat and sugar substitutes in quick breads (scones): a mixture design approach. Eur. Food Res. and Technol. 2011;233(1):167-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-011-1514-9

Mahdi SA, Astawan M, Wulandari N, Muhandri T, Wresdiyati T, Febrinda AE. Formula Optimization and Physicochemical Characterization of Tempe Drink Powder. Curr. Res. in Nutr. and Food Sci. J. 2022;10(3):1178-95. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.10.3.31

Ribeiro LdO, Santos JGCd, Gomes FdS, Cabral LMC, Sá DdGCF, Matta VMd, et al. Sensory evaluation and antioxidant capacity as quality parameters in the development of a banana, strawberry and juçara smoothie. Food Sci. and Technol. 2017;38:653-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.12017

Lan Y, Zhang W, Liu F, Wang L, Yang X, Ma S, et al. Recent advances in physiochemical changes, nutritional value, bioactivities, and food applications of germinated quinoa: A comprehensive review. Food Chem. 2023;426:136390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136390

Ozkan G, Ercisli S, Zeb A, Agar G, Sagbas HI, Ilhan G. Some Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics of Wild Grown Caucasian Whortleberry (Vaccinium arctostaphylos L.) Genotypes from Northeastern Turkey. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2018;47(2):378-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111288

Maruyama S, Streletskaya NA, Lim J. Clean label: Why this ingredient but not that one? Food Qual. and Preference. 2021;87:104062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104062

 Influence  of processing on the antioxidant capacity and total phenolic compounds and consumer liking  of a functional beverage based on quinoa malt (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and blueberry  (Vaccinium corymbosum) pulp

Published

02-05-2025

How to Cite

Contreras López, E. G., Rojas-Ayerve, T., Fuentes-Campos, E., Chaiña Mamani, E. L., Arosena-Chao, A., & Muñoz Jauregui, A. M. (2025). Quinoa malt and blueberry functional beverage: effect of malting and consumer sensory evaluation. Vitae, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v32n1a355890

Issue

Section

Foods: Science, Engineering and Technology