Cambios en la nomenclatura o nombres de hongos de importancia médica:  ¿Un avance o una pesadilla?

Ángel González; Álvaro León Rúa Giraldo

doi:10.17533/udea.hm.v15n1a01

Autores/as

Ángel González Universidad de Antioquia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-7938
Álvaro León Rúa Giraldo Universidad de Antioquia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-2461

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.hm.v15n1a01

Palabras clave:

nomenclatura, hongos

|Resumen

= 81 veces | PDF

= 96 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

1. de Hoog S, Walsh TJ, Ahmed SA, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Alexander BD, Arendrup MC, et al. A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC. J Clin Microbiol. 2023; 61(11):e0087323.

2. Redhead SA. 2010. Report on the special committee on the nomencla ture of fungi with a pleomorphic life cycle. TAXON 59:1863–1866.

3. Hawksworth DL, Crous PW, Redhead SA, Reynolds DR, Samson RA, Seifert KA, et al. 2011. The Amsterdam declaration on fungal nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2:105–112. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14

4. Flann C, Turland NJ, Monro AM. 2014. Report on botanical nomenclature —Melbourne 2011. XVIII international botanical congress, Melbourne: nomenclature section, 18–22 July 2011. PhytoKeys:1–289. https://doi. org/10.3897/phytokeys.41.8398

5. McNeill J, Barrie F, Buck W, Demoulin V, We G, Hawksworth D, et al. 2012. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne code). Vol. 154. Koeltz scientific books, Königstein.

6. Guarro J, Gené J, Ahmed SA, Al-Hatmi AMS, Figueras MJ, Vitale RG. 2020. Atlas of clinical fungi. 4th ed, p 1599. Foundation Atlas of Clinical Fungi, Hilversum.

7. Warnock DW. Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2012 to 2015. J Clin Microbiol 2017; 55:53–9.

8. Warnock DW. Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2016–2017. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57:e01183–18.

9. Borman AM, Johnson EM. Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2018 to 2019. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:e01811–20.

10. Borman AM, Johnson EM. Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2020 to 2021. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:e0033022

11. Kidd SE, Halliday CL, McMullan B, Chen SC, Elvy J. 2021. New names for fungi of medical importance: can we have our cake and eat it too? J Clin Microbiol 59:e02730-20.

12. Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, et al, eds. 2018: International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China. Regnum Vegetabile 159. 2017. Glashütten, Germany: Koeltz Botanical Books. https:// doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018

13. Kidd SE, Abdolrasouli A, Hagen F. Fungal Nomenclature: Managing Change is the Name of the Game. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(1):ofac559.

14. Wang F, Wang K, Cai L, Zhao M, Kirk PM, Fan G, Sun Q, Li B, Wang S, Yu Z, Han D, Ma J, Wu L, Yao Y. Fungal names: a comprehensive nomenclatural repository and knowledge base for fungal taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Jan 6;51(D1):D708-D716.

15. Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE, Wickes BL, Meyer WCuomo CA, Wollenburg KR, Bicanic TA, et al. 2017. The Case for Adopting the “Species Complex” Nomenclature for the Etiologic Agents of Cryptococcosis. mSphere 2:10.1128/msphere.00357-16.

16. Atlas of Clinical Fungi [Internet]. Bearn (NL): Foundation Atlas of Fungal Infection; 2016-2024. Disponible en: www.atlasclinicalfungi.org/

17. Index Fungorum [Internet]. (UK): Index Fungorum Partnership; 2024. Disponible en: www.indexfungorum.org

18. Mycobank [Internet]. Utrecht: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute; Uppsalalaan 8, Utrecht; 2024. Disponible en: www.mycobank.org