Innovación y Desarrollo Local: Actores estratégicos en el apoyo sistémico a la creación del start up
Palabras clave:
innovación, el desarrollo, la puesta en marchaResumen
Estudios han confirmado que los spin-off académicos configurados en mayoría como nuevas empresas “technology based”, resultan ser más innovadoras respecto a la media de las empresas; de esta forma, estas empresas contribuyen directamente a la creación de conocimiento, y representan la fuente de nuevos trabajos cualificados. Este Artículo, a partir del análisis de 15 casos de economías locales exitosos en términos de creación sistemática de start-up innovadoras, provee la construcción de diferentes hipótesis. Este artículo examina el papel desempeñado por un cierto tipo de actor llamado “meta-organización”, que desempeña un papel en la implementación de redes de innovación y la revisión de las políticas de desarrollo de los sistemas locales. Con este fin, hemos desarrollado un modelo en tres pasos siguiendo el modelo del ciclo de vida de las redes presentadas por Larson y Starr para destacar las principales características y funciones de la “meta-organización”
Descargas
Citas
Ahuja G. 2000. Collaboration networks and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
Antonelli G. 2003, Organizzare l’innovazione: spin off da ricerca, metaorganizzatori ed ambiente relazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Antonelli G. Consiglio S., 2005, “I fattori di successo delle metaorganizzazioni: assetti organizzativi
a confronto”, in Bodega D., Organizzare a misura d’uomo, Milano, McGraw Hill.
Antonelli G., 2013. The local innovation networks: an explorative study of success cluster.
THE Business Review, CAMBRIDGE, vol. Dec, ISSN: 1553-5827 2012 -
Antonelli G., 2009 – Il social capital nei network di innovazione: il caso Molise, Rassegna
Economica, giugno.
Arora A., Florida R., Gates G.J. & Kamlet M. 2000. Human Capital, Quality of Place and
Location. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnagie Mellon University.
Arrighetti A. & Vivarelli M., 1998. Motivazioni economiche and componenti evolutive nella formazione
di spin-of., Parma: Università di Parma.
Autio E., 1995. The king and his clothes: ten general misconceptions of new, technolog y-based firms. Helsinki
University of Technology, Institute of Industrial Management, Espoo.
Barley S. R. e Tolbert P. S. 1997. Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links
between Action and Institution. Organization Studies, 18, 1.
Boissevain J. 197.4 Friends of friends. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bruderl J. & Preisendorfer P. 1998. Network support and the success of new founded business. Small Business Economic, 10.
Burt R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Burt R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. in Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 : 339-365.
Coleman J.S. 1988. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman J.S. 1988. Social Capital in the creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology
: 95-121.
Consiglio S. & Antonelli G. 2003. Il metaorganizzatore nei processi di spin off da ricerca.
Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 196.
Daval, 1999. Conceptualisation et modelisation de l’essaimage. In Fontaine J., Saporta B. E
Verstraete T., Actes du 1° Congrès de l’Acadèmie de l’Entrepreneuriat. Pòle Universataire
Europèen Lille Nord-Pas de Calais.
Degroof J.J., Roberts E., 2003,“Spinning-off new ventures from academic institutions in areas
with weak entrepreneurial infrastructure: insights on the impact of spin-off processes
on the growth-orientation of ventures”, Working Paper 4311-03, MIT Sloan School of
Management, Boston.
Dubini & Aldrich 1991. Personal and Extended Networks are central to the Entrepreneurial
Process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 305-313.
Eisenhardt K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management
Review, 4: 532-550.
FloridaR, 2000. The Economic Geography of Talent. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnagie Mellon University.
Fontes M. 1998. The role of entrepreneurial firms in the transfer of public research to the productive sector. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College.
Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociolog y,78 (6): 1360-1380.
Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness.
American Journal of Sociolog y, 91.
Hansen E.L. 1995. Entrepreneurial Network and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship:
theory and practice, 19.
Hansen M.T., Chesbrough H.W. & Sull D.N. 2000. Networked incubators: hothouses of the New
Economy. Harvard Business Review, 5: 75-83.
Hansen M.T., The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across
organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 82-111, 1999.
Hargadon A. and Sutton R.I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 716-749.
Jarrillo J. C. 1988. On strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9.
Larsson, A., & Starr, J.A. 1993. A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 11: 5–15.
Makinen H. 2001. On the emergence and structure of a new regional network. Human Systems Management, 20,(3): 249-283.
Marsden P.V. 1982. Brokerage Behaviour in Restricted Exchange Networks. In Marsden & Lin Social
structure and network analysis. London: Sage.
McEvily B. & Zaheer A. 1999. Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive
capabilities. in Strategic Management Journal, 20: 1133-1156.
Merton R.K. 1968. Continuities in the theory of reference group behavior. In Merton R.K.
Social Theory and structures. New York : Free Press.
Miles M. B. & Huberman A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE.
Mustar P. 1995. The creation of enterprises by researchers: conditions for growth and the role of Public Authorities. High Level Workshop on SMEs: Employment, Innovation and Growth, Washington.
Neergaard H. 2001.The Process of Entrepreneurship: a Managerial and Organizational Journey, Movements
of Entrepreneurship. ESBRI Workshop, Stockholm, June.
Nelson R.R &Winter S.G 1982. An Evolutionaru Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge Mass:
Harward University Press.
Nohria N. & Eccles R.G. 1992. Networks and Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Piccaluga A. 1999. Le imprese spin-off della ricerca nell’esperienza internazionale e nazionale.
Studi Economici, 24.
Piccaluga A., Chiesa V. 1996. La ricerca fa impresa. Area Magazine, 16.
Podolny J.M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociolog y
:33-60.
Pollock T.J, Porac J.F., Wade J.B. (2004), “Constructing Deal Networks: Brokers as Network
‘Architects’ in the U.S. IPO Market and other Examples”, Academy of Management Review,
(1), pp. 50-72.
Provan K.G. & Human S.E. 2000. Organizational learning and the role of the network broker
in small-firm manufacturing networks. In Grandori A., Interfirm Networks. London:
Routledge.
Roberts E.B.& Malone D. 1996. Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from
research and development organization. R&D Management, 1.
Shaw M.E. 1978. Communication networks fourteen years later. In Berkowitz L. Group processes.
New York: Academic Press.
Simmel G. 1955. Conflict and the web of group affiliation. Trans. by Wolff K. H. & Bendix R. New
York: Free Press.
Starr J.A. & Mcmillan I.C. 1990. Resource cooptation via social contracting: resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal,11.
Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an
industry network. Organization Science, 8 (2): 109-125.
Yin R.K. 1984. Case study research: design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5,
Beverly Hills: SAGE Pubbl.
Zhao L., Aram J.D. 1995. Networking and Grow of Young Technology-Intensive Ventures in
China. Journal of Business Venturing, 10.
