Confiar en la ciencia es necesario para el futuro de la humanidad: Desarrollo del espíritu crítico para combatir la seudociencia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.hm.v12n2a01Downloads
References
Peinado M & Lorca LL. Por que los antivacunas ponen en riesgo la inmunizacion contra la covid-19 en Estados Unidos [Internet]. The Conversation. 2021 [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]. Disponible en: https://theconversation. com/por-que-los-antivacunas-ponen-en-riesgola- inmunizacion-contra-la-covid-19-en-estadosunidos- 162302
PAHO. PAHO warns against use of chlorine products as treatments for COVID-19 - PAHO/WHO | Pan American Health Organization [Internet]. 2020 [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/en/ news/5-8-2020-paho-warns-against-use-chlorineproducts- treatments-covid-19
Keech C, Glenn GM, Albert G, Cho I, Robertson A, Reed P, et al. First-in-Human Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine Authors, highest degree, and affiliation/institution. medRxiv [Internet]. 2020 [Consultado 22 Ene 2021]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.05.20168435
Gómez Marín JE. Vacunas para COVID19: las lecciones de un triunfo de la ciencia biomedica. Infectio [Internet]. 2021 Jan [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]; 25(3):143. Disponible en: https://www.revistainfectio.org/index. php/infectio/article/view/936
Gomez-Marin JE. El proceso de validacion del conocimiento: el indispensable valor de la revista cientifica. Infectio [Internet]. 2020 May [Consultado 24 Jul 2021];12;24(3):1 Disponible en: http://www. revistainfectio.org/index.php/infectio/article/view/896
Hotez PJ. Anti-science kills: From Soviet embrace of pseudoscience to accelerated attacks on US biomedicine. PLOS Biol [Internet]. 2021 Jan [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]; 19(1):e3001068. Disponible en: https://dx.plos. org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001068
Kasapçopur Ö. Science and pseudoscience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Turk Pediatr Arşivi [Internet]. 2020 [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]; 55(4):335– 6. Disponible en: http://turkarchpediatr.org//en/ science-and-pseudoscience-during-the-covid-19- pandemic-131170
Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Lazić A, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. Appl Cogn Psychol. [Internet]. 2021 Mar [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]; 35(2):486–96. Disponible en: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.3770
Sternberg RJ. Critical Thinking: Its nature, measurement, and improvement [Internet]. New Haven; 1986 [Consultado 17 Jul 2017] Disponible en: http://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED272882.pdf
Kamin CS, O’Sullivan PS, Younger M, Deterding R. Measuring Critical Thinking in Problem-Based Learning Discourse. Teach Learn Med [Internet]. 2001 Jan [Consultado 20 Jul 2020]; 13(1):27–35. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11273376
Barz DL, Achimaş-Cadariu A. The development of scientific reasoning in medical education: a psychological perspective. Clujul Med [Internet]. 2016 Feb [Consultado 17 Mar 2017]; 89(1):32–7. Disponible en: http://www.clujulmedical.umfcluj.ro/index.php/ cjmed/article/view/530
Brookfield S. Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions [Internet]. Jossey-Bass; 2012 [Consultado 20 Jul 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.questia.com/ library/journal/1G1-387347330/brookfield-s-2012- teaching-for-critical-thinking
Papp KK, Huang GC, Lauzon Clabo LM, Delva D, Fischer M, Konopasek L, et al. Milestones of critical thinking: a developmental model for medicine and nursing. Acad Med [Internet]. 2014 May [Consultado 20 Jul 2017]; 89(5):715–20. Disponible en: http://content. wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landing page&an=00001888-201405000-00014
Schwarz MR, Wojtczak A. Global minimum essential requirements: a road towards competenceoriented medical education. Med Teach [Internet]. 2002 Jan [Consultado 17 Jul 2017]; 24(2):125–9. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ full/10.1080/01421590220120740
Wolyniak MJ, Bemis LT, Prunuske AJ. Improving medical students’ knowledge of genetic disease: a review of current and emerging pedagogical practices. 12 González Á. Adv Med Educ Pract [Internet]. 2015 Oct [cited 2017 Mar 17]; 6:597–607. Disponible en: https://www.dovepress. com/improving-medical-students39-knowledge-ofgenetic- disease-a-review-of--peer-reviewed-article- AMEP
Dehane S. Ecole eclairee par la science | Editions Odile Jacob [Internet]. Dehane S, editor. Paris: Odile Jacob; 2021 [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]. Disponible en: https:// www.odilejacob.fr/catalogue/sciences-humaines/ education-enseignement-pedagogie/ecole-eclaireepar- la-science_9782738154897.php
Gomez-Marín JE. Science, public health and decision making [Internet]. Infectio. Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia; 2021 [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]. 25:205–6. Disponible en: https://www.revistainfectio.org/index. php/infectio/article/view/952
Pasquinelli E, Farina M, Bedel A, Casati R. Definir et eduquer l’esprit critique. 2020 Jul [Consultado 24 Jul 2021]; Disponible en: https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ ijn_02887414
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Hechos Microbiológicos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.