Programas de conservación basados en la comunidad y disposición a pagar de los habitantes locales por la conservación silvestre: el caso del mono tití cabeciblanco en el Caribe colombiano

Andrés Vargas; David Díaz

doi:10.17533/udea.le.n81a7

Auteurs-es

Andrés Vargas Université du Nord
David Díaz Université du Nord

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n81a7

Mots-clés :

biodiversité, évaluation contingente, conservation à base communautaire, forêt tropicale sèche

Résumé

La conservation de la nature à base communautaire (CBC) est une méthode conçue pour développer des programmes de conservation de la nature, laquelle considère que les gens locaux ont la clé de la réussite des programmes. Ce type de méthode prévoit que les incitations financières augmentent l’appui des gens aux programmes. Cet article utilise la volonté de payer (CAP) dans le cas particulière de la préservation de l'habitat du tamarin à crête blanche (Saguinus Oedipe) en tant qu’un moyen pour d'analyser l'effet de la participation des gens à un programme du type CBC sur le soutien accrue à l'activité de conservation. Grâce à la méthode d'évaluation contingente, nous avons constaté que: premièrement, les ménages qui reçoivent un revenu en participant au programme de conservation voudraient soutenir la préservation d'un habitat plus vaste. Deuxièmement, aussi bien les ménages participants que les ménages non-participants sont également sensibles à l'augmentation du coût de la conservation et, finalement, le programme CBC n'est pas perçue comme une change additionnelle pour les ménages non-participants.

|Résumé

= 1171 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 298 veces| | HTML (ENGLISH)

= 89 veces|

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Andrés Vargas, Université du Nord

Professeur et chercheur. Département d'économie, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla

David Díaz, Université du Nord

Professeur et chercheur. Département d'économie, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla

Références

Altonji, Joseph & Elder, Todd (2005). “An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling”, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 40, Issue 4, pp. 791-821.

Allendorf, Teri; Swe, Khaing Khaing; Oo, Thida; Htut, Ye; Aung, Myint; Aung, Myint, . . . Wemmer, Chris (2006). “Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma)”, Environmental Conservation, Vol. 33, Issue 04, pp. 344-352.

Arjunan, M.; Holmes, Christopher; Puyravaud, Jean-Philippe & Davidar, Priya (2006). “Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 79, Issue 2, pp. 188-197.

Arrow, Kenneth & Solow, Robert; Portney, Paul; Leamer, Edward; Radner, Roy; Schuman, Howard (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Washington, DC.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Berkes, Fikret (2004). “Rethinking Community-Based Conservation”, Conservation Biology, Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 621-630.

Carson, Richard T. (2012). “Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 27-42.

Daily, Gretchen & Matson, Pamela (2008). “Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 28, pp. 9455-9456.

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) (2013). “Pobreza monetaria y multidemensional 2013”. Recuperado de: www.dane. gov.co/index.php/es/estdisticas-sociales/pobreza/87-sociales/calidad-devida/5405-pobreza-monetaria-y-multidimensional-2013 (marzo de 2014).

Díaz Merlano, Juan Manuel (2006). Bosque seco tropical de Colombia. Bogotá: I/M Editores.

Garnett, Stephen; Sayer, Jeffrey & Du Troit, Johan (2007). “Improving the effectivness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework”, Ecology and Society, vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 1-20.

Greene, William (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th Edition). USA: Prentice Hall.

Herriges, Joseph; Kling, Catherine; Liu, Chih-Chen & Tobias, Justin (2010). “What are the consequences of consequentiality?”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 59, Issue 1, pp. 67-81.

Instituto Alexander von Humboldt (1998). “El bosque seco tropical (Bs-T) en Colombia”. Recuperado de: http://media.utp.edu.co/ciebreg/archivos/bosque-seco-tropical/el-bosque-seco-tropical-en-colombia.pdf (marzo 2014).

Kahneman, Daniel & Sugden, Robert (2005). “Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 32, Issue 1, pp. 161-181.

Kideghesho, Jafari; Røskaft, Eivin & Kaltenborn, Bjørn (2007). “Factors influencing conservation attitudes of local people in Western Serengeti, Tanzania”, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 16, Issue 7, pp. 2213-2230.

Loureiro, Maria; Loomis, John & Vázquez, Maria Xosé (2009). “Economic Valuation of Environmental Damages due to the Prestige Oil Spill in Spain”, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. 537-553.

Lybbert, Travis; Aboudrare, Abdellah; Chaloud, Deborah; Magnan, Nicholas & Nash, Maliha (2011). “Booming markets for Moroccan argan oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic argan forest”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108, Issue 34, pp. 13963-13968.

Martínez-Espiñeira, Roberto & Lyssenko, Nikita (2011). “Correcting for the endogeneity of pro-environment behavioral choices in contingent valuation”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, Issue 8, pp. 1435-1439.

Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio; Maldonado, Jorge Higinio; Wunder, Sven & Borda-Almanza, Carlos (2012). “Heterogeneous users and willingness to pay in an ongoing payment for watershed protection initiative in the Colombian Andes”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 75, pp. 126-134.

Rondeau, Daniel; D. Schulze, William & Poe, Gregory L (1999). “Voluntary revelation of the demand for public goods using a provision point mechanism”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 455-470.

Rodriguez, Gina; Banda, Karina; Reyes, Sandra; Estupiñan, Ana (2012). “Lista comentada de las plantas vasculares de bosques secos prioritarios para la conservación en los departamentos de Atlántico y Bolivar (Atlántico Colombiano)”, Biota Colombiana, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 7-39.

Savage, A.; Guillen, R.; Lamilla, I. & Soto, L. (2010). “Developing an effective community conservation program for cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Colombia”, American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 72, Issue 5, pp. 379-390.

Sodhi, Navjots; Lee, TienMing; Sekercioglu, CaganH; Webb, EdwardL; Prawiradilaga, DewiM; Lohman, DavidJ; . . . Ehrlich, PaulR (2010). “Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks”, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 1175-1188.

Souto, Tamia; Deichmann, JessicaL; Núñez, Cecilia & Alonso, Alfonso (2014). “Classifying conservation targets based on the origin of motivation: implications over the success of community-based conservation projects”, Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 23, Issue 5, pp. 1331-1337.

Whittington, Dale (2010). “What Have We Learned from 20 Years of Stated Preference Research in Less-Developed Countries?”, Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 209-236.

Wilner P, Jeanty (2007). Constructing Krinsky and Robb confidence interval for mean and median willingness to pay (WTP) using STATA. 6th North American Stata Users Work Group Meetings, 8. Recuprado de: http:// repec.org/nasug2007/pwj_nasug07.pdf (marzo 2014).