The effect of creep feed and diet complexity on growth performance in suckling and weaned pigs

Authors

  • Paige K. Isensee University of Wisconsin-River Falls
  • Sarah E. Albers University of Wisconsin-River Falls
  • Lindsey G. Wichman University of Wisconsin-River Falls
  • Autumn L. Thoma University of Wisconsin-River Falls
  • Young D. Jang University of Wisconsin-River Falls

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v33n3a04

Keywords:

complex diet, creep feed, diet complexity, growth performance, litter performance, nursery diet, piglet, suckling, weaning

Abstract

Background: Creep feed is offered to suckling piglets to introduce solid feed and provide extra nutrients in late lactation. However, the effect of creep feed is inconsistent; there is little information about the effect of creep diet complexity on piglet performance. Objective: Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of creep feed and its complexity on growth performance of suckling and weaned pigs. Methods: In Exp. 1, eight litters (average 19.9 ± 1.1 d of age; initial piglet weight: 6.74 ± 1.2 kg) were allotted to two dietary treatments considering breed, litter size and weight, as follows: no creep feed (n=3) and creep feed (n=5; offered for 8 days before weaning). At weaning (d 28 of age), the pigs were divided into three treatments (6 pigs/pen, 3 replicates; initial body weight: 9.66 ± 0.34 kg) balanced by gender, body weight, and breed, as follows: creep feed eaters, creep feed non-eaters, and no creep feed. In Exp. 2, two different types of creep feed were offered to suckling piglets (initial piglet weight: 3.79 ± 0.55 kg) in seven litters from d 12 of age (average 12.0 ± 1.3 d of age) to weaning (d 25 of age). Treatments were: HCF (n=4): highly-complex creep diet containing 3% fish meal, 2.4% blood meal, and 15% whey; and 2) LCF (n=3): lowly-complex creep diet without the mentioned ingredients. At weaning, only eater pigs were divided into 2 treatments (6 pigs/pen, 3 replicates; initial body weight: 7.53 ± 0.97 kg) balanced by gender, breed and body weight as follows: HCF eaters and LCF eaters. In both experiments, creep feed was mixed with 1% Cr2O3 to measure fecal color for eater/non-eater categorization and the pigs were fed a common nursery diet for 21 days. Results: In both experiments, there were no differences on piglet weaning weight and overall nursery growth performance among the treatments. In Exp. 2, the creep feed intake and percentage of eaters per litter were not different between the HCF and LCF treatments, whereas the HCF eaters tended to have a greater average daily gain (p=0.08) and gain to feed ratio (p=0.09) than the LCF eaters during d 7-14 postweaning. Conclusion: Creep feed did not affect overall piglet growth in suckling and nursery phases, but its complexity might affect pig growth in the early nursery phase.

|Abstract
= 578 veces | HTML
= 15 veces| | PDF
= 467 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paige K. Isensee, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-4375
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

Sarah E. Albers, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-3977
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

Lindsey G. Wichman, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-2141
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

Autumn L. Thoma, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7759-8130
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

Young D. Jang, University of Wisconsin-River Falls

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-1231
Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

References

Bruininx EM, Binnendijk GP, van der Peet-Schwering CM, Schrama JW, den Hartog LA, Everts H, Beynen AC. Effect of creep feed consumption on individual feed intake characteristics and performance of group-housed weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2002; 80:1413-1418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8061413x

Cabrera RA, Usry JL, Arrellano C, Nogueira ET, Kutschenko M, Moeser AJ, Odle J. Effects of creep feeding and supplemental glutamine or glutamine plus glutamate (Aminogut) on pre- and post-weaning growth performance and intestinal health of piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 4:29.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-29

Cera KR, Mahan DC, Reinhart GA: Effect of weaning, week postweaning and diet composition on pancreatic and small intestinal luminal lipase response in young swine. J Anim Sci 1990; 68:384-391.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.682384x

Fraser D, Feddes JJR, Pajor EA. The relationship between creep feeding behavior of piglets and adaptation to weaning: Effect of diet quality. Can J Anim Sci 1994; 74:1-6.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas94-001

Heo P, Kim D, Jang J, Hong J, Kim Y. Effects of different creep feed types on pre-weaning and post-weaning performance and gut development. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018; 31:1956-1962.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0844

Kuller WI, Soede NM, van Beers-Schreurs HMG, Langendijk P, Taverne MAM, Kemp B, Verheijden JHM. Effects of intermittent suckling and creep feed intake on pig performance from birth to slaughter. J Anim Sci 2007; 85: 1295-1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-177

Lindemann MD, Cornelius SG, el Kandelgy SM, Moser RL, Pettigrew JE. Effect of age, weaning and diet on digestive enzyme levels in the piglet. J Anim Sci. 1986; 62:1298-1307.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.6251298x

Muns R, Magowan E. The effect of creep feed intake and starter diet allowance on piglets’ gut structure and growth performance after weaning. J Anim Sci. 2018; 96:3815-3823.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky239

National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2012.

Okai DB, Aherne FX, Hardin ET. Effect of creep and starter composition on feed intake and performance of young pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1976; 56:573-86.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas76-070

Palmer NC, Hulland TK: Factors predisposing to the development of coliform gastroenteritis in weaned pigs. Can Vet J 1965; 6:310-316.

Pluske JR, Hampson DJ, Williams IH. Factors influencing the structure and function of the small intestine in the weaned pig: a review. Livest Prod Sci 1997; 51:215-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00057-2

Sulabo RC, Jacela JY, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL. Effects of lactation feed intake and creep feeding on sow and piglet performance. J Anim Sci 2010a; 88:3145–3153.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2131

Sulabo RC, Tokach MD, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, DeRouchey JM, Nelssen JL. Effects of varying creep feeding duration on the proportion of pigs consuming creep feed and neonatal pig performance. J Anim Sci 2010b; 88:3154-3162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2134

Varley MA, Wiseman S. The weaner pig: nutrition and management. New York (NY) USA: CABI Publishing; 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995328.0000

Downloads

Published

2020-07-22

How to Cite

Isensee, P. K., Albers, S. E., Wichman, L. G., Thoma, A. L., & Jang, Y. D. (2020). The effect of creep feed and diet complexity on growth performance in suckling and weaned pigs. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 33(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v33n3a04

Issue

Section

Original research articles

Similar Articles

> >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.