How vets prescribe: a look at small animal practices in Colombia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e359884

Keywords:

animal welfare, companion animals, medical prescription, medication errors, patient safety, regulatory compliance, veterinarians, veterinary medicine, veterinary practices

Abstract

Background: Medical prescriptions are essential in clinical care, ensuring the appropriate use of medications for patients. In veterinary medicine, they are crucial for treating companion animals, yet proper completion and application of these prescriptions have not been systematically studied in Colombia. Despite clear national regulations, there is a lack of research on veterinarians' practices in issuing medical prescriptions for pets, highlighting the need for improved training and adherence to standards. Objective: To describe and analyze how veterinary professionals prescribe treatments in their everyday practices, assessing adherence to the standards set by national regulations. Furthermore, our study intends to identify potential errors, inconsistencies, or practices that could impact patient health and the effectiveness of treatments. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from electronically generated prescriptions at a veterinary hospital for small animals in a university setting in Medellín (Colombia) in 2022. Compliance with national regulations required prescriptions to include specific information such as the veterinarian's details, patient identification, medication specifics, and clear instructions, all presented legibly in Spanish. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables of interest. Results: A total of 1,152 prescriptions were analyzed, resulting in 3,432 substances, of which 3,108 unique entries remained after eliminating 324 duplicates. Among these, 3,106 were classified as medications. The analysis revealed significant issues in prescription practices, with 9,559 instances of incorrect reporting of prescription components, 450 cases of invalid abbreviations, and 632 instances of invalid information. The most common errors included unclear indications (78.38%), absence of quantity (in number) (73.75%), and undefined pharmaceutical forms (58.04%). Conclusion: This study enhances veterinary practices and proposes training strategies to ensure compliance with regulations. It is vital for hospitals’ role in training veterinary students, influencing their future decisions and public health. The goal is to promote rational medication use for companion animals, improve animal welfare, and strengthen veterinary medicine in Colombia.

|Abstract
= 72 veces | PDF
= 35 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan-Gonzalo Restrepo-Salazar, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, CENTAURO Research Group, Medellín, Colombia.

Nathalia M Correa-Valencia, Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, CENTAURO Research Group, Medellín, Colombia

References

Decree 2200 of 2005, Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=16944

Decree 780 of 2016, Ministry of Health and Social Protection of Colombia https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=77813

Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Veterinary Medication Errors [Internet]. 2024. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/veterinary-medication-errors

Hardefeldt LY, Holloway S, Trott DJ, Shipstone M, Barrs VR, Malik R, Burrows M, Armstrong S, Browning GF, Stevenson M. Antimicrobial prescribing in dogs and cats in Australia: results of the Australasian Infectious Disease Advisory Panel survey. J Vet Intern Med. 2017; 31(4):1100–1107. http://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14733

Mateus A, Brodbelt DC, Barber N, Stärk KDC. Antimicrobial usage in dogs and cats in first opinion veterinary practices in the UK. J Small Anim Pract. 2011; 52(10):515–521. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01098.x

Petrou E, Davies H, Aoun M, Radford AD, Singleton D, Noble PM, Killick DR. First opinion practice electronic health records are a useful source of descriptions of medication errors. Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1560652. http://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1560652

Pinho RH, Nasr-Esfahani M, Pang DSJ. Medication errors in veterinary anesthesia: a literature review. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2024; 51(3):203–226. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.01.003

Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320(7237):768–770. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768

World Health Organization (WHO). Promoting rational use of medicines: core components. WHO Policy Perspectives on Medicines. No. 5. Geneva. 2002. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/67438/WHO_EDM_2002.3.pdf

World Health Organization (WHO). Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. Geneva. 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763

Downloads

Published

2025-12-07

How to Cite

Restrepo-Salazar, J.-G., & Correa-Valencia, N. M. (2025). How vets prescribe: a look at small animal practices in Colombia. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Pecuarias. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.e359884

Issue

Section

Accepted Manuscripts