Periodicals Publications in Library, Library Science, Information Science and Documentation in Mexico: Thematic Trends, Productivity and Networks of CoAuthorship: 1956-2006
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.17636Keywords:
periodicals, México, bibliometric indicators, co-autorship networks, semantic networks, thematic mapsAbstract
Thematic analysis of periodicals related to library and information science (LIS) published in Mexico in the period from 1956 to 2006 give us the opportunity to characterize the growth, development and diversification of these disciplines. With regard to the strategy for the selection of journals to be examined from the year that begins the LIS professionalization, this was based on two phases: the first phase consisted in grouping a large set of journals devoted to topics related to the LIS field, and selecting some other titles that, without having a defined profile, published articles on these topics. In the second phase we selected a set of representative publications within the context and historical moment in which they took effect. For both sets of journals were generated the following bibliometric indicators: topics addressed by time period (networks of co-terms, from descriptor and title fields). Regarding the most productive authors we present the following indicators: productivity index, co-authorship networks, co-terms networks (from descriptor and title fields). The results will hopefully help to lead the LIS profession and related disciplines.
Downloads
References
ATKINS, S. (1988). Subject trends y library and Information Science Research,. Library Trends, 36 (4), 633-658.
BRITO BRITO, E. (1989). Bibliohemerografía, Bibliotecológica mexicana. México: UNAM, Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas, (pp.717).
DELGADO LÓPEZ-CÓZAR, E. (2002). La investigaciónen biblioteconomía y documentación. Gijón, España:
Trea. Disponible en: http://ec3.ugr.es/publicaciones/Emilio_Delgado_Lopez_Cozar_La_investigacion_en_
Biblioteconomia_y_Documentacion_Gijon_Trea_2002.pdf. (pp. 200)
GARFIELD, E. (1993). Co-Citation Analysis of the Scientific Literature: Henry Small on mapping theCollective Mind of Science. Current Comments. No.19, 3-13. Disponible el 5 de marzo de 2012, de http://www. garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v15p293y1992-93.pdf
HANNEMAN, R. y RIDDLE, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. (free introductory textbook on social network analysis). Riverside. CA : University of California. Disponible el 28 de noviembre de 2009, de
http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/>.
JÄRVELIN, K. y VAKKARI, P. (1990). Content analysisof research articles. Library and Information ScienceResearch, 12 (4), 395-421.
LICEA DE ARENAS, J. (1990). Indicadores de actividad científica en el área de la salud. México: UNAM, (pp. 71).
LICEA DE ARENAS, J. (2007). A cincuenta años de distancia. 50 años de estudios universitarios en
bibliotecología: una (re)visión de su historia. México: Sistemas Biblioinforma, 25-48.
LOTKA, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington
Academy of Sciences, 16 (12), 317-323.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac9e5/ac9e56014965b86e3987a4251abb582ec86cdd33" alt=""