Propuesta y legitimación del modelo multicriterio para la gestión de la innovación en bibliotecas

Murilo Mauro Silveira; William Barbosa Vianna; Ana Clara Cândido

doi:10.17533/udea.rib.v42n3a03

Authors

Murilo Mauro Silveira Federal University of Santa Catarina
William Barbosa Vianna Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Ana Clara Cândido Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v42n3a03

Keywords:

Innovation in libraries, innovation management, multicriteria model, Delphi technique

Abstract

The objective of the study is to propose and legitimize with the library specialists of the southern region of Brazil a formal multicriteria model for the implementation of innovation management in libraries. The importance of this research is justified by the lack of empirical studies for the implementation of innovation management in libraries as well as the participation of decision makers in this process. Regarding methodological procedures, it is characterized by its qualitative, exploratory about the object of this study, makes use of the Mutiritary Methodology in Decision Support - Constructivist (MCDA-C). Finally, the Delphi technique was used to legitimates the proposed model, with the participation of librarian specialists/managers. The results pointed to the robustness of the theoretical model by agreement with 40 elements and alerted to 2 critical points.

|Abstract

= 446 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 266 veces| | HTML (PORTUGUÊS (BRASIL))

= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Murilo Mauro Silveira, Federal University of Santa Catarina

Master's student in Information Science and graduated in Librarianship at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Specialist in Quality Engineering, Sociesc. Florianópolis - Brazil.

William Barbosa Vianna, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

PhD in Production Engineering and Master in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professional Master's in Administration (USF). Graduated in Philosophy, Dom Bosco Catholic University (UCDB). Coordinator of the Undergraduate Course in Information Science at UFSC. Florianópolis - Brazil.

Ana Clara Cândido, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

PhD in Technology Assessment - Universidade Nova de Lisboa. Master in Economics and Innovation Management, Faculty of Economics, University of Porto. Bachelor in Economic Sciences, Regional University of Blumenau Foundation. Currently a professor at the Department of Information Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina. Florianópolis - Brazil.

References

Bana-E-Costa, C. A., & Silva, F. (1994). Concepção de uma “boa” alternativa de ligação ferroviária ao Porto de Lisboa: uma aplicação da metodologia MCDA e à negociação. Investigação Operacional, 14, 115-131.

Bana-E-Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J. C. (1997). Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 6(2), 107-114.

Cândido, R., Silva, J. R., Coraiola, J. A., & Lezana, Á. G. R. (2007). Método Delphi–uma ferramenta para uso em Microempresas de Base Tecnológica. Revista da FAE, 10(2), 157-164. Recuperado de https://revistafae.fae.edu/revistafae/article/view/346/242

Deiss, K. J. (2004). Innovation and strategy: risk and choice in shaping user-centered libraries. Library trends, 53(1), 17.

Ensslin, L., Dutra, A., & Ensslin, S. R. (2000). MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency. International transactions in operational Research, 7(1), 79-100.

Ensslin, L., Montibeller N., G., & Noronha, S. M. (2001). Apoio à decisão: metodologias para estruturação de problemas e avaliação multicritério de alternativas. Florianópolis: Insular.

Ensslin, L., Giffhorn, E., Ensslin, S. R., Petri, S. M., & Vianna, W. B. (2010). Avaliação do desempenho de empresas terceirizadas com o uso da metodologia multicritério de apoio à decisão-construtivista. Pesquisa Operacional, 30(1), 125-152.

Fingerle, V. B., & Fingerle, B. (2012). Innovation zum mitmachen: Die open innovation-kampagnen der zbw mit open innovation gemeinsam mit kundinnen und kunden neuerungen in bibliotheken fördern. Bibliothek, 36(3).

Harbo, K., & Hansen, T. V. (2012). Getting to Know Library Users’ Needs. Experimental Ways to User-centred Library Innovation. Liber Quarterly, 21(3-4).

Jianzhong, W., & Chen, X. (2013). Transition and transcendence: the innovative development of Shanghai Library. Library Management, 34(1/2), 20-30.

Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision analysis. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 2(1), 49-59.

Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge: University Press.

Kostagiolas, P., Margiola, A., & Avramidou, A. (2011). A library management response model against the economic crisis: The case of public libraries in Greece. Library Review, 60(6), 486-500.

Landry, M., Banville, C., & Oral, M. (1996). Model legitimization in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 443-457.

Leonard, E., & Clementson, B. (2012). Business librarians and entrepreneurship: Innovation trends and characteristics. New Review of Information Networking, 17(1), 1-21.

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). Introducción. En H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff, The Delphi Method. Techniques and applications (pp. 3-12). Newark, NJ: New Jersey Institute of Technology.

OCDE (2005). Manual de Oslo. Diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação (3.ª ed.). OCDE, Eurostat, FINEP.

Silveira, M. M., Vianna, W. B., Cândido, A. C., & Petri, S. M. (2017).

Estruturação de elementos formais para implantação de Gestão da Inovação em Bibliotecas. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 27(3).

Silveira, M. M., Vianna, W. B., & Ensslin, S. R. (2018). Gestão da inovação em bibliotecas: elementos fundamentais de revisão de literatura internacional. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 32(76), 29-44. doi: 10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2018.76.57973

Rowley, J. (2011). Should your library have an innovation strategy? Library Management, 32(4/5), 251-265.

Roy, B. (1993). Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, 66(2), 184-203.

Roy, B., & Vanderpooten, D. (1996). The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 5(1), 22-38.

Wright, J. T. C & Giovinazzo, R. A. (2000). Delphi: uma ferramenta de apoio ao planejamento prospectivo. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração,1(12), 54-65.