The Development Degree of the Technology System of Peruvian Inventors: Patent Production (2003/2013)

Authors

  • Adilson Luiz Pinto Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Enrique Muriel-Torrado Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-9500
  • Douglas Dyllon Jeronimo de Macedo Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v41n2a06

Keywords:

Innovation, patents, Peru, patents production

Abstract

The patent registration is considered one of the industrial and scientific development indexes of countries, once used to measure the capacity of this activity in the transformation of knowledge into products, processes or technological in-novation. In view of the whole scientific, technological and innovation contexts activities in Peru, we ask: how does the patent production process behave in the country? The main focus is to identify the production of patents, as well as their inventors. The main objective of this study is to determine the degree of patent productivity in Peru. The search strate-gy was based on the Esp@cenet patent base, in the Inventors field, using the expression "[PE]" representing the country of inventor, selecting the period of study mentioned above. In a second step, a data cleansing was performed to identify if the strategy was successful, 1104 patents were identified, which were tabulated later. Among the several results of this research, an interesting observation is the predominance of US patent citations, practically monopolizing the sample. On 47 occasions the US country appears, while patents from Germany are cited 4 times and from Great Britain 2 times. During the study period, a 60 % increase in patent registra-tions was observed. The main patent producers in Peru have interesting characteristics, where one can notice a market reserve in some segments such as hygiene, consumer pro-ducts and daily life. Finally, one can identify a technological and innovation predominance in sectors where the industry is installed and that has direct interference in the products that are directed to the Peruvian population.

|Abstract
= 423 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 217 veces| | XML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 36 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Adilson Luiz Pinto, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

PhD in Documentation from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Master in Information Science from PUC-Campinas. B.A. in Library Science from PUC - Campinas. Professor at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, PGCIN - Brazil.

Enrique Muriel-Torrado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

PhD in Documentation from the University of Granada. Master in Scientific Information from the University of Granada and in Digital Documentation from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Degree in Documentation from the University of Extremadura. Professor at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, PGCIN, Brazil.

Douglas Dyllon Jeronimo de Macedo, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

PhD and master's degree in Knowledge Engineering from Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Degree in Data Processing Technology from Faculdade de Ciências Administrativas e Tecnologicas. Professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, PGCIN - Brazil.

Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola

Master in Knowledge Management from Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier III. Degree in Veterinary Medicine from Universidad Nacional de San Marcos. Researcher at Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.

References

Dias, C. C., Costa, M. C. (2008). Repartição de Benefícios em Pesquisa: Um Olhar a Partir dos Projetos de Bioprospecção. Campinas: Unicamp.

Díaz, J. J., Kuramoto, J. (2011). Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Perú: Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo. Recuperado de http://www.elecciones.cies.org.pe/ckfinder/userfiles/files/C%26TDocumento_0.pdf

Esp@cenet. (2017). Eurpean Patent Office. Recuperado de https://worldwide.espacenet.com/

Faria, L. I. L., Gregolin, J. A. R., Santos, R. N. M. (1998). Technological Information and materials selection. International Journal of Information Sciences for Decision Making, (2), 18-30.

Gonzales, L. H. (2014). Sólo el 14% de solicitudes de patentes registradas em Indecopi pertenecen a peruanos. Lima: Gestión. Recuperado de http://gestion.pe/economia/solo-14-solicitudes-patentes-registradas-indecopi-pertenecen-peruanos-211231

Hikkerova, L., Kammoun, N., Lantz, J. S. (2014). Patent livre cycle: new evidence. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 88, 313-324. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.005

Lama-Eggerstedt, M., & Lladó-Márquez, J. E. (2004). Precios y política de medicamentos en el Perú. Estudios Económicos. Banco Central de Reserva del Perú Recuperado de http://suscripciones.bcrp.gob.pe/docs/Publicaciones/Revista-Estudios-Economicos/11/Estudios-Economicos-11-5.pdf

Linares, R. L. (2004). El tratado de libre comercio y el acceso a medicamentos. Lima: Associación Internacional para la Salud.

Llamoza, J. (2009). Tratados comerciales y acceso a medicamentos en el Perú. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 26(4), 530-536. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S1726-46342009000400015&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

Mullin, J. (2002). Análisis del sistema peruano de innovación. Una contribución al desarrollo del Programa de Ciencia y Tecnología. Lima: BID.

OECD (1997). National Innovation Systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

Perú. (1968). Decreto Ley n.º 17096: Para fomentar, coordinar y orientar investigaciones de ciencia se crea “Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones”. Lima: CONI. Recuperado de http://docs.peru.justia.com/federales/decretos-leyes/17096-nov-6-1968.pdf

Perú. (1981). Ley Orgánica del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Lima: CONCYTEC. Recuperado de http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/243.pdf

Perú. (2006a). Ley n.º 28613: Ley del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica. Lima: CONCYTEC. Recuperado de http://www.planctiperu.com/LeydelCONCYTEC28613.html

Perú. (2006b). Qué es FINCyT. Lima: FINCyT. Recuperado de https://innovateperu.gob.pe/quienes-somos/nuestros-fondos/fincyt-i-y-ii

Perú. (2008). Incagro. Lima: Agrorural. Recuperado de http://www.agrorural.gob.pe/incagro/

Plancti. (2010). Propuesta para impulsar la ciencia, la tecnología, y la innovación tecnológica en el Perú. Lima: Plancti. Recuperado de http://www.planctiperu.com/propuestadepoliticasparaimpulsarcti.html

Schütz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Villarán, F. (2010). Emergencia de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación (CTI) en el Perú. Lima: OEI. Recuperado de http://www.oei.es/historico/salactsi/EmergenciaDeCtiEnPeru.pdf

Villarán, F. (2015). Historia de las patentes e invenciones en el Perú. Lima: Indecopi. Recuperado de https://www.indecopi.gob.pe/documents/20791/203175/01. Historiadelaspatentesweb.pdf/ee9da00e-ae8d-4fbf-a451-8b103dbc0d01

Wang, B., Liu, S., Ding, K., Liu, Z., & Xu, J. (2014). Identifying technological topics and institution-topic distribution probability for patent competitive intelligence analysis: a case study in LTE technology. Scientometrics, 101(1), 685-704. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-014-1342-3

Worldometers. (2017, 8 de mayo, consultado). World Population by Cointry: 2013. Recuperado de http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-countries.php

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Pinto, A. . L., Muriel-Torrado, E., Macedo, D. D. J. de, & Pacheco-Mendoza, J. (2018). The Development Degree of the Technology System of Peruvian Inventors: Patent Production (2003/2013). Revista Interamericana De Bibliotecología, 41(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v41n2a06

Issue

Section

Investigaciones