The Perception of Brazilians Researchers on the Deposit of Scientific Production in Open Access Institutional Repositories
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v42n2a04Keywords:
Scholarly communication system, institutional repositories, open accessAbstract
This work aims to present and discuss results of research about the perception of researchers regarding the deposit of scientific production in open access institutional repositories. The results presented compose results of a larger research whose purpose was to propose guidelines for the deposit of scientific production in open access institutional repositories based on the perception of the different actors that participate in the scholarly communication system. From the methodological point of view, the study has a descriptive purpose and a qualitative methodological approach, since the proposal of the guidelines was based on the perceptions of the actors involved. As a research method, the survey was adopted, which was operationalized with the adoption of the semistructured interview technique. Among the conclusions, the main motivations for depositing scientific production in institutional repositories are diversified according to the areas of knowledge. Among them are the awareness of the benefits of open access, compulsory deposit, institutional incentives and the link to culturally deposit-prone disciplines.
Downloads
References
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372-382.
Antelman, K. (2006). Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, (19), 85-95. Recuperado de http://eprints.rclis.org/7420/1/antelman_self-archiving.pdf
Babbie, E. (1999). Métodos de Pesquisa de Survey. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
BOAI. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Recuperado de http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/
Cooke, J. (2007). A visual arts perspective on open access institutional repositories. Proceedings of 23 Computers and History of Art Annual Conference. Birkbeck 8-9th November. Recuperado de http://research.gold.ac.uk/140/
Costa, S. M. S. (2005). A comunicação científica nos dias atuais: impactos de uma filosofia aberta. 57.ª Reunião Anual da SBPC. Recuperado de http://www.sbpcnet.org.br/livro/57ra/programas/CONF_SIMP/textos/selycosta.htm
Covey, D. T. (2008). Faculty self-archiving practice: a case study. Selected works. Recuperado de https://works.bepress.com/denise_troll_covey/35/ [Consulta: 23/04/2019].
Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1). Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/1802/1292
Fowler, F. J. (2011). Pesquisa de levantamento. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Freitas, M. A. (2015). Diretrizes para o depósito da produção científica em repositorios institucionais (tesis de doctorado). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT). (2005). Manifesto brasileiro de apoio ao acesso livre à informação cientifica. Recuperado de http://livroaberto.ibict.br/Manifesto.pdf
Joint, N. (2006). Institutional repositories, self-archiving and the role of the library. Library Review, 55. Recuperado de https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/00242530610649576
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K.-K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. CiteSeer. Recuperado de http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?
doi=10.1.1.123.3555
Kim, J. (2008). Faculty self-archiving behavior: factors affecting the decision to self-archive (tesis de doctorado). Universidade de Michigan, Michigan. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/61564
Martins, A. B., Nolasco, B., & Silva, D. (2013) Integração de informação e 176 interoperabilidade: o repositorio institucional como suporte à gestão da investigação na Universidade de Aveiro. R. Ci. Inf. e Doc., 4(2), 202-211.
Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J. R., Wilhelm, M. L.,… & Mahn, A. J. (2012). A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate Policies. Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 85-102. Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ975613
Xia, J., & Sun, L. (2007). Factors to Assess Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories. Serials Review, 33(2), 73-80. Recuperado de http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098791306001365