Structure of the Spanish scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science (Scopus 1999-2007)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.6283Keywords:
scientific collaboration, co authorship, collaboration networks, social network analysis, global centrality, library and information sciences, SpainAbstract
Based on documents filed in the Scopus database between 1999 and 2007, this paper identifies, displays, and analyzes the main structures of scientific collaboration by authors in the library and information sciences in Spain. We apply techniques of similarity, techniques of social network analysis, like K-core, bibliometric procedures, such as author co-occurrence and an analysis of the frequency of terms in order to explore the communities of collaboration (subnets) that make up the most important components in this area. Through this we identify 21 components composed of 28 subnets that reveal the micro-structure of a network of scientific collaboration. The network showed collaboration that was centralized in a few components. This collaboration originated in the research sector and included information retrieval and information management. This paper highlights the limited cooperation between subnets in which institutional and geographical proximity play an important role and which have scientific production and evaluation as common fronts of collaboration. The methodology used manages to present an overview of the main collaborative scientific structure of authors in Spain during the time period under study.
Downloads
References
FREEMAN, L.C. 1977. A set of measures of centrality based on betweeness. Sociometry, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 35-41.
FREEMAN, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 215-239.
GLÄNZEL, W., and SCHUBERT, A. 2004. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: MOED, H., GLÄNZEL, W. and SCHMOCH, U., eds. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
GRANOVETTER, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, p. 1360-1380.
HOU, H.; KRETSCHMER, H., and LIU, Z. 2008. The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, vol. 75, no. 2, p. 189-202.
JÄRVELIN, K., and VAKKARI, P. 1993. The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985: a content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 129- 144.
KAMADA, T. and KAWAI, S. 1989. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 7-15.
KRETSCHMER, H. 2004. Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, vol. 60, no. 3, p. 409-420.
KRETSCHMER, H., and AGUILLO, I. F. 2004. Visibility of collaboration on the Web. Scientometrics, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 405-426.
MOYA-ANEGON, F. de, et al. 2007. Coverage analysis of Scopus: a journal metric approach. Scientometrics, vol. 73, no. 1, p. 53-78.
NEWMAN, M. 2004. Who is the best connected scientist?: a study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: Ben-Naim, E.; Frauenfelder, H. and Toroczkai Z. (eds.). Complex networks. Part III Information Networks & Social Networks. Berlin: Springer, vol. 650, p. 337-370
ORTEGA, L.L., y AGUILLO, I. F. 2007. La web académica española en el contexto del espacio europeo de educación superior: estudio exploratorio. El Profesional de la Información, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 417-425.
OTTE, E. and ROUSSEAU, R. 2002. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, vol. 28, no. 6, p. 441-453.
SCImago RESEARCH GROUP. 2005. Producción española con visibilidad internacional (ISI-WOS) en Biblioteconomía y Documentación (I). El Profesional de la Información, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 459-461.
SCImago RESEARCH GROUP. 2006. Producción española con visibilidad internacional (ISI-WOS) en Biblioteconomía y Documentación (II).El Profesional de la Información, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 34-36.