Velocidade de publicação em revistas científicas colombianas: influência na produtividade e qualidade da pesquisa
influencia en la productividad y calidad de la investigación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v48n3e356753Palavras-chave:
Periódicos científicos, velocidade de publicação, avaliação por pares, processos editoriais, megajornais, indicadores de impacto científicoResumo
Este estudo examina o tempo de publicação de artigos em revistas acadêmicas colombianas e seu impacto na vida acadêmica e profissional, bem como na produtividade dos pesquisadores. É analisada a importância da velocidade de publicação na escolha dos periódicos, abordando a presença de megajornais e periódicos predatórios. A metodologia inclui a coleta e purificação de dados do SciELO Colômbia, juntamente com testes estatísticos como Rho de Spearman, box plot e Kolmogorov-Smirnov no RStudio. Os resultados revelam uma distribuição não normal dos tempos de publicação, com variações significativas entre áreas e periódicos. Observa-se um aumento nos tempos de publicação ao longo dos anos, associado ao aumento da produção de pesquisas. Destaca-se a correlação entre os tempos de publicação e os indicadores de impacto científico, embora sejam apontadas discrepâncias com estudos anteriores. Conclui-se que os editores colombianos enfrentam desafios na gestão dos tempos de publicação, exigindo atenção e possíveis soluções como a otimização dos processos editoriais e a promoção de periódicos de acesso aberto. São reconhecidas limitações do estudo, como a falta de dados completos e a escassez de pesquisas sobre o tema no país.
Downloads
Referências
Aguado-López, Eduardo; Becerril-García, Arianna (2021). El tiempo de la revisión por pares: ¿Obstáculo a la comunicación científica? Interciencia, 46(2), 56-64. https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/01_6788_A_Aguado_v46n2_9.pdf
Argilés-Bosch, Josep; Ravenda, Diego; Garcia-Blandon, Josep (2023). Empirical analysis of factors influencing delay in article acceptance in accounting journals. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 517-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1564
Behera, Bikram; Radhakrishnan, Rakesh; Mohanty, Chitta; Bellapukonda, Snigdha (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on peer review speed of anesthesiology journals: An observational study. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 37(1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_652_20
Bilalli, Besim; Munir, Rana; Abelló, Alberto (2021). A framework for assessing the peer review duration of journals: Case study in computer science. Scientometrics, 126, 545-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03742-9
Björk, Bo-Christer (2019). Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: A literature survey. Profesional de la Información, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.07
Björk, Bo-Christer; Solomon, David (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
Bourne, Philip; Polka, Jessica; Vale, Ronald; Kiley, Robert (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
Chaleplioglou, Artemis; Koulouris, Alexandros (2023). Preprint paper platforms in the academic scholarly communication environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211058908
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (2019). Sistema de clasificación de revistas mexicanas de ciencia y tecnología. https://www.revistascytconacyt.mx/
Coolidge, Harold; Lord, Robert (1971). Archibald Cary Coolidge: Life and letters. Books for Libraries Press.
Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio (2017). Evaluar revistas científicas: un afán con mucho presente y pasado e incierto futuro. En Revistas científicas: situación actual y retos de futuro (pp. 73-103). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6141777
Himmelstein, Daniel (2016, febrero 10). The history of publishing delay. dhimmel.com. https://blog.dhimmel.com/history-of-delays/
Huisman, Janine; Smits, Jeroen (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process: The author’s perspective. Scientometrics, 113(1), 633-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
Jiménez-Yañez, César; Colmenares-Díaz, Zicri (2022). ¿Qué se debe saber sobre las revistas depredadoras y piratas? Culturales, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22234/recu.20221001.ed001
Johansson, Michael; Reich, Nicholas; Meyers, Lauren; Lipsitch, Marc (2018). Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science. PLOS Medicine, 15(4), e1002549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002549
Kumar, Malhar (2014). Review of the ethics and etiquettes of time management of manuscript peer review. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9220-4
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Lee, Younsuk; Kim, KyoungOk; Lee, Yujin (2017). Publication delay of Korean medical journals. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1235-1242. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1235
Maggio, Lauren; Bynum, William; Schreiber-Gregory, Deanna; Durning, Steven; Artino, Anthony Jr. (2020). When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(3), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00576-2
Marco del Pont-Lalli, Raúl; Martínez-Navarro, Raúl (2022). Los largos tiempos de las publicaciones académicas incluidas en SciELO México. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 45(2), e344044. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v45n2e344044
Miller, Alan; Taylor, Shannon; Bedeian, Arthur (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751
Mrowinski, M., Fronczak, A., Fronczak, P., Nedic, O., & Dekanski, A. (2020). The hurdles of academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors: A case study. Scientometrics, 125, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03619-x
Nature (2020). Coronavirus: Everyone wins when patents are pooled. Nature, 581(240-241). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01441-2
Oxford Reference (2023). Publish or perish. Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780198845621.001.0001
Oyola-García, Alfredo; Chanduvi-Puicón, Willer; Quispe-Llanzo, Melisa (2015). Tiempos de demora para la publicación de artículos en una revista científica peruana. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina, 76(4), 467-468. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-55832015000500023
Panda, Saumya (2020). Article processing speed in the Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 86(5), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdvl.ijdvl_1080_20
Redalyc (2023). Sistema de Información Científica Redalyc. https://www.redalyc.org/pais.oa?id=30&tipo=indicadores
Rigby, John; Cox, Deborah; Julian, Kigongo (2018). Journal peer review: A bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1087-1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2630-5
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR). (2023). SJR country rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?year=2021
Sebo, Paul (2022). Acceptance and publication times in high-impact general medical journals. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 17, 2441-2446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-03119-1
Segarra-Saavedra, Jesús; Hidalgo-Marí, Tatiana; Tur-Viñes, Victoria (2023). Editorial time management: Peer review dates and other key dates of Spanish Communication journals. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1569
Solomon, David; Björk, Bo-Christer (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21660
Spezi, Valerie; Wakeling, Simon; Pinfield, Stephen; Creaser, Claire; Fry, Jenny; Willett, Peter (2017). Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review. Journal of Documentation, 73(2), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0082
Teixeira da Silva, Jaime; Dobránszki, Judit (2017). Excessively long editorial decisions and excessively long publication times by journals: Causes, risks, consequences, and proposed solutions. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9489-9
Yu, Y., Li, W., Xu, C., Tan, Y., Zhu, W., Zhang, B., & Liu, Z. (2022). Publication delays and associated factors in ophthalmology journals. PeerJ, 10, e14331. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14331
Zabala, Jon; González-Albo, Borja; García-García, Ana; Garrido-Domínguez, Aurora; Vidal-Liy, José; Álvarez-Díez, Luis; Hernando-Tundidor, Soledad; Mostazo-Fernández, Yara; Abejón, Teresa (2023). Evaluation and publication delay in Ibero-American scientific journals. Learned Publishing, 36(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1497
Zhang, Zhi-Qiang (2006). The making of a mega-journal in taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1385(1), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1385.1.5
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
![](/revistas/index.php/RIB/manager/setup/"http:/aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/public/site/images/revistabibliotecologia/licencia11.png)
