Smilisca phaeota (Cope, 1862) (Anura: Hylidae) tadpoles do not discriminate between siblings and non-siblings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329396Keywords:
Amphibia, Colombia, kin recognition, larval ecology, Smilisca phaeotaAbstract
Kin recognition behavior (based on the spatial affinity for siblings index [S]) was examined in Smilisca phaeota tadpoles injected with odorific substances (experimental tadpoles). According to the S index values obtained, these tadpoles did not discriminate between relatives and nonrelatives when they were presented with unfamiliar sibling and non-sibling individuals. Since these results were similar to those obtained from control tadpoles (not exposed to odorific substances), I conclude that this species does not exhibit kin recognition behavior. Ecological factors such as the predation risks to tadpoles in the puddles where they live and their behavior are discussed as possible explanations for the results presented here.
Downloads
References
Blaustein AR. 1983. Kin recognitionmechanisms: phenotypic matching orrecognition alleles? The AmericanNaturalist, 121:749-754.
Blaustein AR, OíHara RK. 1981. Geneticcontrol for sibling recognition? Nature,290:246-248.
Blaustein AR, OíHara RK. 1986. Kinrecognition in tadpoles. The ScientificAmerican, 254:108-116.
Crump ML, Vaira M. 1991. Vulnerability ofPleurodema borelli tadpoles to an avianpredator:effect of body size and density.Herpetologica, 47:316-321.
Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1966. Neotropicalhylid frogs, genus Smilisca. The Universityof Kansas Publications, Museum ofNatural History, 17:281-375.
Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1986. Biology ofamphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Company.New York, U. S. A.
Espinal TS, Montenegro E. 1963. Formacionesvegetales de Colombia. Memoriaexplicativa sobre el mapa de Colombia.Instituto Geogr·fico ìAgustÌn Codazziî.Bogot·, Colombia.
Fishwild TG, Schemidt RA, Jankens KM,Berven KA, Gamboa GJ, Richards CM.1990. Sibling recognition by larval frogs (Ranapipiens, R. sylvatica and Pseudacriscrucifer). Journal of Herpetology, 24:40-44.
Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staginganuran embryos and larvae with notes onidentification. Herpetologica, 16:183-190.
Grubb JC. 1973. Olfactory orientation in breedingMexican toads, Bufo valliceps. Copeia,1973:490-497.
GutiÈrrez-C. PDA. 2006. Embryonic olfactorylearning in larvae of Smilisca phaeota (Cope,1862) (Anura:Hylidae). Actualidades BiolÛ-gicas, 28:59-65.
Hamilton WD. 1964. The genetical evolution ofsocial behaviour I, II. Journal of TheoreticalBiology, 7:1-52.
Hepper PG, Waldman B. 1992. Embryonicolfactory learning in frogs. The QuarterlyJournal of Experimental Psychology,44B:179-197.
Heyer WR, McDiarmid RW, Weigmann DL.1975. Tadpoles, predation and pond habitatsin the tropics. Biotropica, 7:100-111.
H olmes WG, Sherman PW. 1983. Kinrecognition in animals. The AmericanScientist, 71:46-55.
Hrbacek J. 1950. On the flight reaction of tadpolesof the common toad caused by chemicalsubstances. Experentia, 6:100-102.
Jaeger RG. 1984. Agonistic behavior of the red-backed salamander. Copeia, 1984:309-314.Kattan G. 1984. Ranas del Valle del Cauca.Cespedesia, 13:316-340.
Lacy RC, Sherman PW. 1983 Kin recognition byphenotype matching. The AmericanNaturalist, 121:489-512.
Licht LE. 1967. Growth inhibition in crowdedtadpoles:intraspecific and interspecific effects.Ecology, 48:736-745.
Reeve HK. 1989. The evolution of conspecificacceptance thresholds. The AmericanNaturalist, 133:407-435.
Siegel S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics:for thebehavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.Tokyo, Japan.
Smith DC. 1986. Enhanced growth in full sibpopulation of chorus frog tadpoles. TheAmerican Zoologist, 26:8A.
Spaeti U. 1978. Development of the sensorysystems in the larval and metamorphosingEuropean grass frog (Rana temporaria L.).Journal f ̊r Hirnforschung, 19:543-575.
Vargas-S. F, Castro-HF. 1999. DistribuciÛn ypreferencias de microh·bitat en anuros(Amphibia) en bosque maduro y ·reasperturbadas en Anchicay·, PacÌficoColombiano. Caldasia, 21:95-109.
Waldman B. 1981. Sibling recognition in toadtadpoles:the role of experience. Zeitschrift f ̊rTierpsychologie, 56:341-358.
Waldman B. 1982. Sibling association amongschooling toad tadpoles:field evidence andimplications. Animal Behavior, 30:700-713.
Waldman B. 1984. Kin recognition and siblingassociation among wood frog (Ranasylvatica) tadpoles. Behavioral Ecology andSociobiology, 114:171-180.
Waldman B. 1985. Olfactory basis of kinrecognition in toad tadpoles. Journal ofComparative Physiology A, 156:565-577.
Waldman B. 1986. Preference for unfamiliarsiblings over familiar nonsiblings in Americantoad (Bufo americanus) tadpoles. AnimalBehavior, 34:48-53.
Waldman B. 1988. Ecology of kin recognition.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,19:543-571.
Waldman B. 1991. Kin recognition in amphibians.Pp. 163-219. In: Hepper PG (ed.). Kinrecognition. Cambridge University Press.Cambridge, U. S. A.
Waldman B. 2001. Kin recognition, sexualselection, and mate choice in toads. Pp.232-244. In: Ryan MJ (ed.). Anurancommunication. Smithsonian InstitutionPress. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Waldman B, Rice JE, Honeycutt RL. 1992.Kin recognition and incest avoidance intoads. The American Zoologist, 32:18-30.
Zar JH. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed.Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, U. S. A
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Actualidades Biológicas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors exclusively authorize the Actualidades Biológicas journal to edit and publish the submitted manuscript if its publication is recommended and accepted, without this representing any cost to the Journal or the University of Antioquia.
All the ideas and opinions contained in the articles are sole responsibility of the authors. The total content of the issues or supplements of the journal is protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, so they cannot be used for commercial purposes, but for educational purposes. However, please mention the Actualidades Biológicas journal as a source and send a copy of the publication in which the content was reproduced.


