Complementar, contestar, dialogar y emancipar: Una aproximación a la literatura sobre contabilidad exterior

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n78a04

Palabras clave:

contabilidad exterior, rendición de cuentas, contabilidad social y ambiental, cuentas emancipadoras

Resumen

El presente documento se aproxima y discute la literatura sobre contabilidad exterior: contabilidad sobre las entidades, producida por entidades externas. Se argumenta que dicha contabilidad es necesaria ante la necesidad de mejorar las formas de control social y la rendición de cuentas. La literatura es clasificada en cuatro categorías provenientes tanto de la misma revisión como de la discusión con ella: Sistemáticas, Militantes, Dialógicas y Emancipadoras. Se concluye que son diversos los mecanismos y los objetivos por los cuales se puede llevar a cabo una contabilidad exterior. Se plantea la necesidad de llevar a cabo más revisiones sistemáticas de contabilidad exterior en Colombia, así como mayor investigación en las formas de contabilidad exterior existentes en el país.

|Resumen
= 1346 veces | HTML
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 748 veces|

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Fabián Leonardo Quinche Martín, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores

Contador Público, Magíster en Contabilidad y Finanzas, Estudiante de Doctorado en Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Profesor Asociado, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores.

Andrés Cabrera Narváez, Universidad Central

Contador Público, Universidad del Atlántico. Estudiante de Maestría en Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Profesor Tiempo Completo, Universidad Central.

Mateo Bedoya García, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores

Contador Público, Universidad del Quindío. Estudiante de Maestría en Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Profesor Asistente, Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores.

Citas

Abdul-Baki, Z. (2019). The role of accounting in conflicts resolution. The case of PwC’s forensic audit of the Nigerian Petroleum Corporation. Managerial Auditing Journal, pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2018-1835

Adams, C. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 17(5):731-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410567791

Alexander, D., Tiron-Tudor, A. y Dragu, I. (2018). Implications of corporate accountability in civil society. The case of Rosia Montana Gold Corporation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 2(1): 145-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2017-0233

Amernic, J. (2013). Perspectives on the role of metaphor. En: The Routledge Companion to Accounting Communication (pp. 76-93). Abingdon: Routledge.

Archel, P. (2014). Perspectivas críticas de investigación en contabilidad: una revisión de la literatura y una visión personal. Conferencia presentada en Segundo Congreso Global en Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Agosto 27-29, en Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de: http://fce.unal.edu.co/congresocf/congresos-anteriores/2014.html

Archel, P. y Husillos, J. (2009). Divulgación de información social y medioambiental: Una revisión de la literatura. En: Archel, P., Husillos, J., Gil, J.M. and Rojas, W. (Eds.), Irrupciones significativas para pensar la contabilidad, Cali, Universidad del Valle, pp. 13-60.

Archel, P., Husillos, J., Larrinaga, C., y Spence, C. (2009). Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing y Accountability Journal, 22(8): 1284-1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910999319

Archel, P., Husillos, J., y Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse. Accounting Organizations and Society, 36(6): 327-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.003

Ariza, E. D. (1990). Una aproximación dialéctica de la contabilidad. Ponencia Presentada en el I Simposio Nacional de Investigación Contable y Docencia. Medellín.

Arksey, H., y O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bebbington, J. Brown, J., Frame, B., Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3): 356-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748544

Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(7): 1036-1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998

Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20: 313-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002

Brown, J. y Dillard, J. (2013). Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24: 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.001

Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J. y Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1): 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3

Burchell, S., Clubb, C. y Hopwood, A. (1985). Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(4): 381-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9

Carrasco, F., y Larrinaga, C. (1996). El poder constitutivo de la contabilidad. Consideraciones sobre la cuestión medioambiental. En: Ensayos sobre contabilidad y economía: en homenaje al profesor Ángel Sáez Torrecilla, Vol. 2 (pp. 65-84). Madrid: ICAC.

Contrafatto, M., Thomson, I., y Monk, E. A. (2015). Peru, mountains and los niños: Dialogic action, accounting and sustainable transformation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33: 117-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.009

Cooper, D. y Sherer, M. (1984). The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(3-4): 207- 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90008-4

Cooper, S. y Slack, R. (2015). Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 45(6-7): 801-840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554

Coulson, A., y Thomson, I. (2006). Accounting and sustainability, encouraging a dialogical approach; integrating learning activities, delivery mechanisms and assessment strategies. Accounting Education: an international journal, 15(3): 261-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280600850695

Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy Theory. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 161-182). London: Spiramus.

Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational Legitimacy as a Motive for Sustainability Reporting. En: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. y O’Dwyer, B. (2007) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 127-149). London: Routledge.

Denedo, M., Thomson, I. y Yonekura, A. (2017). International advocacy NGOs, counter accounting, accountability and engagement. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(6): 1309-1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2468

Denedo, M., Thomson, I. y Yonekura, A. (2019). Ecological damage, human rights and oil: local advocacy NGOs dialogic action and alternative accounting practices. Accounting Forum, 43(1): 85-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.09.001

Dey, C. (2003). Corporate ‘silent’ and ‘shadow’ social accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 23(2): 6-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969 160X.2003.9651696

Dey, C. (2007). Developing silent and shadow accounts. En: Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, ed. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, and B. O’Dwyer, 307-326, Abingdon: Routledge.

Dey, C., S. Russell, y I. Thomson. (2011). Exploring the potential of shadow accounts in problematising institutional conduct. En: Social accounting and public management. Accountability for the common good, ed. A. Ball and S. P. Ousborne, 64-75. New York: Routledge.

Dey, C., S. Russell, y I. Thomson. (2012). Problematising organisational conduct: The transformative potential of external accounting. Paper presented in British Accounting and Finance Association Scottish Group Conference, April in Glasgow.

Dey, C. y Gibbon, J. (2014). External Accounts. En: Bebbington, J., Unerman, J. y O’Dwyer (eds.) Sustainability, Accounting and Accountability (pp. 108-123). Abingdon: Routledge.

Dey, C. y Russell, S. (2014). Who speaks for the river? Exploring biodiversity accounting using an arena approach. En: Jones, M. (ed.) Accounting for Biodiversity (pp. 245- 266). Abingdon: Routledge.

Dillard, J. (2006). The Labour Process. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 271-290). London: Spiramus.

Dillard, J. y Vinnari, E. (2019). Critical dialogical accountability: from accountingbased accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62: 16-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003

Do Nascimento-Moreira, F., De Sousa-Ferreira, A. y Maia de Sequeira, R. (2017). Relatorios sombra e silencioso: estabelecendo uma agenda de pesquisa na avaliação da sustentabilidade de empresas brasileiras. Ponencia presentada en CASI 2017.

Do Nascimento-Moreira, F., De Sousa-Ferreira, A., Maia de Sequeira, R. y Reis-Irigaray, H. (2016). Sombras e Silêncio: análise dos relatórios socioambientais do setor elétrico. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestao, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49-69.

Flor, N. (2013). La contabilidad vista como dispositivo de poder: aproximación interpretativa desde la perspectiva foucaultiana. Cuadernos De Contabilidad, 14(34): 133-158. Recuperado de: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/cuacont/article/view/6071

Foucault, M. (2009). El gobierno de sí y de los otros: curso en el Collège de France (1982- 1983). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Gallhofer, S. y Haslam, J. (2003). Accounting and Emancipation. Some critical interventions. London: Routledge.

Gallhofer, S. y Haslam, J. (2019). Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: Shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 63: 1-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.01.004

Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E. and Roberts, C. (2006). The emancipatory potential of online reporting: The case of counter accounting”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(5): 681-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610689668

Georgakopoulos, G. y Thomson, I. (2008). Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(8): 1116-1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810918788

Gracia, E. (2004). Control, contabilidad y sociedad. Un asunto para repensar. Lúmina, No. 5, pp. 237-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.05.1163.2004

Grajales, J. S., Cuevas, J. J. y Usme, W. A. (2013). Balance de las publicaciones sobre IFRS en dos revistas colombianas. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 14(36), 1183-1207.

Gray, R. (1997). The practice of silent accounting. En: Building Corporate Accountability. Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, ed. S. Zadek, P. Pruzan, and R. Evans, 201-217. London: Earthscan.

Gray, R., Brennan, A. y Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38, 258-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.10.005

Harte, G. F. and Owen, D. (1987). Fighting de-industrialisation: the role of local government social audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2): 123-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90002-X

Higgins, C. (2010). Social and Environmental Reporting. A critical discourse analysis. Saarbrüken, Alemania: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Hines, R. (1988). Financial accounting. In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3): 251-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7

Hopwood, A. (1983). On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2-3): 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90035-1

Hoskin, K. (1998). Emerging accounts and accounting for management: inverting understandings of ‘the economic’. En: McKinlay, A. y Starkey, K. (eds.) Foucault, Management and Organization Theory (pp. 93-110). London: SAGE.

Hoskin, K. (2017). Getting to the Surface of Things. Foucault as theorist and historian of Management and Accounting. En: McKinlay, A. y Pezet, E. (eds.) Foucault and Managerial Governmentality. Rethinking the Management of Populations, Organizations and Individuals (pp. 33-53). London: Routledge.

Jollands, S. y Quinn, M. (2017). Politicising the sustaining of water supply in Ireland - the role of accounting concepts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(1): 164-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2018

Knights, D. y Bloom, P. (2018). Foucault. En: Roslender, R. (Ed.) The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting (pp. 91-108). Abingdon: Routledge.

Larrinaga, C. (2007). Sustainability reporting: insights from neoinstitutional theory. En: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. y O’Dwyer, B. (2007) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 150-167). London: Routledge.

Lehman, C. (2017). Unshackling accounting in prisons: race, gender and class. En: Advances in Public Interest Accounting. Accounting in Conflict: Globalization, Gender, Race and Class, 19: 89-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1041-706020160000019006

Lehman, C. Annisette, M., y Agyemang, G. (2016). Inmigration and neoliberalism: three cases and counter accounts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(1): 43-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1470

Lehman, C. Hammond, T. y Agyemang, G. (2018). Accounting for crime in the US: race, class and the spectacle of fear. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 56: 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.002

Leong, S. y Hazelton, J. (2019). Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(3): 811-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2361

Lindblom, C.K. (2010). The implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance Disclosure. En: Gray, R., Bebbington, J. and Gray, S. (Eds.), Social and Environmental Accounting. Volume II. Developing the field. (pp. 51-63). London: Sage Publications.

Lodhia, S. (2014). Towards a pragmatic social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38: 288-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.04.003

Macintosh, N. (2001). Accounting, Accountants and Accountability. Poststructuralist Positions. London: Routledge.

McDonald-Kerr, L. (2017). Water, Water, everywhere. Using silent accounting to examine accountability for a desalination project. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1): 43-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0116

Medawar, C. (1976). The social audit: a political view. Accounting, organizations and society, 1(4): 389-394. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90041-6

Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. An introduction. En: Hopwood, A., y Miller, P. (eds.) Accounting as social and institutional practice (pp. 1-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moerman, L. y Van der Laan, S. (2015). Exploring shadow accountability: the case of James Hardie and Asbestos. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 35(1): 32-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90041-6

Moll, J., Burns, J. y Major, M. (2006). Institutional Theory. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 183-206). London: Spiramus.

Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5): 477-485. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90018-9

Ocampo, C. A. (2018). Un panorama del efecto Foucault en contabilidad y gestión pública: temáticas, autores y retos de investigación desde la gubernamentalidad. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 19(47), 60-79.

Paisey, C. y Paisey, N. (2006). And they all lived happily ever after? Exploring the possibilities of mobilising the internet to promote a more enabling accounting for occupational pension schemes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(5): 719-758. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610689677

Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Deidda, E. y Funnell, W. (2019). Accounting for power and resistance: The university of Ferrara under the Fascist regime in Italy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62: 59-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.11.001

Perkiss, S., Dean, B. y Gibbons, B. (2019). Crowdsourcing Corporate Transparency through Social Accounting: Conceptualising the ‘Spotlight Account’. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 39(2): 81-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2019.1591292

Quinche, F. L. (2008). Una Evaluación Crítica a la Contabilidad Ambiental Empresarial. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, 16(1): 197-216. Recuperado de: https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/4492

Quinche, F. L. (2017). La Cuestión Ambiental en los Informes de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y el Papel de la Contabilidad. Un Análisis Crítico del Discurso a los Informes de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial de las Empresas Generadoras de Energía en Colombia en el Periodo 2003-2013. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Quinche, F. L. y Cabrera-Narváez, A. (2020). Exploring the potential links between Social and Environmental Accounting and Political Ecology, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 40(1): 53-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1730214.

Riaz, U., Burton, B. y Monk, L. (2017). Perceptions on islamic banking in the UK - Potentialities for empowerment, challenges and the role of scholars, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 47: 39-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.002

Rodrigue, M. (2014). Contrasting realities: corporate environmental disclosure and stakeholder-released information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(1): 119-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1305

Roslender, R., Marks A., y Stevenson, J. (2015). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: conflicting perspectives on the virtues of accounting for people. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27: 43-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.06.002

Russell, S., Milne, M. J., y Dey, C. (2017). Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts. Critical reflections on environmental accounting and propositions for ecologically informed accounting. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 30(7): 1426-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010

Spence, C. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing y Accountability Journal, 20(6): 855-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710830272

Skilling, P. y Tregidga, H. (2019). Accounting for the ‘working poor’: analysing the living wage debate in Aotearoa New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(7): 2031-2061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2532

Texeira de Sousa, I. (2018). A utilização do shadow e do silent report como instrumentos de evidenciação das informações socioambientais: o caso da Barragem da Samarco S.A. em Mariana (MG). Tesis de pregrado. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Thomson, I. y Bebbington, J. (2004). It doesn’t matter what you teach? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5): 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2

Thomson, I., Dey, C., y Russell, S. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 28(5): 809-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2013-1439

Tinker, A. (1985). Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting. New York: Praeger.

Tinker, A. y Neimark, M. (1987). The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917-1976. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1): 71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90017-1

Toms, S. y Sheperd, A. (2017). Accounting and social conflict: Profit and regulated working time in the British Industrial Revolution. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 49: 57-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.002

Tregidga, H. (2007). Power and Politics of Organizational Sustainable Development: An Analysis of Organisational Reporting Discourse. Tesis de Doctorado. Universidad de Otago, Dunedin, Nueva Zelanda.

Tregidga, H. (2017). ‘Speaking truth to power’: analysing shadow reporting as a form of shadow accounting. Accounting, auditing and accountability Journal, 30(3): 510-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1942

Vinnari, E. y Laine, M. (2017). The moral mechanism of counter accounts: the case of industrial animal production. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 57: 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.01.002.

Yang, D., Dumay, J. and Tweedie, D. (2020). Accounting’s role in resisting wage theft: a labour process theory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, in press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4268.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-04-30

Cómo citar

Quinche Martín, F. L., Cabrera Narváez, A., & Bedoya García, M. (2021). Complementar, contestar, dialogar y emancipar: Una aproximación a la literatura sobre contabilidad exterior. Contaduría Universidad De Antioquia, (78), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n78a04

Número

Sección

Artículos