Complémenter, répondre, dialoguer et émanciper: une approche de la littérature sur la comptabilité externe

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n78a04

Mots-clés :

comptabilité externe, responsabilisation, comptabilité sociale et environnementale, comptes émancipateurs

Résumé

Ce document discute et s’approche de la littérature sur la comptabilité externe, c’est-à-dire, la comptabilité sur les entités menée par des organismes externes. On fait valoir qu’une telle comptabilité est nécessaire compte tenu du besoin d’améliorer les formes de contrôle social et de responsabilisation. La littérature est classée en quatre catégories provenant de la même révision ainsi que de ce qui y s’en discute : Systématiques, Militantes, Dialogiques, Émancipatrices. Il est conclu que les mécanismes et les objectifs d’une comptabilité externe sont variés. Il est nécessaire donc de procéder à des examens plus systématiques de la comptabilité externe en Colombie, ainsi qu’à des recherches plus poussées sur ses formes existant dans le pays.

|Résumé
= 1347 veces | HTML (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 0 veces| | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 749 veces|

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Fabián Leonardo Quinche Martín, Fondation de l'Université Los Libertadores

Expert-comptable, Master en comptabilité et finance, doctorant en administration, Université Nationale de Colombie. Professeur associé, Fondation de l'Université Los Libertadores.

Andrés Cabrera Narváez, Université centrale

Expert-comptable, Université de l'Atlantique. Étudiant à la maîtrise en comptabilité et finance, Université Nationale de Colombie. Professeur à temps plein, Université centrale.

Mateo Bedoya García, Fondation de l'Université Los Libertadores

Expert-comptable, Université de Quindío. Étudiant à la maîtrise en comptabilité et finance, Université nationale de Colombie. Professeur assistant, Fondation de l'Université Los Libertadores.

Références

Abdul-Baki, Z. (2019). The role of accounting in conflicts resolution. The case of PwC’s forensic audit of the Nigerian Petroleum Corporation. Managerial Auditing Journal, pp. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2018-1835

Adams, C. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 17(5):731-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410567791

Alexander, D., Tiron-Tudor, A. y Dragu, I. (2018). Implications of corporate accountability in civil society. The case of Rosia Montana Gold Corporation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 2(1): 145-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2017-0233

Amernic, J. (2013). Perspectives on the role of metaphor. En: The Routledge Companion to Accounting Communication (pp. 76-93). Abingdon: Routledge.

Archel, P. (2014). Perspectivas críticas de investigación en contabilidad: una revisión de la literatura y una visión personal. Conferencia presentada en Segundo Congreso Global en Contabilidad y Finanzas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Agosto 27-29, en Bogotá, Colombia. Recuperado de: http://fce.unal.edu.co/congresocf/congresos-anteriores/2014.html

Archel, P. y Husillos, J. (2009). Divulgación de información social y medioambiental: Una revisión de la literatura. En: Archel, P., Husillos, J., Gil, J.M. and Rojas, W. (Eds.), Irrupciones significativas para pensar la contabilidad, Cali, Universidad del Valle, pp. 13-60.

Archel, P., Husillos, J., Larrinaga, C., y Spence, C. (2009). Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing y Accountability Journal, 22(8): 1284-1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910999319

Archel, P., Husillos, J., y Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse. Accounting Organizations and Society, 36(6): 327-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.003

Ariza, E. D. (1990). Una aproximación dialéctica de la contabilidad. Ponencia Presentada en el I Simposio Nacional de Investigación Contable y Docencia. Medellín.

Arksey, H., y O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Bebbington, J. Brown, J., Frame, B., Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(3): 356-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748544

Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(7): 1036-1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998

Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20: 313-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002

Brown, J. y Dillard, J. (2013). Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24: 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.001

Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J. y Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1): 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3

Burchell, S., Clubb, C. y Hopwood, A. (1985). Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(4): 381-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9

Carrasco, F., y Larrinaga, C. (1996). El poder constitutivo de la contabilidad. Consideraciones sobre la cuestión medioambiental. En: Ensayos sobre contabilidad y economía: en homenaje al profesor Ángel Sáez Torrecilla, Vol. 2 (pp. 65-84). Madrid: ICAC.

Contrafatto, M., Thomson, I., y Monk, E. A. (2015). Peru, mountains and los niños: Dialogic action, accounting and sustainable transformation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33: 117-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.009

Cooper, D. y Sherer, M. (1984). The value of corporate accounting reports: arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(3-4): 207- 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90008-4

Cooper, S. y Slack, R. (2015). Reporting practice, impression management and company performance: a longitudinal and comparative analysis of water leakage disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 45(6-7): 801-840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1081554

Coulson, A., y Thomson, I. (2006). Accounting and sustainability, encouraging a dialogical approach; integrating learning activities, delivery mechanisms and assessment strategies. Accounting Education: an international journal, 15(3): 261-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280600850695

Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy Theory. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 161-182). London: Spiramus.

Deegan, C. (2007). Organizational Legitimacy as a Motive for Sustainability Reporting. En: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. y O’Dwyer, B. (2007) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 127-149). London: Routledge.

Denedo, M., Thomson, I. y Yonekura, A. (2017). International advocacy NGOs, counter accounting, accountability and engagement. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(6): 1309-1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2468

Denedo, M., Thomson, I. y Yonekura, A. (2019). Ecological damage, human rights and oil: local advocacy NGOs dialogic action and alternative accounting practices. Accounting Forum, 43(1): 85-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.09.001

Dey, C. (2003). Corporate ‘silent’ and ‘shadow’ social accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 23(2): 6-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969 160X.2003.9651696

Dey, C. (2007). Developing silent and shadow accounts. En: Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, ed. J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, and B. O’Dwyer, 307-326, Abingdon: Routledge.

Dey, C., S. Russell, y I. Thomson. (2011). Exploring the potential of shadow accounts in problematising institutional conduct. En: Social accounting and public management. Accountability for the common good, ed. A. Ball and S. P. Ousborne, 64-75. New York: Routledge.

Dey, C., S. Russell, y I. Thomson. (2012). Problematising organisational conduct: The transformative potential of external accounting. Paper presented in British Accounting and Finance Association Scottish Group Conference, April in Glasgow.

Dey, C. y Gibbon, J. (2014). External Accounts. En: Bebbington, J., Unerman, J. y O’Dwyer (eds.) Sustainability, Accounting and Accountability (pp. 108-123). Abingdon: Routledge.

Dey, C. y Russell, S. (2014). Who speaks for the river? Exploring biodiversity accounting using an arena approach. En: Jones, M. (ed.) Accounting for Biodiversity (pp. 245- 266). Abingdon: Routledge.

Dillard, J. (2006). The Labour Process. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 271-290). London: Spiramus.

Dillard, J. y Vinnari, E. (2019). Critical dialogical accountability: from accountingbased accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62: 16-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003

Do Nascimento-Moreira, F., De Sousa-Ferreira, A. y Maia de Sequeira, R. (2017). Relatorios sombra e silencioso: estabelecendo uma agenda de pesquisa na avaliação da sustentabilidade de empresas brasileiras. Ponencia presentada en CASI 2017.

Do Nascimento-Moreira, F., De Sousa-Ferreira, A., Maia de Sequeira, R. y Reis-Irigaray, H. (2016). Sombras e Silêncio: análise dos relatórios socioambientais do setor elétrico. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestao, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 49-69.

Flor, N. (2013). La contabilidad vista como dispositivo de poder: aproximación interpretativa desde la perspectiva foucaultiana. Cuadernos De Contabilidad, 14(34): 133-158. Recuperado de: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/cuacont/article/view/6071

Foucault, M. (2009). El gobierno de sí y de los otros: curso en el Collège de France (1982- 1983). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Gallhofer, S. y Haslam, J. (2003). Accounting and Emancipation. Some critical interventions. London: Routledge.

Gallhofer, S. y Haslam, J. (2019). Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: Shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 63: 1-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.01.004

Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., Monk, E. and Roberts, C. (2006). The emancipatory potential of online reporting: The case of counter accounting”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(5): 681-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610689668

Georgakopoulos, G. y Thomson, I. (2008). Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(8): 1116-1143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810918788

Gracia, E. (2004). Control, contabilidad y sociedad. Un asunto para repensar. Lúmina, No. 5, pp. 237-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.05.1163.2004

Grajales, J. S., Cuevas, J. J. y Usme, W. A. (2013). Balance de las publicaciones sobre IFRS en dos revistas colombianas. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 14(36), 1183-1207.

Gray, R. (1997). The practice of silent accounting. En: Building Corporate Accountability. Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, ed. S. Zadek, P. Pruzan, and R. Evans, 201-217. London: Earthscan.

Gray, R., Brennan, A. y Malpas, J. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38, 258-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.10.005

Harte, G. F. and Owen, D. (1987). Fighting de-industrialisation: the role of local government social audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2): 123-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90002-X

Higgins, C. (2010). Social and Environmental Reporting. A critical discourse analysis. Saarbrüken, Alemania: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Hines, R. (1988). Financial accounting. In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3): 251-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7

Hopwood, A. (1983). On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2-3): 287-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(83)90035-1

Hoskin, K. (1998). Emerging accounts and accounting for management: inverting understandings of ‘the economic’. En: McKinlay, A. y Starkey, K. (eds.) Foucault, Management and Organization Theory (pp. 93-110). London: SAGE.

Hoskin, K. (2017). Getting to the Surface of Things. Foucault as theorist and historian of Management and Accounting. En: McKinlay, A. y Pezet, E. (eds.) Foucault and Managerial Governmentality. Rethinking the Management of Populations, Organizations and Individuals (pp. 33-53). London: Routledge.

Jollands, S. y Quinn, M. (2017). Politicising the sustaining of water supply in Ireland - the role of accounting concepts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(1): 164-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2018

Knights, D. y Bloom, P. (2018). Foucault. En: Roslender, R. (Ed.) The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting (pp. 91-108). Abingdon: Routledge.

Larrinaga, C. (2007). Sustainability reporting: insights from neoinstitutional theory. En: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. y O’Dwyer, B. (2007) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 150-167). London: Routledge.

Lehman, C. (2017). Unshackling accounting in prisons: race, gender and class. En: Advances in Public Interest Accounting. Accounting in Conflict: Globalization, Gender, Race and Class, 19: 89-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1041-706020160000019006

Lehman, C. Annisette, M., y Agyemang, G. (2016). Inmigration and neoliberalism: three cases and counter accounts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(1): 43-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1470

Lehman, C. Hammond, T. y Agyemang, G. (2018). Accounting for crime in the US: race, class and the spectacle of fear. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 56: 63-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.002

Leong, S. y Hazelton, J. (2019). Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(3): 811-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2361

Lindblom, C.K. (2010). The implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance Disclosure. En: Gray, R., Bebbington, J. and Gray, S. (Eds.), Social and Environmental Accounting. Volume II. Developing the field. (pp. 51-63). London: Sage Publications.

Lodhia, S. (2014). Towards a pragmatic social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38: 288-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.04.003

Macintosh, N. (2001). Accounting, Accountants and Accountability. Poststructuralist Positions. London: Routledge.

McDonald-Kerr, L. (2017). Water, Water, everywhere. Using silent accounting to examine accountability for a desalination project. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(1): 43-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0116

Medawar, C. (1976). The social audit: a political view. Accounting, organizations and society, 1(4): 389-394. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90041-6

Miller, P. (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. An introduction. En: Hopwood, A., y Miller, P. (eds.) Accounting as social and institutional practice (pp. 1-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moerman, L. y Van der Laan, S. (2015). Exploring shadow accountability: the case of James Hardie and Asbestos. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 35(1): 32-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90041-6

Moll, J., Burns, J. y Major, M. (2006). Institutional Theory. En: Hoque, Z. (Ed.) Methodological Issues in Accounting Research (pp. 183-206). London: Spiramus.

Morgan, G. (1988). Accounting as reality construction: towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5): 477-485. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90018-9

Ocampo, C. A. (2018). Un panorama del efecto Foucault en contabilidad y gestión pública: temáticas, autores y retos de investigación desde la gubernamentalidad. Cuadernos de Contabilidad, 19(47), 60-79.

Paisey, C. y Paisey, N. (2006). And they all lived happily ever after? Exploring the possibilities of mobilising the internet to promote a more enabling accounting for occupational pension schemes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(5): 719-758. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610689677

Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Deidda, E. y Funnell, W. (2019). Accounting for power and resistance: The university of Ferrara under the Fascist regime in Italy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62: 59-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.11.001

Perkiss, S., Dean, B. y Gibbons, B. (2019). Crowdsourcing Corporate Transparency through Social Accounting: Conceptualising the ‘Spotlight Account’. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 39(2): 81-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2019.1591292

Quinche, F. L. (2008). Una Evaluación Crítica a la Contabilidad Ambiental Empresarial. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas: Investigación y Reflexión, 16(1): 197-216. Recuperado de: https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/4492

Quinche, F. L. (2017). La Cuestión Ambiental en los Informes de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial y el Papel de la Contabilidad. Un Análisis Crítico del Discurso a los Informes de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial de las Empresas Generadoras de Energía en Colombia en el Periodo 2003-2013. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Quinche, F. L. y Cabrera-Narváez, A. (2020). Exploring the potential links between Social and Environmental Accounting and Political Ecology, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 40(1): 53-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1730214.

Riaz, U., Burton, B. y Monk, L. (2017). Perceptions on islamic banking in the UK - Potentialities for empowerment, challenges and the role of scholars, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 47: 39-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.002

Rodrigue, M. (2014). Contrasting realities: corporate environmental disclosure and stakeholder-released information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(1): 119-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1305

Roslender, R., Marks A., y Stevenson, J. (2015). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: conflicting perspectives on the virtues of accounting for people. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27: 43-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.06.002

Russell, S., Milne, M. J., y Dey, C. (2017). Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts. Critical reflections on environmental accounting and propositions for ecologically informed accounting. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 30(7): 1426-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010

Spence, C. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing y Accountability Journal, 20(6): 855-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710830272

Skilling, P. y Tregidga, H. (2019). Accounting for the ‘working poor’: analysing the living wage debate in Aotearoa New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(7): 2031-2061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2532

Texeira de Sousa, I. (2018). A utilização do shadow e do silent report como instrumentos de evidenciação das informações socioambientais: o caso da Barragem da Samarco S.A. em Mariana (MG). Tesis de pregrado. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Thomson, I. y Bebbington, J. (2004). It doesn’t matter what you teach? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4–5): 609-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2

Thomson, I., Dey, C., y Russell, S. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting, auditing and accountability journal, 28(5): 809-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2013-1439

Tinker, A. (1985). Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting. New York: Praeger.

Tinker, A. y Neimark, M. (1987). The role of annual reports in gender and class contradictions at General Motors: 1917-1976. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1): 71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90017-1

Toms, S. y Sheperd, A. (2017). Accounting and social conflict: Profit and regulated working time in the British Industrial Revolution. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 49: 57-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.03.002

Tregidga, H. (2007). Power and Politics of Organizational Sustainable Development: An Analysis of Organisational Reporting Discourse. Tesis de Doctorado. Universidad de Otago, Dunedin, Nueva Zelanda.

Tregidga, H. (2017). ‘Speaking truth to power’: analysing shadow reporting as a form of shadow accounting. Accounting, auditing and accountability Journal, 30(3): 510-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1942

Vinnari, E. y Laine, M. (2017). The moral mechanism of counter accounts: the case of industrial animal production. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 57: 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.01.002.

Yang, D., Dumay, J. and Tweedie, D. (2020). Accounting’s role in resisting wage theft: a labour process theory analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, in press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4268.

Publié-e

2021-04-30

Comment citer

Quinche Martín, F. L., Cabrera Narváez, A., & Bedoya García, M. (2021). Complémenter, répondre, dialoguer et émanciper: une approche de la littérature sur la comptabilité externe. Contaduría Universidad De Antioquia, (78), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n78a04

Numéro

Rubrique

Artículos