Ética e sustentabilidade na gestão contábil: Uma análise documental no contexto Mundial nos períodos 2009 - 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rc.n75a02Palavras-chave:
ética, sustentabilidade, contabilidade e comportamentos éticosResumo
O trabalho teve como objetivo analisar as principais características bibliográficas da produção científica mundial relacionada com ética e sustentabilidade na gestão contábil, a partir de uma análise descritiva da evolução quantitativa das publicações, citas, redes de colaboração internacional, produtividade dos principais autores e termos frequentes nas publicações de revistas científicas. Foi realizada uma análise documental sustentada no uso das ferramentas de análise bibliométrica, baseada em informação de publicações de revistas científicas indexadas em Web Of Science (WOS) e a utilização do software conhecido como VOSviewer, que facilita a visualização de mapas bibliométricos. Esta metodologia de pesquisa, inserida no campo de meta-estudos reflexivos de literatura, permite obter uma visão geral das tendências das pesquisas científicas relacionadas com ética e sustentabilidade. Efetivamente, o estudo dá informação sobre as principais redes de colaboração e os clusters temáticos da produção científica a partir da exploração da literatura académica disponível em WOS. Os resultados identificam 98 documentos científicos entre os períodos 2009-2018 que somam um total de 3.020 citas, entre os que sobressaem duas publicações que têm a maior visibilidade por número de citas: 1) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Parmar et al., 2010) e 2) Sustainability in mining, minerals and energy: new processes, pathways and human interactions for a cautiously optimistic future (Moran, CJ; Lodhia, S; Kunz, NC; Huisingh, D, 2014). Do mesmo modo, estabeleceu-se que a revista com maior visibilidade é Academy of Management Annals, dos Estados Unidos, na qual tratam-se assuntos de administração e economia. Sobre as futuras linhas de estudos evidenciam-se: Sustentabilidade empresarial, Ética e transformação organizacional e visão social ética. As limitações do estudo centram-se na estratégia metodológica proposta pelos autores, ao limitar a pesquisa e seleção de publicações relacionadas a uma base de dados WOS só, dada a possibilidade de que existam alguns estudos com valiosos aportes sem estar indexados na base de dados.
Downloads
Referências
Almeida, C., Agostinho, F., Giannetti, B., y Huisingh, D. (2015). Integrating cleaner production into sustainability strategies: An introduction to this special volume. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.083.
Belvert, N., Powers, M., y Crosson, S. (2009). Principles of accounting. Family Systems Medicine (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091841.
Bordt, M. (2018). Discourses in Ecosystem Accounting: A Survey of the Expert Community. Ecological Economics, 144, 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.032.
Caglio, A., y Cameran, M. (2017). Is it Shameful to be an Accountant? GenMe Perception(s) of Accountants’ Ethics. Abacus, 53(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12098.
Cambra-Fierro, J., y Ruiz-Benítez, R. (2003). Sustainable business practices in Spain: A two-case study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310467320.
Cañas-Vallejo, S., Castaño-Pérez, V. , y Tamayo-Ramírez, H. (2011). El contador público y su proceso de formación ética y social. Revista Visión Contable, 9, 97–106. Disponible en http://publicaciones.unaula.edu.co/index.php/VisionContable/article/view/357.
Corazza, L. (2017). The standardization of down-Streamed Small Business Social Responsibility (SBSR): SMEs and their sustainability reporting practices. Information Resources Management Journal, 30(4), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2017100103.
Dellaportas, S. (2014). The effect of a custodial sentence and professional disqualification on reintegration. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(8), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.03.005.
Desai, R., y Roberts, R. (2013). Deficiencies in the Code of Conduct: The AICPA Rhetoric Surrounding the Tax Return Preparation Outsourcing Disclosure Rules. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1329-z.
Díaz-Campo, J. (2018). Análisis bibliométrico de las tesis doctorales sobre Ética de los Medios de Comunicación presentadas en España (1979-2013). Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudios de Comunicación y Ciencias Sociales, (20), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n20a3.
Dillard, J. (2015). Broadening out and opening up: an agonistic attitude toward progressive social accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2014-0055.
Easterly, L., y Miesing, P. (2009). NGOs, Social Venturing, and Community Citizenship Behavior. Business & Society, 48(4), 538–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650308317385.
Ehnert, I., Harry, W., y Zink, K. J. (2018). Sustainability and Human Resource Management - Developing Sustainable Business Organizations. NHRD Network Journal, 6(4), 81-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920130413.
Falagas, M., Pitsouni, E., Malietzis, G., y Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
Fatemi, D., Hasseldine, J., y Hite, P. (2018). The Influence of Ethical Codes of Conduct on Professionalism in Tax Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4081-1.
Fix, J., Odell, J., Sina, B., Meslin, E. M., Goodman, K., y Upshur, R. (2013). A Bibliometric Analysis of an International Research Ethics Trainee Program. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(5), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.75.
Fuentes, D., García, H., y Toscano, A.(2018). Estado actual de la implementación de las Normas Internacionales de Información Financieras (NIIF) en PyMEs de la ciudad de Montería , Colombia. Faces, 24(51), 1–16.
Hens, L., Block, C., Cabello-Eras, J., Sagastume-Gutierez, A., Garcia-Lorenzo, D., Chamorro, C., y Vandecasteele, C. (2018). On the evolution of “Cleaner Production” as a concept and a practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3323–3333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.082.
Jamal, K., Chen, H., y Luo, L. (2015). Are evaluations of audit quality influenced by management’s intentions and outcomes? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2014.928988.
Jenkins, J., Popova, V., y Sheldon, M. (2018). In support of public or private interests? An examination of sanctions imposed under the AICPA code of professional conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(2), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3308-2.
Kaspereit, T., y Lopatta, K. (2016). The Value Relevance of SAM’s Corporate Sustainability Ranking and GRI Sustainability Reporting in the European Stock Markets. Business Ethics: A european review, 1(25), 1-24. DOI: 10.1111/beer.12079.
Köseoglu, M., Sehitoglu, Y., Ross, G., y Parnell, J. A. (2016). The evolution of business ethics research in the realm of tourism and hospitality: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1598–1621. DOI 10.1108/IJCHM-04-2015-0188
Köseoglu, M., Yildiz, M., y Ciftci, T. (2017). Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12177.
Larrán-Jorge, M., y Andrades-Peña, F. (2014). La oferta de asignaturas de responsabilidad social corporativa y ética empresarial en las titulaciones de finanzas y contabilidad: análisis comparativo con el ámbito de la gestión de organizaciones. Revista de Contabilidad, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2013.10.001.
Latan, H., Chiappetta-Jabbour, C. J., y Lopes-de-Sousa-Jabbour, A. (2019). Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2.
Lehman, C. (2013). Knowing the unknowable and contested terrains in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.03.005.
Leiva, R., Ferrero, I., y Calderón, R. (2016). Corporate reputation in the business ethics field: Its relation with corporate identity, corporate image, and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 19(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0008-x.
Lisi, I. (2015). Translating environmental motivations into performance: The role of environmental performance measurement systems. Management Accounting Research, 29, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001.
Maldonado-Calero, J., y Viteri-Martinez, M. (2016). Contabilidad, responsabilidad social corporativa y sostenibilidad. Revista Publicando, 3(9), 579–588.
Martínez-Ávila, D., Guimarães, J., Pinho, F., y Fox, M. (2015). The Representation of Ethics and Knowledge Organization in the WoS and LISTA Databases. Knowledge Organization, 42(5), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-269.
Mintz, S., Dang, L., y Savage, A. (2013). Ethics of Relationships between Accounting Academics and External Sponsors. American Accounting Association, 28(3), 555-580. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50471.
Montesdeoca, M., Medina, A., y Santana, F. (2019). Research topics in accounting fraud in the 21st century: A state of the art. Sustainability, 11(6), 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061570.
Moran, C., Lodhia, S., Kunz, N. C., y Huisingh, D. (2014). Sustainability in mining, minerals and energy: New processes, pathways and human interactions for a cautiously optimistic future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.016.
Nerandzic, B., Perovicy, V., y Zivkov, E. (2015). Personality and Moral Character Traits and Acknowledging the Principles of Management Ethics, Auditing and Accounting Ethics. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 25(1), 288–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2012.11517566.
Nightingale, J., y Marshall, G. (2013). Reprint of ‘Citation analysis as a measure of article quality, journal influence and individual researcher performance’. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.02.005.
Parmar, B., Freeman, R., Harrison, S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., y Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory : The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581.
Pérez-López, D., Moreno-Romero, A., y Barkemeyer, R. (2015). Exploring the Relationship between Sustainability Reporting and Sustainability Management Practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1841.
Roslender, R., y Robin, R. (2018). The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting. The Routledge Companion to Critical Accounting, (May). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775203.
Saner, M., y Bordt, M. (2016). Building the consensus: The moral space of earth measurement. Ecological Economics, 130, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.019.
Schneider, A. (2014). Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2058-2.
Schneider, A., y Meins, E. (2012). Two Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability Assessment: Towards a Comprehensive Framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.726.
Seguí-Más, E., Jiménez-Arribas, I., y Tormo-Carbó, G. (2017). Análisis bibliométrico de la integración de la competencia “ética y responsabilidad profesional” en el ámbito de la docencia de la Dirección de Empresas. https://doi.org/10.4995/inred2017.2017.6839.
Shafer, W. (2015). Ethical climate, social responsibility, and earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1989-3.
Sisaye, S. (2011). Ecological systems approaches to sustainability and organizational development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32 (4), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134652.
Sisaye, S. (2012). An ecological approach for the integration of sustainability into the accounting education and professional practice. Advances in Management Accounting, 20, 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7871(2012)0000020009.
Soderstrom, K., Soderstrom, N., y Stewart, C. (2017). Sustainability/CSR research in management accounting: A review of the literature. Advances in Management Accounting, 28, 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120170000028003.
Toscano-Hernández, A., Fuentes-Doria, D., y Murillo-Vanegas, V. (2018). Contabilidad Ambiental y Sostenibilidad en las Organizaciones : Redes de colaboración y clúster temáticos de la producción científica mundial. Innovar, Estrategia de Sostenibilidad para el Crecimiento y Desarrollo Empresarial, 1, 62–78.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., y Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111 /1467-8551.00375.
Truant, E., Corazza, L., y Scagnelli, S. (2017). Sustainability and risk disclosure: An exploratory study on sustainability reports. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040636.
Tse, J., Schrader, D., Ghosh, D., Liao, T., y Lundie, D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of privacy and ethics in IEEE Security and Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-015-9369-6.
Tunca, K., y Turkey, E. (2019). Ethics and Sustainability in Accounting and Finance, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3203-6.
Unegbu, A. (2014). Theories of Accounting: Evolution y Developments, Income-Determination and Diversities in Use, 5(19), 1–16.
Vinnari, E., y Laine, M. (2017). The moral mechanism of counter accounts: The case of industrial animal production. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 57, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.01.002.
Walker, S. (2017). Accountants and the pursuit of the national interest: A study of role conflict during the First World War. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 47(2016), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.01.001.
West, A. (2017). The ethics of professional accountants: an Aristotelian perspective. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(2), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2015-2233.
Wyatt, A. (2003). Accounting professionalism—they just don’t get it. Accounting Horizons, 67(6), 14–21.
Yetmar, S., y Eastman, K. (2013). Practitioners’ Ethical Sensitivity : Empirical A Model and, 26(4), 271–288.
Yoo, T., y Nam, G. (2015). An expanded accounting framework for sustainable growth: Focus on the relationship between a focal firm and its stakeholders. SAJEMS, 18, 366–379.
Zhu, W., y Wang, Z. (2018). The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability : A Bibliometric Review. Sustainability, 10(5), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051510.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Contaduría Universidad de Antioquia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los derechos de autor sobre los artículos son cedidos a la Universidad de Antioquia para disponer de resúmenes y el texto completo en bases de datos que difunden los contenidos de cada edición. Sin embargo, los autores podrán hacer difusión de sus trabajos publicados en la revista a través de sus páginas personales y repositorios institucionales.