Anxiety and performance of nursing students in regard to assessment via clinical simulations in the classroom versus filmed assessments

Authors

  • Carla Regina de Souza Teixeira RN, Ph.D. Professor, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (EERP-USP), Brazil. email: carlarst@eerp.usp.br.
  • Luciana Kusumota RN, Ph.D. Professor, EERP-USP, Brazil. email: kusumota@eerp.usp.br.
  • Marta Cristiane Alves Pereira RN, Ph.D. Professor, EERP-USP, Brazil. email: martacris@eerp.usp.br.
  • Fernanda Titareli Merizio Martins Brag RN, Ph.D. Professor, EERP-USP, Brazil. email: titareli@eerp.usp.br.
  • Vanessa Pirani Gaioso RN, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, United States of America. email: vgaioso@uab.edu.
  • Cristina Mara Zamarioli RN, Marter candidate. EERP-USP, Brazil. email: cristinazamarioli@usp.br.
  • Emilia Campos de Carvalho RN, Ph.D. Professor, EERP-USP, Brazil. email: ecdcava@usp.br.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.19966

Keywords:

Teaching, teaching materials, nursing, simulation, anxiety.

Abstract

Objective. To compare the level of anxiety and performance of nursing students when performing a clinical simulation through the traditional method of assessment with the presence of an evaluator and through a filmed assessment without the presence of an evaluator.

Method. Controlled trial with the participation of Brazilian public university 20 students who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a) assessment through the traditional method with the presence of an evaluator; or b) filmed assessment. The level of anxiety was assessed using the Zung test and performance was measured based on the number of correct answers.

Results. Averages of 32 and 27 were obtained on the anxiety scale by the group assessed through the traditional method before and after the simulation, respectively, while the filmed group obtained averages of 33 and 26; the final scores correspond to mild anxiety. Even though there was a statistically significant reduction in the intra-groups scores before and after the simulation, there was no difference between the groups. As for the performance assessments in the clinical simulation, the groups obtained similar percentages of correct answers (83% in the traditional assessment and 84% in the filmed assessment) without statistically significant differences.

Conclusion. Filming can be used and encouraged as a strategy to assess nursing undergraduate students.

|Abstract
= 655 veces | RESUMEN | RESUMO
= 13 veces| | PDF(ENGLISH)
= 243 veces| | HTML(ENGLISH)
= 43 veces| | HTML(PORTUGUES)
= 61 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Troncon LEA. Utilização de pacientes simulados no ensino e na avaliação de habilidades clínicas. Med Ribeirão Preto. 2007; 40(2):180-9.

(2) Lunney M. Coleta de dados, julgamento clínico e diagnósticos de enfermagem: como determinar diagnósticos precisos. In: Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA: definições e classificações 2012-2014 / [NANDA International] Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2013. p.113-33.

(3) Stroup C. Simulation usage in nursing fundamentals: integrative literature review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013; 10(3):155-64

(4) Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005; 26(2):96–103.

(5) Santos MC, Leite MCL. A avaliação das aprendizagens na prática da simulação em enfermagem como feedback de ensino. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2010; 31(3):552-6.

(6) Jeffries PR, Mcnelis AM, Wheeler CA. Simulation as a vehicle for enhancing collaborative practice models. Crit Care Nurse Clin North Am. 2008; 20(4):471-80.

(7) Ziv A, Ben-David S, Ziv M. Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors. Med Teach. 2005; 27:193-9.

(8) Reilly A, Spratt S. The perceptions of under graduate student nurses of high-fidelity simulation based learning: a case report from the University of Tasmania. Nurse Educ Today. 2007; 27(6):542–50.

(9) Barsuk JH, Mcgaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(1):2697-701.

(10) Mizoi CS, Kaneko RMU, Filho CAM. A simulação realística como estratégia de treinamento para profissionais da saúde. Educ Contin Saúde. 2007; 5(32):100-1.

(11) Teixeira INDO, Felix JVC. Simulação como estratégia de ensino em enfermagem: revisão de literatura. Interface. 2011; 15( 39):1173-84.

(12) Pug CM, Iannitelli KB, Rooney D, Salud L. Use of manikin-based simulation to decrease student anxiety prior to interacting with male teaching associates. Teach Learn Med. 2012, 24(2):122-7.

(13) Suliman WA, Halabi J. Critical thinking, self-esteem, and state anxiety of nursing students. Nurs Educ Today. 2007; 27(2):162–8.

(14) Barbosa SL, Ferreira MER, Teixeira BMG. Promoción de un ambiente de aprendizaje positivo. Invest Educ Enferm. 2008; 26(2):106-12.

(15) Mitre SM, Siqueira-Batista R, Girardi-Mendonça JM, Morais-Pinto NM, Meirelles CAB, Pinto-Porto C et al. Metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem na formação profissional em saúde: debates atuais. Ciênc. Saúde coletiva. 2008; 13(2):2133-44.

(16) Beischel KP. Variables affecting learning in a simulation experience: a mixed methods study. West J Nurs Res. 2013; 35(2):226-47..

(17) Gaba DV. The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2-10.

(18) Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders,” Psychosomatics. 1971; 12(6):371–9.

(19) Schall R. Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika. 1991; 78:719-7.

(20) Almeida ML, Peres AM. Conhecimentos, habilidades e atitudes sobre a gestão dos formados de enfermagem de uma universidade pública brasileira. Invest Educ Enferm. 2012; 30(1):66-76.

(21) Silva CMC, Sabóia VM, Teixeira ER. O ensino do exame físico em suas dimensões técnicas e subjetivas. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2010; 18(3):458-65.

(22) Moscaritolo LM. Interventional strategies to decrease nursing student anxiety in the clínical learning environment. J Nurs Educ. 2009; 48(1):17-23.

(23) Hutchinson TL, Goodin HJ. Nursing Student Anxiety as a Context for Teaching/Learning. J Holist Nurs. 2013; 31(1):19-24.

(24) Musso LB, Vargas BA, Torres MB, Canto MJC, Meléndez CG, Balloqui MFK, Cornejo AS. Fatores derivados dos laboratórios intra-hospitalares que provocam estresse nos estudantes de enfermagem. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2008; 16(5):805-11.

(25) Cardoso AF, Moreli L, Braga FT, Vasques CI, Carvalho EC. Effect of a video on developing skills in undergraduate nursing students for the management of totally implantable central venous access ports. Nurs Educ Today. 2012; 32:709-13.

(26) Williams B, French J, Brown T. Can interprofessional education DVD simulations provide an alternative method for clínical placements in nursing? Nurs Educ Today. 2009; 29(6):666–70.

(27) Kinney S, Henderson D. Comparison of Low Fidelity Simulation Learning Strategy With Traditional Lecture. Clin Simul Nurs. 2008; 4(2):15-8.

Published

2014-07-10

How to Cite

de Souza Teixeira, C. R., Kusumota, L., Alves Pereira, M. C., Titareli Merizio Martins Brag, F., Pirani Gaioso, V., Mara Zamarioli, C., & Campos de Carvalho, E. (2014). Anxiety and performance of nursing students in regard to assessment via clinical simulations in the classroom versus filmed assessments. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.19966

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES / ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS

Most read articles by the same author(s)