Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion

Authors

  • Miriam Abreu Almeida RN, Ph.D. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul –UFRGS-, Brasil. email: miriam.abreu2@gmail.com.
  • Marcos Barragan Silva RN, Ph.D candidate. UFRGS, Brasil. email: marcossbarragan@gmail.com.
  • Bruna Paulsen Panato Undergraduate nursing student. UFRGS, Brasil. email: bruna.enfufrgs@gmail.com.
  • Ana Paula Oliveira Siqueira RN, Master candidate. UFRGS, Brasil. email: ana.o.siq@gmail.com.
  • Mariana Palma Silva Undergraduate nursing student. UFRGS, Brasil. email: maripalma88@gmail.com.
  • Bruna Engelman Undergraduate nursing student. UFRGS, Brasil. email: brunaengelman@gmail.com.
  • Isis Marques Severo RN, Ph.D candidate. UFRGS, Brasil. email: isismsevero@gmail.com.
  • Aline Tsuma Gaedke Nomura RN, Master. UFRGS, Brasil. email: alinenomura@hotmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.21900

Keywords:

Outcome assessment (health care), / classification, validation study, critical care, neurology.

Abstract

Objective. Select and validate the clinical indicators to monitor patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion, according to the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).

Methodology. Validation study carried out between November 2012 and August 2013, in a Brazilian hospital. Seventeen judges nurses evaluated the clinical indicators of Nursing Outcomes, according to NOC for patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. In the first stage, were selected the nursing results for the assessment of the studied diagnosis and, in the second nurses assessment the importance of the indicators of the validated results in the previous step through a five points Likert scale (1 = not important to 5 = extremely important). Were used the content validity index (CVI) that corresponds to the calculation of weighted averages of them marks awarded for each indicator, as it considered the following weights: 1=0.00, 2=0.25, 3=0.50; 4=0.75; 5=1.00. For categorization, the CVI considered as critical = ≥0.80; supplementary =≥0.50 to 0.79 and were disposed results <0.50.

Results. Of the 9 nursing results, only the cerebral tissue perfusion obtained a 100% consensus. The CVI of the 18 indicators of this result showed that five were validated as critical (impaired neurological reflexes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, reduced level of consciousness and mean arterial pressure), 12 were validated as supplementary (Agitation, Impaired cognition, Intracranial pressure, Syncope, Vomiting, Findings of cerebral angiography, Headache, Restlessness, Fever, Unexplained anxiety, listlessness and Hiccughs) and one was disposed (carotid bruit).

Conclusions. The validation of information about the conditions of risk may allow early intervention to minimize the consequences of ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion.

 

How to cite this article: Almeida MA, Silva MB, Panato BP, Siqueira APO, Silva MP, Engelman B, et al. Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. Invest Educ Enferm. 2015; 33(1):

|Abstract
= 1181 veces | RESUMEN | RESUMO
= 10 veces| | PDF
= 319 veces| | HTML ENGLISH
= 1 veces| | HTML PORTUGUES
= 6 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Carvalho EC, Cruz DALM, Herdman TH. Contribuição das linguagens padronizadas para a produção do conhecimento, raciocínio clínico e prática clínica da Enfermagem. Rev Bras Enferm. 2013; 66(spe):134-41.

(2) Herdman TH. NANDA International nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification, 2012-2014. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012.

(3) Cabral NL. Epidemiologia e impacto da doença cerebrovascular no Brasil e no Mundo. ComCiência. 2009; 109.

(4) Cavalcante TF, Moreira RP, Guedes NG, Araujo TL, Lopes MVO, Damasceno MMC, Lima FET. Nursing interventions for stroke patients: an integrative literature review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011; 45(6):1495-500.

(5) Seganfredo DH, Almeida MA. Produção de conhecimento sobre resultados de enfermagem. Rev Bras Enferm. 2010; 63(1):122-6.

(6) Moorhead S, Johnson M, Maas ML, Swanson E. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2010.

(7) Lucena AF, Ilesca Holsbach I, Pruinelli L, Cardoso ASF, Mello BS. Brazilian Validation of the Nursing Outcomes for Acute Pain. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2013; 24(1):54-8.

(8) Almeida MA, Seganfredo DH, Unicovsky MR. Nursing outcome indicator validation for patients with orthopedic problems. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010; 44(4):1059-64.

(9) Lopes JL, Barros ALBL, Michel JL. A pilot study to validate the priority nursing interventions classification interventions and nursing outcomes classification outcomes for the nursing diagnosis "excess fluid volume" in cardiac patients Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009; 20(2):76-88.

(10) Beltrão BA, Silva VM, Araujo TL, Lopes MVO. Clinical Indicators of Ineffective Breathing Pattern in Children with Congenital Heart Diseases. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2011; 22(11):4-12.

(11) Almeida MA, Silva MB, Panato BP, Siqueira APO, Laurent MC. Nursing outcomes for Brazilian pediatric patients hospitalized with deficient diversional activity. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2013; 24(2):85-92.

(12) Carlson J. Consensus validation process: A standardized research method to identify and link the relevant NANDA, NIC and NOC terms for local populations. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006; 17(1):23-4.

(13) Fehring R. Methods to validate nursing diagnosis. Heart Lung. 1987; 16(6):625-9.

(14) North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA: definições e classificação (2007-2008). Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2008.

(15) Melo RP, Moreira RP, Fontenele FC, Aguiar ASC, Joventino ES, Carvalho EC. Critérios de seleção de experts para estudos de validação de fenômenos de enfermagem. Rev Rene. 2011; 12(2):424–31.

(16) Lee E, Park H, Whyte J, Kim Y, Park SY. Identifying core nursing sensitive outcomes associated with the most frequently used North American Nursing Diagnosis Association—International nursing diagnoses for patients with cerebrovascular disease in Korea. Int J Nurs Pract. 2013; [Epub ahead of print].

(17) Alcântara TFDL, Marques IR. Avanços na monitorização neurológica intensiva: implicações para a enfermagem. Rev Bras Enferm. 2009; 62(6):894-900.

(18) Ministério da Saúde (BR). Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas – trombólise no acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico agudo, 2012. Portaria 664, (April 12, 2012).

(19) Brandão AA, Magalhães MEC, Ávila A, Tavares A, Machado CA, Campana EMG et al. Conceituação, epidemiologia e prevenção primária. J Bras Nefrol. 2010; 32(Suppl1):1-4.

(20) Brains Trauma Fundation. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brains injuty. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24 (Suppl 1):1-106.

(21) Truppel TC, Meier MJ, Calixto RC, Peruzzo SA, Crozeta K. Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Rev Bras Enf. 2009; 62(2):221-7.

(22) Souza CC, Chianca LM, Diniz AS, Chianca TCM. Principais queixas de pacientes de urgência segundo o protocolo de classificação de risco de Manchester. Rev enferm UFPE on line. 2012; 6(3):540-8.

(23) Middleton S, McElduff P, Ward J, Grimshaw JM, BAHons SD, D'Este C. et al. Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycemia and swallowing dysfunction in acute storke (ASC): A cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2011; 378(9804):1699–706.

(24) Gonzalez MM, Timerman S, Oliveira RG, Polastri TF, Dallan LA, Palma AS et al. I guideline for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care - Brazilian Society of Cardiology: executive summary. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013; 100(2):105-13.

(25) American Association of Neuroscience Nurses –AANN-. Care of the Patient with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. AANN Clinical Practice Guideline Series [Internet]. Chicago, IL:AANN; 2011 [cited 2014 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.aann.org/pdf/cpg/aannaneurysmalsah.pdf

Published

2015-02-16

How to Cite

Abreu Almeida, M., Silva, M. B., Panato, B. P., Oliveira Siqueira, A. P., Silva, M. P., Engelman, B., Severo, I. M., & Nomura, A. T. G. (2015). Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.21900

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES / ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS