Effect of the Implementation of Interdisciplinary Discharge Planning on Treatment Adherence and Readmission in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Angioplasty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e08Keywords:
interprofessional relations, patient discharge, patient readmission, patient compliance, angioplastyAbstract
Objective. To determine the effect of interdisciplinary discharge planning on treatment adherence and readmission in the patients undergoing coronary artery angioplasty in the south of Iran in 2020.
Methods. This experimental study had an intervention group and a control group with pre-test and post-test. 70 patients participated in the study who were randomly divided into the groups (intervention group (n=35) and control group (n=35)). In the intervention group, discharge planning was performed based on an interdisciplinary approach. Treatment adherence before, immediately, and one month after the intervention was evaluated with a 10-question survey scored from 1 to 5 (maximum score = 50), as well as readmission three months after the discharge was examined in both groups.
Results. Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and the control groups in the treatment adherence score (18.22 versus 17.37; p=0.84) but immediately and one month after the intervention statistically significant differences between the groups were showed (21.51 versus 46.14 and 23.28 versus 43.12, respectively; p<0.001). Within three months after discharge, the readmission rate was 11.4% in the control group, while no readmission was reported in the intervention group. Within three months after discharge, the readmission rate was 11.4% in the control group, while no readmission was reported in the intervention group.
Conclusion. The implementation of interdisciplinary discharge planning had positive effects on treatment adherence and readmission rate in patients undergoing coronary artery angioplasty; therefore, it is suggested that health care system managers make the necessary plans to institutionalize this new educational approach for other patients discharge planning.
Downloads
References
1. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale GP, Torbica A, Lettino M, Petersen SE.et al. European Society of Cardiology: CardiovascularDisease Statistics 2019. Eur. Heart J. 2020; 14:12-85.
2. Jensen MT, Marott JL, Holtermann A, Gyntelberg F. Living alone is associatedwith all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: 32 years of follow-up in the Copenhagen Male Study. Eur. Heart. J. Qual. Care Clin. Outcomes. 2019; 5:208-17.
3. Shah R, Wilkins E, Nichols M, Kelly P, El-Sadi F, Wright FL, et al. Epidemiology report: trends in sex-specific cerebrovascular disease mortality in Europe based on WHO mortality data. Eur. Heart J. 2019; 40:755764.
4. Sarrafzadegan N, Mohammmadifard N. Cardiovascular Disease in Iran in the Last 40 Years: Prevalence, Mortality, Morbidity, Challenges and Strategies for Cardiovascular Prevention. Arch. Iran. Med. 2019; 22(4):204-10.
5. Mukherjee D. Coronary Revascularization in the United States—Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in 2020. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020; 3(2): e1921322.
6. Baumbach A, Bourantas CV, Serruys PW Wijns W. The year in cardiology: coronary interventions: The year in cardiology 2019. Eur. Heart J. 2020; 41(3):394–405.
7. Mohammadi, F., Jahromi, M.S., Bijani, M. Karimi, S, Dehghan. A. Investigating the effect of multimedia education in combination with teach-back method on quality of life and cardiac anxiety in patients with heart failure: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.2021;21(535):1-9
8. Homson P, Rushworth GF, Andreis F, Angus JA, Mohan AR, Leslies SJ. Longitudinal study of the relationship between patients’ medication adherence and quality of life outcomes and illness perceptions and beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.2020; 20:71.
9. Ahmed R, Aslani P. What is patient adherence? A terminology overview. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2014;36(1):4-7.
10. Laan VD, Danielle M, Petra E, et al. Factors Associated With Non adherence to Cardiovascular Medications. Across-sectional Study. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2019; 34(4):344-52.
11. Rashidi A, Kaistha P, Whitehead L, Robinson S. Factors that influence adherence to treatment plans amongst people living with cardiovascular disease: A review of published qualitative research studies. Int. Nurs. Stud. 2020; 110: 103727.
12. Vaismoradi M, Tella S, Logan PA. et al. Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17(6):1-15.
13. Flinkg M, Ekstedt M. Planning for the Discharge, not for Patient Self-Management at Home – An Observational and Interview Study of Hospital Discharge. Int. J. Integr. Care. 2017;17(6):1.
14. Lin CJ, Cheng SJ, Shih SC, Chu CH, Tjung JJ. Discharge planning. Int. J. Gerontol. 2012; 6(4):237-40.
15. Marcus-Aiyeku UR. Interdisciplinary teams: Where the magic happens. Nursing Management. 2017 Jun 1;48(6):15-7.
16. Gabriel S. Use of a Daily Discharge Goals Checklist for Timely Discharge and Patient Satisfaction. MedSurg Nurs. 2017; 26(4).
17. PEEK, Lori; GUIKEMA, Seth. Interdisciplinary theory, methods, and approaches for hazards and disaster research: An introduction to the special issue. Risk Analysis, 2021, 41.7: 1047-1058.
18. Negarandeh R, Nayeri ND, Shirani F, Janani L. The impact of discharge plan upon re-admission, satisfaction with nursing care and the ability to self-care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Eur. J. Cardiov. Nurs. 2012; 11(4):460-5.
19. Newman I, Lim J, Pineda F. Content validity using a mixed methods approach: Its application and development through the use of a table of specifications methodology. J. Mixed Methods Res. 2013; 7(3):243–60.
20. Bijani M, Rakhshan M., Fararouei, M. Torabizadeh C. Development and psychometric assessment of the triage nurses’ professional capability questionnaire in the emergency department. BMC Nurs.2020; 19:82.
21. Kinugasa Y, Kato M, Sugihara S, Yanagihara K, Yamada K, Hirai M, Yamamoto K. Multidisciplinary intensive education in the hospital improves outcomes for hospitalized heart failure patients in a Japanese rural setting. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014; 14:351.
22. Probst S, Allet L, Depeyre J, Colin S, Skinner MB. A targeted interprofessional educational intervention to address therapeutic adherence of venous leg ulcer persons (TIEIVLU): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1):243.
23. Rezapoor P, Shahriari M, Sanei M. Moeni M. Effects of Collaboration Care Model on the Quality of Life in Patients after Coronary Angioplasty: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int. J. Community Based Nurs. Midwifery. 2017 ;5(2):112-22.
24. Cox M, Cuff P, Brandt B, Reeves S, Zierler B. Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. J. Interprof. Care. 2016; 30(1):1-3.
25. Clarkson JN, Schaffer SD, Clarkson JJ. The Effect of an Interprofessional Heart Failure Education Program on Hospital Readmissions. J. Healthc. Qual.2017;39(2):78-84.
26. Ching D, Forte D, Aitchison E, Earle K. Are there long-term benefits of experiential, interprofessional education for non-specialists on clinical behaviours and outcomes in diabetes care? A cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:e009083.
27. Kong CW, Wilkinson MA. Predicting and preventing hospital readmission for exacerbations of COPD. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(2): 00325-2019.
28. Pallangyo P, Millinga J, Bhalia S, Mkojera Z, Misidai N, Swai HJ, et al. Medication adherence and survival among hospitalized heart failure patients in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. BMC Res. Notes. 2020; 13(1):89.
29. Andrésa E, Corderob A, Magán P. Long-Term Mortality and Hospital Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction, an Eight-Year Follow-Up Study. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2012; 65(5):414-20.
30. Miles LM, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Gulliford M, Locock L, McCambridge J, et al. Bias due to Measurement Reactions in Trials to improve health (MERIT): protocol for research to develop MRC guidance. Trials. 2018; 19(1):653.
31. Woo BF, Lee JX, San Tam WW. The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Hum. Resources Health. 2017; 15(1):63.
Published
Versions
- 2023-09-20 (3)
- 2022-07-14 (2)
- 2022-06-27 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
