Labor participation of married women and their spouses in Colombia: A related-decision based approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n74a9999Keywords:
married woman, labor participation, biprobit, ColombiaAbstract
This paper analyzes the determinants of labor participation of married women (married or in consensual union) and their spouses as a family decision in Colombia. It has been found that married women experience a greater pressure for participating in the labor market than women in general. Education is an important factor that reduces the gap in labor participation rates among couples. The econometric estimations, using a bivariate probit model corrected for selection bias, show that the labor participation decision of couples is affected in different ways by human capital endowment, school age children, household economic conditions, and indicators of labor demand and regional characteristics.
Downloads
References
Arango, Luis Eduardo y Posada, Carlos (2003). “La participación laboral en Colombia”, Borradores de Economía, No. 217, pp. 1-26.
Arango, Luis Eduardo and Posada, Carlos (2007). “Labor Participation of Married Women in Colombia”, Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, No. 60, pp. 93-126.
Ashenfelter, Orley and Heckman, James (1974). “The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effects in a Model of Family Labor Supply”, Econometrica, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 3-85.
Becker, Gary (1987). Tratado sobre la familia. Madrid, Alianza.
Blundell, Richard; Ham, John and Meghir, Costas (1998). “Unemployment, Discouraged Workers and Female Labour Supply”, Research in Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 103-131.
Blundell, Richard and Walker, Ian (1982). “Modelling the Joint Determination of Household Labour Supply and Commodity Demands”, Economic Journal, Vol. 92, No. 366, pp. 351-364.
Blundell, Richard and Walker, Ian (1986). “A Life-Cycle Consitent Empirical Model of Family Labour Supply Ussing Cross-Section Data”, The Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 539-558.
Browning, Martin y Meghir, Costas (1991). “The Effects of Male and Female Labor Supply on Commodity Demands”, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 925-951.
Cameron, Colin and Trivedi, Pravin (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Charry, Alejandro (2003). “La participación laboral de las mujeres no jefes de hogar en Colombia y el efecto del servicio doméstico”, Borradores de Economía, No. 262, pp. 1-41.
Cruz Aparicio, Jenny Lorena (2008). Desarrollo económico y participación laboral de las mujeres casadas-unidas en Colombia (2006), Tesis para optar el título de Economista, Departamento de Economía, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Dane. Encuesta Continua de Hogares 2006.
Greene, William (2003). Econometric Análisis, New Jersey, Ed. Prentice Hall.
Hausman, Jerry and Ruud, Paul (1984). “Family Labour Supply with Taxes”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 242-248.
Heckman, James (1974). “Effects of Child-Care Programs on Women’s Work Effort”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp.136-163. Reprinted in T.W. Schultz (ed.), Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital, [online] http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2976.pdf.
López, Hugo (1995). “Participación laboral y desempleo en las cuatro principales ciudades: un modelo econométrico”. En: López, Hugo (1996), Ensayos sobre Economía Laboral Colombiana, FONADE y Carlos Valencia Editores. pp. 36-44.
López, Hugo (2001). “Características y determinantes de la oferta laboral colombiana y su relación con la dinámica del desempleo”, Seminario sobre aspectos teóricos y experiencias internacionales en materia de empleo y desempleo, Banco de la República, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lundberg, Shelly (1988). “Labor Supply of Husbands and Wives: A Simultaneous Equations Approach”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 224-235.
Martínez-Granado, Maite (2001). “Oferta de trabajo femenina en España: un modelo empírico aplicado a mujeres casadas”, Cuadernos Económicos de I.C.E., No. 66, pp. 129-152.
Mincer, Jacob (1962). “Labor-Force Participation of Married Women: A Study Labor Supply”. In: H. Gregg Lewis (ed.), Aspects of Labor Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3-35
Mora, John James (2008). “La relación entre la participación laboral y las remesas en Colombia”, Borradores de Economía y Finanzas, No. 17. pp. 1-23
Ribero, Rocío y García, Carmen (1996). “Estadísticas descriptivas del mercado laboral masculino y femenino en Colombia: 1976-1995”, Archivos de Macroeconomía, No. 48, DNP, Colombia, pp. 1-38.
Ribero, Rocío y Meza, Claudia (1997). “Determinantes de la participación laboral de los hombres y mujeres en Colombia: 1976-1995”, Archivos de Macroeconomía No. 63, DNP, Colombia, pp. 1-30.
Roodman, David (2009). “Estimating Fully Observed Recursive MixedProcess Models with CMP”, Working Paper, No. 168, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.
Santamaría, Mauricio y Rojas, Norberto (2001). “La participación laboral: ¿Qué ha pasado y qué podemos esperar?”, Archivos de Macroeconomía, No. 146, DNP, Bogotá, Colombia, pp. 1-23.
Segura, Marta (2002). “Comportamiento (condicionado) de las parejas casadas en materia laboral: una evidencia para el caso español”, Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, No. 66, pp. 153-181.
Tenjo, Jaime y Ribero, Rocío (1998). “Participación, desempleo y mercados laborales en Colombia”, Archivos de Macroeconomía, No. 81, DNP, Bogotá, Colombia, pp. 1-52.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Ccross-Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
Velez, Eduardo and Winter, Carolin (1992). “Women’s Labor Force Participation and Earnings in Colombia”, In: Psacharopolous, George and Tzannatos, Zafiris (Eds), Women Employment and Payin Latin America, Report 10 (Vol. II), Washington, D.C., World Bank.
Zellner, Arnold and Huang, David (1962). “Further Properties of Efficient Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations”, International Economic Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 300-313.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This page, by Universidad de Antioquia, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License allowing others to share it as long as they acknowledge its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided that these arrangements be not for profit and the journal be acknowledged as the original source of publication.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their papers online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites), as it can lead to valuable exchanges as well as greater citation of the published work.