REASSEMBLING WRITING SYSTEMS: MATERIALITY(IES), CONCRETE THINKING, AND LOGIC OF THE ABSTRACT

Authors

  • Rodrigo Cabrera Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Liliana Manzi Universidad de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n86a04

Keywords:

ancient writing systems, concrete thinking, logic of the abstract, metaphor, mimesis

Abstract

This article proposes an interdisciplinary approach to the notion of the linguistic sign. It starts from the semiotic debates on the dichotomous versus the trichotomous approach to it. In this respect, the premise of materiality ―i. e. the subject/object dialectic― outlined by Material Culture Studies is considered. Furthermore, the notions of concrete thinking and the logic of the abstract are discussed in connection with the ideas of metaphor and mimesis. The above proposal will be based on the analysis of epigraphic evidence corresponding to the writing systems used by the ancient societies of Egypt and Mesopotamia.

|Abstract
= 160 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 99 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, J. P. (2010 [2000]). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press.

Assmann, J. (2001). Tod und Jenseits im alten Ägypten. C.H. Beck.

Borger, R. (2004). Mesopotamisches Zeichenlexikon. Ugarit-Verlag.

Borrero, L. (1993). Artefactos y evolución. Palimpsesto, 3, 15-32.

Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique (précédé de Trois études d’ethnologie kabyle). Droz.

Cabrera, R. (2017). La inter-textualidad y la inter-materialidad de los objetos. La «ofrenda funeraria» en la tensión entre cultura material y evidencia epigráfica entre el Dinástico Temprano iiib y la época neo-sumeria (Baja Mesopotamia, c. 2600-2100 a.C.). Sociedades Precapitalistas, 7(1), e020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/22505121e020

Cabrera, R. (2019). Entre cuñas, tablillas y escribas: la materialidad de los paisajes funerarios en Mesopotamia durante la Tercera Dinastía de Ur. Revista del Museo de Antropología, 12(2), 7-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v12.n2.23526

Cammarosano, M. (2014). The Cuneiform Stylus. Mesopotamia, 49, 53-85.

Edzard, D. O. (1976-1980). Keilschrift. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie, 5, 544-568.

Gardiner, A. (1957 [1927]). Egyptian Grammar: Being an Introduction to the Study of Hieroglyphs. Griffith Institute.

Gell, A. (1997). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press.

Goldwasser, O. (1995). From Icon to Metaphor. Studies in the Semiotics of the Hieroglyphs. University Press Fribourg/Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Hannig, R. (2003). Ägyptisches Wörterbuch I: Altes Reich und Erste Zwischenzeit. Verlag Phillip von Zabern.

Hodder, I. (ed.) (1982). Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. (1987). The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings. Cambridge University Press.

Hodder, I. (2011). Human-Thing Entanglement: towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 17, 154-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x

Jochim, M. (1983). Palaeolithic Cave Art in Ecological Perspective. En G. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory. A European Perspective (pp. 212-219). Cambridge University Press.

Labat, R., & Malbran-Labat, F. (1995 [1948]). Manuel d’épigraphie akkadienne. Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Plon.

Manzi, L. (2016). Monumentalización y evocación en el paisaje de Tebas occidental, Egipto. Revista Mundo Antigo, 5(9), 191-205. http://www.nehmaat.uff.br/revista/2016-A/artigo10-2016-A.pdf

Michalowski, P. (1992). Orality, Literacy and Early Mesopotamian Literature. En M. E. Vogelzang & H. L. J. Vanstiphout (Eds.), Mesopotamian Epic Literature: Oral or Aural? (pp. 227-245). Edwin Meller.

Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. An Introduction. En D. Miller (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1-50). Duke University Press.

Mithen, S. (1996a). The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art and Science. Thames and Hudson Ltd.

Mithen, S. (1996b). The Origin of Art. Natural Signs, Mental Modularity, and Visual Symbolism. En H. Maschner (Ed.), Darwinian Archaeologies (pp. 197-217). Plenum Press.

Mittermayer, C. (2006). Altbabylonische Zeichenliste der sumerisch-literarischen Texte. Academic Press/Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.

Olsen, B. (2003). Material Culture After Text: Re-Membering Things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36 (2), 87-104.

Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Routledge.

Peirce, C. S. (1931-1935). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2, eds. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss. Harvard University Press.

Preucel, R. W. (2006). Archaeological Semiotics. Blackwell.

Ricoeur, P. (1975). La métaphore vive. Le Seuil.

Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.

Tilley, C. (1999). Metaphor and Material Culture. Blackwell.

Veldhuis, N. (2002). Studies in Sumerian Vocabulary: dnin-ka6; immal/šilam; and še21.d. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 54, 67-77.

Veldhuis, N. (2011). Levels of Literacy. En K. Radner & E. Robson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture (pp. 68-89). Oxford University Press.

Wobst H. M. (1999). Style in Archaeology or Archaeology in Style. En E. S. Chilton (Ed.), Material Meanings. Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture (pp. 118-132). The University of Utah Press.

Zólyomi, G. (2017). An Introduction to the Grammar of Sumerian. Eötvös Kiadó.

Zólyomi, G. (2024). Mesopotamian Bilingual Royal Inscriptions from the Third Millennium BCE: Texts with a Primary and Secondary Context. En S. Sövegjártó & M. Vér (Eds.), Exploring Multilingualism and Multiscriptism in Written Artefacts (pp. 309-330). De Gruyter.

Published

2024-07-17

How to Cite

Cabrera, R., & Manzi, L. (2024). REASSEMBLING WRITING SYSTEMS: MATERIALITY(IES), CONCRETE THINKING, AND LOGIC OF THE ABSTRACT. Lingüística Y Literatura, 45(86), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n86a04