“COMPLEX NORMATIVITY” AS A POSSIBLE ANSWER TO THE DEBATES ABOUT LITERARY CANON

Authors

  • Mario Alejandro Molano Vega University of Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.6300

Keywords:

Literary studies, Literary criticism, Literary canon, Literature of the XX century

Abstract

This paper analyzes some difficulties that had risen after the discussions on canon, specifically about the normative and evaluative functions of the criticism. From that point I will try to argue that a possible answer could be developed with the “complex normativity” concept –which Lambert Zuidervaart refers at the end of his investigation on Adorno’s aesthetic theory. In that purpose, I will reconstruct the Zuidervaart proposal context and some of its main elements.

|Abstract
= 82 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 49 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adorno, T. W., 2003, Notas sobre literatura, Madrid: Akal.

____________., 2004, Teoría Estética. Obra completa, (Vol. 7), Madrid: Akal.

Bürger, P., 1996, Crítica de la estética idealista, Madrid: Visor.

____________., 1985-1986, Te institution of “Art” as a Category in the Sociology of Literature. Cultural Critique, pp. 5-33.

____________., 1987, Teoría de la vanguardia, Barcelona: Península.

González-Stephan, B., 2002, Fundaciones: canon, historia y cultura nacional. La historiografía literaria del liberalismo hispanoamericano del siglo XIX, Madrid: Iberoamericana.

Habermas, J., 1987, Teoría de la acción comunicativa, Madrid: Taurus.

Lotman, I., 1996, La Semiosfra. I. Semiótica de la cultura y del texto, Madrid: Cátedra.

Mignolo, W., 1991, Canons a(nd) cross-cultural boundaries (or, whose cann are we talking about?),Poetics Today , pp. 1-28.

Mukarovsky, J., 2000, Signo, función y valor, Bogotá: Universidad Nacional.

Zuidervaart, L., 1991, Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion.Massachusets: MIT Press.

Published

2010-07-27

How to Cite

Molano Vega, M. A. (2010). “COMPLEX NORMATIVITY” AS A POSSIBLE ANSWER TO THE DEBATES ABOUT LITERARY CANON. Lingüística Y Literatura, (57), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.6300

Issue

Section

Research articles