Milk quality of dual-purpose cows supplemented with biological fish silage (Pterygoplichthys sp.) as a protein source
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v33n4a05Keywords:
cow milk, devil fish, dual purpose cows, feed supplement, fish silage, milk quality, protein source, protein supplementAbstract
Background: Devilfish (Pterygoplichthys sp.) is a pest of high impact in aquaculture production systems. Through a biological fermentation process, it could be used as a source of protein for dairy cows. However, milk palatability and smell could be limiting factors. Objective: to evaluate the quality of milk from cows supplemented with biological fish silage (Pterygoplichthys sp.) as a protein source. Methods: The treatments (T) evaluated were T1, 0% biological fish silage; T2, 10% biological fish silage; and T3, 20% biological fish silage. Twelve randomly selected cows were used in a Latin square experimental design, in which three treatments were tested with all of the cows during three time periods. Each period lasted 20 days (15-day adaptation period and 5-day experimental phase). Milk was analyzed for physicochemical, microbiological, sanitary condition and sensory characteristics. Analyses of variance were performed for all the response variables. Results: No significant differences for physicochemical variables were found among the treatments studied. Differences were observed in microbiological and sanitary variables among treatments, but values were in the range for high quality milk standards (˂100,000 CFU mL-1 aerobic mesophilic bacteria, and ˂400,000 somatic cells mL-1). In the sensory analyses, panelists did not detect strange odors nor fishy taste or odor in the milk of any of the treatments. Conclusion: Biological fish silage can be included up to 20% as a protein source in supplements for lactating cows.
Downloads
References
Araújo RGM, Assis D, Lemes SR, Melo-Reis PR, AAvramis C, Wang H, McBride B, Wright T, Hill A. Physical and processing properties of milk, butter, and Cheddar cheese from cows fed supplemental fish meal. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86(8): 2568-2576. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73851-X
Bragaglio A, Braghieri A, Napolitano F, De-Rosa G, Riviezzi AM, Surianello F, Pacelli C. Omega-3 supplementation, milk quality and cow immune-competence. Ital J Agron 2015; 10(1):9-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2015.611
Chilliard Y, Ferlay A, Doreau M. Effect of different types of forages, animal fat or marine oils in cow’s diet on milk fat secretion and composition, especially conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Livest Prod Sci 2001; 70(1):31-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00196-8
Citalán CL, Ramos JJ, Salinas HR, Bucio GA, Osorio AM, Herrera HJ, Orantes ZM. Análisis sensorial de leche de vacas suplementadas con un alimento fermentado a base de pollinaza. ERA 2016; 3(8):181-191. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.19136/era.a3n8.817
Fatahnia F, Nikkhah A, Zamiri M, Kahrizi D. Effect of dietary fish oil and soybean oil on milk production and composition of Holstein cows in early lactation. Asian Austral J Anim 2008; 21(3):386.
Garduza AG, Garcia BC, Mendoza GD, Sánchez TM, Suárez ME, Guzmán A. Effect of supplementation with rumen undegradable protein on milk production and ovarian activity in double purpose cows, J Appl Anim Res 2013; 41(2):223-228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.739088
Keady TW, Mayne CS, Fitzpatrick DA. Effects of supplementation of dairy cattle with fish oil on silage intake, milk yield and milk composition. J Dairy Res 2000; 67(2):137-153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029900004180
Latimer-Jr, GW.Official methods of analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 20th edition, Appendix D, Guidelines for collaborative study procedures to validate characteristics of a method of analysis 2016. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Naranjo JF, Cuartas CA. Caracterización nutricional y de la cinética de degradación ruminal de algunos de los recursos forrajeros con potencial para la suplementación de rumiantes en el trópico alto de Colombia. Revista CES MVZ 2011; 6(1): 9-19.
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-155-SCFI-2012. Leche – Denominaciones, especificaciones fisicoquímicas, información comercial y métodos de prueba. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=690308&fecha=12/09/2012. (Accessed May 20, 2018).
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-243-SSA1-2010. Productos y servicios. Leche, fórmula láctea, producto lácteo combinado y derivados lácteos. Disposiciones y especificaciones sanitarias. Métodos de prueba. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5160755&fecha=27/09/2010. (Accessed May 20, 2019)
NMX-F-700-COFOCALEC-2012. Sistema producto leche-alimento lácteo-leche cruda de vaca-especificaciones fisicoquímicas, sanitarias y métodos de prueba. http://www.canilec.org.mx/Circulares%202012/93del12/PROY-NMX-F-700COFOCALEC2012%20110212.pdf. (Accessed May 31, 2018).
Park WY, Albenzio M, Sevi A. Milk quality standards and controls. In: Park WY, Haenlein FWJ, editors. Milk and dairy products in human nutrition: production, composition and health. 1st ed. Iowa: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2013. p.261-283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118534168.ch13
Pérez JT, Iglesias JL. Estudio comparativo de los residuos de pescado ensilados por vías bioquímica y biológica. Revista AquaTIC 2016; (25):28-33.Pérez R. Fish silage for feeding livestock. World Animal Review 1995; (82): 34-42. En D. Chupin (ed). Better feed for animals: more food for people (Con mejores piensos, más alimentos para la población) 1995/1. http://www.fao.org/AG/aga/agap/FRG/FEEDback/War/v4440b/v4440b0d.htm (Accessed May 10, 2018).
Roessler EB, Pangborn RM, Sidel JL, Stone H. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired preference, paired-difference, duo-trio and triangle test. J Food Sci 1978; 43(3): 940-943. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02458.x
SAS, 2017 Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide. 7th Edition. SAS® Documentation. SAS Institute Inc. https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/proc/70377/PDF/default/proc.pdf (Accesed Julio 3, 2017).
Shingfield KJ, Ahvenjärvi S, Toivonen V, Ärölä A, Nurmela K, Huhtanen P, Griinari J. Effect of dietary fish oil on biohydrogenation of fatty acids and milk fatty acid content in cows. Animal Science 2003; 77(1): 165-179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800053765
Spain JN, Polan CE, Watkins BA. Evaluating effects of fish meal on milk fat yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1995; 78(5): 1142-1153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76731-5
Wright TC, Holub BJ, Hill AR, McBride BW. Effect of combinations of fish meal and feather meal on milk fatty acid content and nitrogen utilization in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86(3):861-869. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73669-8
Wolter W, Castañeda H, Kloppert B, Zschöck M. La mastitis bovina. Universidad de Guadalajara 2004.http://infolactea.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/608.pdf. (Accessed May 3, 2018).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors enable RCCP to reprint the material published in it.
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions, and will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.