Historiografía de la aplicación de las teorías administrativas estadounidenses: fordismo y taylorismo en Argentina y Brasil en el siglo XX

Federico Alonso Atehortúa Hurtado

doi:10.17533/udea.trahs.16568

Authors

Federico Alonso Atehortúa Hurtado University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.trahs.16568

Keywords:

Fordism, Taylorism, Argentina, Brazil

Abstract

There was a balance on historiographic research on implementation in Argentina and Brazil of Taylorism and Fordism in the twentieth century and its influence on industry and other areas of society. Starts with a conceptualization of Taylorism and Fordism. It then presents the historiographical balance about treatment of these issues in Argentina and Brazil. It is concluded that in the studies analyzed is a central discussion each extension of Taylorism and Fordism was due to the impulse that gave employers or state initiative.

|Abstract

= 199 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))

= 291 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Federico Alonso Atehortúa Hurtado, University of Antioquia

Master in Environment and Development from the National University of Colombia, with ongoing studies in History at the University of Antioquia. He is the training and research coordinator of Gestión y Conocimiento S.A.S. His lines of research are knowledge management and the environment.

References

Aguirre, Carlos Antonio. “Los procesos de trabajo taylorista y fordista: notas sobre la hiperracionalización del trabajo y la caída de la tasa de ganancia”. Revista Mundo Siglo XXI 11 (2011): 22-43.

Aquino, Cristian y otros. “Taylorismo, fordismo y post-fordismo en la Argentina: ¿la consolidación del régimen de gran industria?”. Razón y Revolución 4 (1998): 1-11.

Barbero, María Inés. “Business History in Latin America: A Historiographical Perspective”. Business History Review 82 (2008): 555-575.

Cohn, Gabriel. “La industrialización en Brasil: proceso y perspectivas”. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 33.3 (1971): 489.

Fernández, Abel. “Mauro F. Guillén, Wharton School of Management.” (2010) http://www.sintetia.com/mauro-f-guillen-wharton-school-of-management/ (03/07/2012)).

Grandin, Greg. Fordlandia. New York: Ediciones Picador, 2009.

Guillén, Mauro. “Modernism without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940”. Latin American Research Review 39.2 (2004): 6-34.

Holston, James. The Modernist City: An Antropological Critique of Brasilia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.

Hora, Roy. “The Landowners of the Argentine Pampas: A Social and Political History, 1860-1945”. Journal of Social History 37.4 (2004): 1102-1104.

Kabat, Marina. “La industria del calzado: cambios en la organización del trabajo entre 1880 y 1940”. Desarrollo económico 47.188 (2008): 639-659.

Lobato, Mirta y Juan Suriano. Nueva Historia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2010.

Martínez de Ita, María Eugenia. La situación de los trabajadores en la sociedad flexible. http://www.ucm.es/info/ec/jec10/ponencias/608martinezdeita.pdf (28/06/2012).

Melo, Alessandra, Denise Franca y Paulo Matos. “Perspectiva histórica em administração: novos objetos, novos problemas, novas abordagens”. ERA: Revista de Administração de Empresas 50.3 (2010): 288-299.

Mello, Leonardo. “Ontem e hoje: capítulos de história e de sociologia do trabalho”. Revista Esboços 14 (2004): 53-73.

Nozaki, William. “Fordismo e Pós-Fordismo no Brasil” (2006) www.escolanet.com.br (03/07/2012).

Prebisch, Alberto. “Instituto de Organização Racional do Trabalho de São Paulo”. Revista de Organização Cientifica 1 (1932): 35-38.

Real Academia Española. Diccionario de la Real Academia Española http://lema.rae.es/drae/ (03/07/2012).

Taylor, Frederick. Administración científica. Barcelona: Ediciones Orbis S.A., 1947.

Weinstein, Barbara. “The Industrialists, the State, and the Issues of Worker Training and Social Services in Brazil”. The Hispanic American Historical Review 70.3 (1990): 379-404.