Quality in higher education and organizational learning
Abstract
From a review of the quality and its implementation methodologies in productive enterprises being discussed about the effects that the “import” –from the productive sector and from United States and Europe– of the search of quality to higher education – expressed as self-assessment/accreditation– it has on universities that undertake this process, and if this is changed to that effect or are only indicators to meet, obtain accreditation and attract more "customers".
Downloads
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. USA: Addison-Wesley.
Balbastre Benavent , F., & Moreno-Luzon , C. R. (2005). A model of quality management self- assessment: an exploratory research. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(5), 432-451.
Balbastre Benavent, F. (2001). La autoevaluación según los sistemas de gestión de calidad total y el aprendizaje en la organización: una investigación de carácter exploratorio (Tesis Doctoral). Valencia, España: Universidad de Valencia. Documento
Balbastre, F., & Moreno-Luzón, M. (2003). Self-assessment application and learning in organizations: A special reference to the ontological dimension. Total Quality Management & Bussiness Excellence, 14(3), 367-388.
Brewer, P., & Brewer, K. (2010). Knowledge Management, Human Resource Management, and Higher Education: A Theoretical Model . Journal of Education for Bussiness, 85(6), 330- 335.
Conti, T. (1997). Optimizing self-assessment. Total Quality Management, 8(2-3), 5-15.
Crossan M, M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
Chin-Yen, L., & Tsung-Hsien, K. (2007). The mediate effect of learning and knowledge on organizational performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(7), 1066-1083.
Delery, J., & Doty, D. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
Douglas, J., & Douglas, A. (2006). Evaluating teaching quality. Quality in Higher Education, 12(1), 3-13.
EFQM Fundación Europea para la Gestión de la Calidad (2012). Modelo EFQM de calidad y excelencia. Documento
Espinoza, O., & González, L. (2013). Accreditation in higher education in Chile: results and consequences. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 20-38.
Espinoza, O., González, L. E., Prieto, J. P., Fecci, E., Marianov, V., Mora, A., et al. (2006). Informe: Educación Superior en Iberoamérica. El Caso de Chile. Chile: CINDA-Universia.
González, L. (2005). El impacto del proceso de evaluación y acreditación en las universidades de América Latina. Chile: CINDA – IESALC/UNESCO. Documento
Guevara-Agüero, M., Balbastre Benavent, F., & Canet-Giner, M. (s.f.). Self-assessment of higher education degrees and organisational learning: an exploratory study. International Journal for Quality and Standards, 1-36. Documento
Hämäläinen, K., Mustonen , K., & Holm, K. (2004). Standards, criteria, and indicators in programme accreditation and evaluation in western europe. In UNESCO-CEPES, Studies on higher education: indicators for institutional and programme accreditation in higher/tertiary education (Pp.17-32). Bucharest: UNESCO. Documento
Harvey, L., &. Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-36. IIE Institute Industrial Engineers (Hong Kong ) (1994). Annual Journal of
IIE Hong Kong . En Y. D. Linn Richard, Annual Journal of IIE Hong Kong (pág. 45). Hong Kong: BDG Communications Management Limited.
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(1),37-50. Documento
Kollenburg, S. E. (1999). A collection of papers on self-study and institutional improvement. Chicago: North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. Documento
MacMillan, W., & Parker, M. (2005). Quality is bound up with our values: evaluating the quality of mentoring programmes. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 150-160. Documento
McArthur, J. (2011). Reconsidering the social and economic purposes of higher education. Higher Education Research & Developmen, 30(6), 737-749.
Mehralizadeh, Y., & Safaeemoghaddam, M. (2010). The applicability of quality management systems and models to higher education. The TQM Journal, 22(2), 175-187.
MEN Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2013). Estado del arte del sistema nacional de acreditación e identificación de rutas y tópicos de investigación y profundización para el mejoramiento de las condiciones de calidad. Bogotá: SECAB Publicaciones. Documento
Mizikaci, F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 1(14), 36. Documento
Moreno, J. (2007). Guía para la aplicación del modelo EFQM de Excelencia en entidadaes de acción social. España: Fundación Luis Vives. Documento
Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1179-1208.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37. Documento
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. How japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. USA: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: a United Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5-34. Documento
Pratasavitskaya, H., & Stensaker, B. (2010). Quality management in higher education: towards a better understanding of an emerging field. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 37-50.
Ruben, B. (2007). Excellence in higher education guide: an integrated approach to assessment, planning, and improvement in colleges and universities. Washington, D.C.: NACUBO.
Ruben, B., Russ, T., Smulowitz, S., & Connaughton, S. (2007). Evaluating the impact of organizational self-assessment in higher education: The Malcolm Baldrige/Excellence in Higher Education framework. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(3), 230- 250. Documento
Sangeeta, S., & Banwets, K. (2004). Conceptualizing total quality management in higher education. The TQM Magazine, 16(2), 145-159.
Schuler, R., & Jackson, S. (1987). Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practice. The Academy of Management Executive, 1(3), 207-210. Documento
Silva, J., Bernal, E., & Hernández, C. (2014). Modelo de aseguramiento interno de la calidad para las instituciones de educación superior en el Marco del Mejoramiento continuo de la calidad de la educación superior en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: SECAB Publicaciones. Documento
Teerajarmorn, J., Jamornmann, U., & Rowlinson, P. (2003). The development of a methodology for scoring university instructors’ performance: A case study involving two Thai universities. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1), 55-68.
NIST The National Institute of Standards and Technology (2010). Baldridge Performance Excellence Program. USA: NIST. Sitio web
Van Kemenade, E., & Hardjono, T. W. (2009). Professionals freaking out: the case of accreditation in Dutch higher education. The TQM Journal, 21(5), 473-485. Documento
Van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 28,355-371. Documento
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Licencia Creative Commons
VIREF Revista de Educación Física se encuentra bajo Licencia Creative Commons: Atribución No Comercial Compartir Igual
