Genetic diversity in the germplasm bank of mulberry [Morusspp. (Rosales: Moraceae)] belonging to the “El Pilamo” Experimental Farm, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira (Risaralda), Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.14240Keywords:
AFLPs, molecular characterization, population structure, Morus spp.Abstract
Using amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), the genetic diversity of 31 accessions of the mulberry, Morus spp. (Moraceae) from the germplasm collection of the experimental farm “El Pílamo” (Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Colombia) were analyzed. Five primer combinations generated 152 polymorphic AFLP bands with an average correlation of 20% and allowed analysis of 64.12% of the total diversity present in these accessions. Genetic diversity, relationships among the accessions and the degree of population structure were evaluated. The primer combinations showed mean heterozygosity and genetic diversity values of 0.2332 and 0.2302, respectively. Cluster analysis showed that each of the 31 accessions has a different molecular genotype. Five groups were recognized. AMOVA analysis revealed that 77% of the diversity was within populations and 23% between the recognized molecular groups. The groups exhibited an FST value of 0.235 and a gene flow value of 1.1. The molecularly established groups showed elevated levels of both genetic distance and polymorphic loci, especially populations 1 and 5. We conclude that mulberry has high genomic complexity, as evidenced in the collection investigated here.
Downloads
References
Awasthi AK, Nagaraja GM, Naik GV, Kanginakudru S, Thangavelu K, Nagaraju J. 2004. Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC Genetics, 5: 1-8.
Bhattacharya E, Ranade SA. 2001. Molecular distinction amongst varieties of mulberry using RAPD and DAMD profiles. BMC Plant Biology, 1 (3): 1-8.
Cappellozza L, Coradazzi AT, Tornadore N. 1995. Studies on the phenotypic variability of seven cultivars of Morus alba L and three of Morus multicaulis P. (Moraceae) - Part I. Sericologia, 35 (2): 257-270.
Datta RK [Internet]. 2000. Mulberry cultivation and utilization in India. FAO electronic conference on mulberry for animal production (Morus L). Fecha de acceso: 23 de enero de 2012. Disponible en: <http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/X9895E/x9895e04.htm#TopOfPage>.
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12 (1): 13-15.
Excoffier L. 1995. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) version 1.55. Geneva (Italia): LGB, University of Geneva.
Fotadar RK, Dandin SB. 1998. Genetic divergence in mulberry. Sericologia, 38 (1): 115-125.
Hirano H. 1982. Varietal differences of leaf protein profiles in mulberry. Phytochemistry, 21: 1513-1518.
Kalpana D, Hyuk Choi S, Ki Choi T, Senthil K, Soo Lee Y. 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity among varieties of mulberry using RAPD and ISSR fingerprinting. Scientia Horticulturae, 134: 79-87.
Katsumata F. 1971. Shape of idioblast in mulberry leaves with special reference to the classification of mulberry trees. Journal of Sericulture Science of Japan, 40 (4): 312-322.
Lynch M, Milligan BG. 1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology, 3: 91-99
Mantel NA. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27: 209-220.
Miller MP. 1997. Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA). Version 1.3. Computer software distributed by author.
Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, 70: 3321-3323.
Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, 89: 538-590.
Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic, software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6: 288-295.
Rohlf FJ. 2002. NTSYS pc: Numerical taxonomy system, Version 2.1. Setauket (New York, U. S. A.): Exeter Publishing.
Sánchez MD. 2000. Mulberry, an exceptional forage available almost worldwide. [Internet], Fecha de acceso: 2012 enero 23. Disponible en: <http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/Mulberry/Papers/HTML/
Mulbwar2.htm>.
Shabir AW, Bhat MA, Malik GN, Kamili AS, Mir MR, Bhat SA, Wani N, Razvi SM, Akhtar S, Bhat KA. 2010. Molecular markers and their role in mulberry improvement. International Journal of Current Research, 4: 20-24.
Sharma A, Sharma R, Machii H. 2000. Assesment of genetic diversity in a Morus germplasm collection using fluorescence-based AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 101: 1049-1055.
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy, the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco (U. S. A.): W. H. Freeman & Co. p. 573.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 2012. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 4th ed. New York (U. S. A.): W. H. Freeman and Co. p. 937.
Thome J, Gonzáles DO, Beebe S, Duque MC. 1996. AFLP analysis of gene pool of a wild bean core collection. Crop Science, 36: 1375-1384.
Vijayan K, Chatterjee SN. 2003. ISSR profiling of Indian cultivars of mulberry (Morus spp.) and its relevance tobreeding programs. Euphytica, 131: 53-63.
Vijayan K, Nair CV, Chatterjee SN. 2009. Diversification of mulberry (Morus indica var. S36), a vegetatively propagated tree species. Caspian Journal of Enviromental Science, 7 (1): 23-30.
Vijayan K, Saratchandra B, Teixeira da Silva JA. 2011. Germplasm conservation in mulberry (Morus spp.). Scientia Horticulturae, 128: 371-379.
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, van der Lee T, Hornes M, Frijter A, Pot J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995. A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acid Research, 23: 4407-4414.
Wang ZW, Yu MD. 2001. AFLP analysis of genetic background of polyploid breeding materials of mulberry. Acta Sericologica Sinica, 27 (3): 170-176.
Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Medelian populations. Genetics, 28: 114-138.
Xiang ZH, Zhang Z, Yu MD. 1995. Preliminary report on the application of RAPD in systematics of Morus L. Acta Sericologica Sinica, 21 (4): 204-208.
Yamanouchi H, Koyama A, Takyu T, Muramatsu N. 2010. Nuclear DNA amounts in diploid mulberry species (Morus spp.). Journal of Insect Biotechnology and Sericology, 79 (1): 1-8.
Yang G W, Feng L C, Jing C J. 2003. Analysis of genetic structure variance among mulberry (Morus spp L.) Populations. Acta Sericologica Sinica. 29 (4): 323-329.
Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX. 1997. POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Canadá: Universidad de Alberta.
Zhao WG, Pan YL, Huang MR. 2000. RAPD analysis for the germplasm resources of genus mulberry. Acta Sericologica Sinica, 4: 1-8.
Zhao WG, Pan YL. 2004. Genetic diversity of genus Morus revealed by RAPD markers in China. International Journal of Agriculture y Biology, 6: 950-954.
Zhao WG, Miao XX, Pan YL, Huang YP. 2005. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the mulberry, Morus L. Plant Science, 168 (2): 519-525.
Zhao WG, Miao XX, Zang B, Zhang L, Pan YL, Huang YP. 2006. Construction of fingerprinting and genetic diversity of mulberry cultivars in China by ISSR markers. Acta Genetica Sinica, 33 (9): 851-860.
Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)- anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics, 20: 176-183.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors exclusively authorize the Actualidades Biológicas journal to edit and publish the submitted manuscript if its publication is recommended and accepted, without this representing any cost to the Journal or the University of Antioquia.
All the ideas and opinions contained in the articles are sole responsibility of the authors. The total content of the issues or supplements of the journal is protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, so they cannot be used for commercial purposes, but for educational purposes. However, please mention the Actualidades Biológicas journal as a source and send a copy of the publication in which the content was reproduced.
