Seed shadows, seedling survival and spatial distribution of the palm Oenocarpus bataua, in a forest of the Colombian Andes

Authors

  • Rosario Rojas-Robles National university of Colombia
  • Adolfo Correa National university of Colombia
  • Elizabeth Serna-Sánchez National university of Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.4724

Keywords:

Oenocarpus bataua, palm, recruitment, spatial distrubution patterns, seed dispersal

Abstract

The objective of this work was to quantify some aspects of the demography of a population of the Oenocarpus bataua palm such as seed shadows, seedling survival, density and spatial distribution of seeds, seedlings, juveniles and adults, in a premontane humid forest of Antioquia (Colombia), using circular plots and others of half hectare and one hectare. This palm of canopy and sub-canopy produces fruits of great size consumed by frugivores. The abundant production of fruits and the short distances of dispersion generate spatially restricted seed shadows, in spite of the high rates of removal, which produces an aggregated distribution of seedlings and juveniles. It can be related to defaunation of these forests by transformation of habitat and hunting, which reduce the quality and abundance of long-distance dispersers like large birds and mammals. Nevertheless, squirrels (Microsciurus mimulus y Sciurus granatensis) and agoutis (Dasyprocta punctata) contribute to short-distance dispersal, although to a lesser degree they performed dispersal to greater distances (53-62 m). In contrast to juveniles, the adults showed a random distribution pattern that could be explained by density-dependent mortality of the seeds, seedling and juvenile stages. In spite of limited dispersal, the large seeds of this palm generate robust seedlings and successful regeneration, to the point that O. bataua is one of the dominant species in the forest. These kinds of studies are important for the management and conservation of this promissory palm, whose abundance has declined due to intensive exploitation and transformation and reduction of its natural forest habitat.

|Abstract
= 333 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 215 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida LB, Galetti M. 2007. Seed dispersal and spatial distribution of Attalea geraensis (Arecaceae) in two remnants of Cerrado in Southeastern Brazil. Acta Oecologica, 32(2):180-187

Arango DA. 2004. Crecimiento y mortalidad de la rege-neración de Euterpe oleracea y Oenocarpus bataua (Medio Atrato, Colombia). Tesis Maestría en Bosques y Conservación Ambiental. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín.

Balick MJ, Gershoff S. 1981. Nutritional evaluation of the Jessenia bataua palm. Source of high quality protein and oil from tropical America. Economic Botany,25:261-271.

Balick MJ. 1992. Jessenia y Oenocarpus: Palmas aceiteras neotropicales dignas de ser domesticadas. Estudio FAO Producción y protección vegetal 88. FAO. Roma, Italia.

Barot S, Gignoux J, Menaut JC. 1999a. Population struc-ture and life cycle of Borassus aethiopum Mart.: Evi-dence of early senescence in a palm tree. Biotropica,31(3):439-448.

Barot S, Gignoux J, Menaut JC. 1999b. Demography of a savanna palm tree: predictions from comprehensive spatial pattern analyses. Ecology, 80(6):1987-2005.

Bernal R. Galeano G, HerdesonA. 1991. Notes on Oenocarpusin the Colombian Amazon. Brittonia, 43: 154 – 164.

Bodmer RE. 1991. Strategies of seed dispersal and seed predation in Amazonian ungulates. Biotropica,23(3):255-261.

Boll T, Svenning J-C, Vormisto J, Normand S, Grández C, Balslev H. 2005. Spatial distribution and environ-mental preferences of the piassaba palm Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) along the Pastaza and Urituyacu rivers in Peru. Forest Ecology and Management,213:175-183.

Borchsenius F, Borgtoft-Pedersen H, Balslev H. 1998. Manual to the palms of Ecuador. AAU Report 37: 1-240. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

Castaño G, Riascos E. 2000. Índice de Valor de Importancia. Pp. 47-57. En: Urrego DH, González C (ads.). Estu-dios Ecológicos en el área de influencia del proyecto hidroeléctrico Porce II. Empresas Públicas de Medellín. Medellín, Colombia.

Clark DA, Clark DB, Sandoval MR, Castro CMV.1995. Edaphic and human effects on ladscape-scala distributions of tropical rainforest palms. Ecology,76(8):2581-2594.

Clark JS, Macklin E, Wood L. 1998. Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecological Monographs, 68:213-235.

Clark PJ, Evans FC. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology, 35:445-453.

Collazos M, Mejía M. 1988. Fenología y poscosecha de milpesos Jessenia bataua (Mart) Burret. Acta Agro-nómica, 38 (1):53-63.

Dalling JW. 2002. Ecología de semillas. Pp. 345-375. En:Guariguata M, Kattan G (eds.). Ecología y conserva-ción de bosques neotropicales. Libro Universitario Regional. Cartago, Costa Rica.

Forget PM. 1990. Seed-dispersal of Vouacapoua americana(Caesalpiniaceae) by caviomorph rodents in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6:459-468.Forget PM, Muñoz E, Leigh EG. 1994. Predation by rodents and bruchid beetles on seeds of Scheeleapalms on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica, 26(4):420-426.

Fragoso JMV. 1997. Tapir-generated seed shadows: scale-dependent patchiness in the Amazon rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 85:519-529.

Galeano G, Bernal R. 1987. Palmas del departamento de Antioquia: Región Occidental. 1 ed. Universidad Na-cional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.

Henderson A. 2002. Evolution and ecology of palms. The New York Botanical Garden Press. U.S.A.

Henderson A, Galeano G, Bernal R. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton Univesity Press. Princeton (NJ), E. U. A.

Howe HF. 1985. Gomphothere fruits: a critique. The Ameri-can Naturalist, 125:853-865.

Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O’brien ST, Harms KE, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright SJ, Loo Lao S. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest. Science, 283:554-557.

Janzen DH, Vásques-Yañez C. 1991. Aspects of tropical seed ecology of relevance to management of tropical forest wildlands. Pp. 137-157. En: Gomez-Pompa A, Whitmore TC, Handley M (eds.). Rain forest regene-ration and management. Unesco France and Parthenon Press. England.

Jaramillo DF. 1989. Estudio general de suelos, erosión y uso potencial agropecuario para los proyectos hidro-eléctricos Porce II y Porce III. Empresas Públicas de Medellín. Medellín (Antioquia), Colombia.

Johnson D. 1988. Worldwide endangerment of useful palms. Advances in Economic Botany, 6:268-273.Khan F, Castro A. 1985. The palm community in a forest central Amazonia, Brazil. Biotropica, 17:210-216.

Kahn F, Mejía K. 1991. The palm communities of two terra firme forest in Peruvian Amazonia. Principes, 35:22-26.

Kahn F, de Granville JJ. 1992. Palms in forest ecosystems of Amazonia. Springer Verlang. Berlin, Germany.Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Menlo Park, (CA), E. U. A.

Küchmeister H, Webber A, Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I. 1998. A polinização e sua relação com a termogênese em espécies de Arecaceae e Annonaceae da Amazônia Central. Acta Amazonica, 28:217- 245.

Lawson E, Poethig RS.1995. Shoot development in plants: time for a change. Trends in Genetics, 11:263-268.

Lofgren A. 1995. Distribution patterns and population structure of an economically important Amazon palm, Jessenia bataua (Mart.) Burret ssp. bataua in Bolivia. Botaniska Institutionen Stockholmos Universitet,2:1-21.

Martínez-Ramos A. 1985. Claros, ciclos vitales de los árbo-les tropicales y regeneración natural de las selvas altas perennifolias. Pp. 191-239. En: Gómez–Pompa, del Amo S (eds.). Investigaciones sobre la regeneración de selvas altas en Veracruz, México. Vol. II. Alhambra Mexicana, México.

Miller C. 2002. Fruit production of the Ungurahua palm (Oenocarpus bataua subsp. bataua, Arecaceae) in an indigenous managed reserve. Economic Botany,56(2):165-176.

Morisita M. 1962. Id-index, a measure of dispersion of indi-viduals. Researches in Population Ecology, 4:1-7.Nathan R, Muller-LandauC. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Tree, 7(7): 278-285.

Núñez-Avellaneda L, Rojas-Robles R. 2008. Biología reproductiva y ecología de la polinización de la palma milpesos Oenocarpus bataua en los Andes colombia-nos. Caldasia, 30(1):99-123.

Peres CA, Baider C. 1997. Seed dispersal, spatial distri-bution and population structure of brazilnut trees (Ber-tholletia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13(4): 595-616.

Ruiz RR, Alencar JC. 2004. Comportamento fenologico da palmeira patauá (Oenocarpus bataua) na floresta Adolfo Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Acta Ama-zônica, 34:553-558.

Sheil D, Burslem D, Alder D. 1995. The interpretation and misinterpretation of mortality rate measures. Journal of Ecology, 83:331-333.

Silva MG, Tabarelli M. 2001. Seed dispersal, plant re-cruitment and spatial distribution of Bactris acantho-carpa Martius (Arecaceae) in a remnant of Atlantic forest in northeast Brazil. Acta Oecologica, 22:289-268.

Rojas-Robles et al.Sist P, Puig H. 1987. Regeneration, dynamique des po-pulations et dissemination d ́un palmier de Guyane française: Jessenia bataua (Mart.) Burret subsp. ologocarpa (Griseb. & H.Wendl.) Balick. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris 4º ser., 9, section B. Adansonia,3:317-336.

S i s t P. 1989. Strategies de regeneration de quelques palmiers en foret Guyanaise. Tesis de Doctorado. Universidad de Paris. Paris, France.

Smith-Gill SJ. 1975. Cytophysiological basis of disruptive pigmentary patterns in the leopard frog Rana pipiens. II. Wild type and mutant cell specific patterns. Journal of Morphology, 146:35-54.

Souza AF, Martins FR. 2002. Spatial distribution of an un-dergrowth palm in fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Plant Ecology, 164:141-155.

Svenning J-C. 1999. Recruitment of tall arborescent palms in the Yasuni National Park, amazonian Ecuador: are large treefall gaps important? Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15(3):355-366.

Svenning J-C. 2001a. On the role of micro environmental heterogeneity in the ecology and diversification of Neotropical rainforest palms (Arecaceae). Botanical Review, 67:1-53.

Svenning J-C. 2001b. Environmental heterogeneity, recruitment limitation and mesoscale distribution on palms in a tropical montane rain forest (Maqui-pucuna, Ecuador). Journal of Tropical Ecology,17:9 7-113.

Svenning J-C, Balslev H. 1999. Microhabitat-dependent recruitment of Iriartea deltoidea (Arecaceae) in ama-zonian Ecuador. Ecotropica, 5:69-74.

Vormisto J, Tuomisto H, Oksanen J. 2004. Palm distri-bution patterns in Amazonian rainforests: What is the role of topographic variation? Journal of Vegetation Science, 15:485-494.

Wright SJ, Zeballos H, Dominguez I, Gallardo MM, Moreno MC, Ibanez R. 2000. Poachers alter mam-mal abundance, seed dispersal, and seed predation in a Neotropical forest. Conservation Biology, 14(1): 227-239.

Wright SJ, Duber HC 2001. Poachers and forest fragmen-tation alter seed dispersal, seed survival, and seedling recruitment in the palm Attalea butyraceae with implications for tropical tree diversity. Biotropica,33(4):583-5595.

Published

2010-02-02

How to Cite

Rojas-Robles, R., Correa, A., & Serna-Sánchez, E. (2010). Seed shadows, seedling survival and spatial distribution of the palm <i>Oenocarpus bataua</i>, in a forest of the Colombian Andes. Actualidades Biológicas, 30(89), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.4724

Issue

Section

Full articles