Embryonic olfactory learning in larvae of Smilisca Phaeota (Cope, 1862) (Anura: Hylidae)

Authors

  • Paul David A. Gutiérrez-C. University of Antioquia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329404

Keywords:

embryonic olfactory learning, olfactory stimuli, tadpoles, Colombia, Smilisca phaeota

Abstract

The first demonstration of embryonic olfactory learning in a tropical anuran was documented in the Colombian treefrog Smilisca phaeota. It was determined that Smilisca tadpoles learned to recognize a specific odor and preferred it over others. Embryos were exposed to the olfactory substance (orange essence) in two different ways; first, an artificial stimulation involving injection of the substance into the egg; and second, a “natural” exposure mixing the odor in the water surrounding the developing embryo. Learning capacity was evaluated in an aquarium where two olfactory stimuli were presented, the odor experienced as embryos and a novel odor. Olfactory influence prior to hatching simultaneously created in the individuals an avoidance behavior toward the novel odor. In this case, larvae associated preferably to neutral stimuli such as water. For each method, control embryos were exposed to saline solution and water.

|Abstract
= 155 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 84 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blaustein AR, O’Hara RK, Olson DH. 1984. Kin preferencebehaviour is present after metamorphosis in Ranacascadae frogs. Animal Behavior, 32:445-450.

DeGroot MH. 1988. Probabilidad y estadística. 2a Ed.Addison Wesley Iberoamericana. México.Duellman WE. 1970. Hylid frogs of Middle America.University of Kansas Museum of Natural HistoryMonograph. U. S. A.

Espinal TS, Montenegro E. 1963. Formaciones vegetalesde Colombia. Memoria explicativa sobre el mapa deColombia. Instituto Geográfico “Agustín Codazzi”.Bogotá, Colombia.

Gamboa GJ, Berven KA, Schemidt RA, Fishwild TG,Jankens KM. 1991. Kin recognition by larvalwood frog (Rana sylvatica): effects of diet andprior exposure to conspecifics. Oecologia, 86:319-324.

Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuranembryos and larvae with notes on identification.Herpetologica, 16:183-190.

Griffiths SW. 2003. Learned recognition of conspecificsby fishes. Fish and Fisheries 4(3):256-268.

Grubb JC. 1973a. Olfactory orientation in breedingMexican toads, Bufo valliceps. Copeia, 1973:490-497.Grubb JC. 1973b. Olfactory orientation in Bufo woodhouseifowleri, Pseudacris clarki, and Pseudacris streckeri.Animal Behavior, 21:726-732.

Hepper PG. 1990. Foetal olfaction. Pp. 282-288. In:Macdonald, DW., Muller-Schwarze D, Natynczuk, SE(eds.). Chemical signals in vertebrates 5. PlenumPress. Nueva York (NY), U. S. A.

Hepper PG, Waldman B. 1992. Embryonic olfactory learningin frogs. The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 44B:179-197.

Pfennig DW. 1990. “Kin recognition” among spadefoottoad tadpoles: a side effect of habitat selection?Evolution, 44:785-798.

Rodríguez N, Armenteras D, Morales M, Romero M. 2004.Ecosistemas de los Andes colombianos. Instituto deInvestigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander vonHumboldt. Bogotá, Colombia.

Saidapur SK, Girish S. 2000. The ontogeny of kinrecognition in tadpoles of the toad Bufomelanostictus (Anura; Bufonidae). Journal ofBioscience, 25(3):267-273.

Smotherman WP. 1982. Odor aversion learning by the ratfetus. Physiology and Behavior, 29:769-771.

Spaeti U. 1978. Development of the sensory systems inthe larval and metamorphosing European grass frog(Rana temporaria L.). Journal für Hirnforschung(Journal of Brain Research), 19(6):543-575.

Stabell OB. 1984. Homing and olfaction in salmonids: acritical review with special reference to the Atlanticsalmon. Biological Reviews of the CambridgePhilosophical Society, 59(3):333-388.

Vargas-S F, Castro-H F. 1999. Distribución y preferenciasde microhábitat en anuros (Amphibia) en bosquemaduro y áreas perturbadas en Anchicayá, PacíficoColombiano. Caldasia, 21:95-109.

Published

2017-11-22

How to Cite

Gutiérrez-C., P. D. A. (2017). Embryonic olfactory learning in larvae of Smilisca Phaeota (Cope, 1862) (Anura: Hylidae). Actualidades Biológicas, 28(84), 8. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329404

Issue

Section

Full articles