Embryonic olfactory learning in larvae of Smilisca Phaeota (Cope, 1862) (Anura: Hylidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.329404Keywords:
embryonic olfactory learning, olfactory stimuli, tadpoles, Colombia, Smilisca phaeotaAbstract
The first demonstration of embryonic olfactory learning in a tropical anuran was documented in the Colombian treefrog Smilisca phaeota. It was determined that Smilisca tadpoles learned to recognize a specific odor and preferred it over others. Embryos were exposed to the olfactory substance (orange essence) in two different ways; first, an artificial stimulation involving injection of the substance into the egg; and second, a “natural” exposure mixing the odor in the water surrounding the developing embryo. Learning capacity was evaluated in an aquarium where two olfactory stimuli were presented, the odor experienced as embryos and a novel odor. Olfactory influence prior to hatching simultaneously created in the individuals an avoidance behavior toward the novel odor. In this case, larvae associated preferably to neutral stimuli such as water. For each method, control embryos were exposed to saline solution and water.
Downloads
References
Blaustein AR, O’Hara RK, Olson DH. 1984. Kin preferencebehaviour is present after metamorphosis in Ranacascadae frogs. Animal Behavior, 32:445-450.
DeGroot MH. 1988. Probabilidad y estadística. 2a Ed.Addison Wesley Iberoamericana. México.Duellman WE. 1970. Hylid frogs of Middle America.University of Kansas Museum of Natural HistoryMonograph. U. S. A.
Espinal TS, Montenegro E. 1963. Formaciones vegetalesde Colombia. Memoria explicativa sobre el mapa deColombia. Instituto Geográfico “Agustín Codazzi”.Bogotá, Colombia.
Gamboa GJ, Berven KA, Schemidt RA, Fishwild TG,Jankens KM. 1991. Kin recognition by larvalwood frog (Rana sylvatica): effects of diet andprior exposure to conspecifics. Oecologia, 86:319-324.
Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuranembryos and larvae with notes on identification.Herpetologica, 16:183-190.
Griffiths SW. 2003. Learned recognition of conspecificsby fishes. Fish and Fisheries 4(3):256-268.
Grubb JC. 1973a. Olfactory orientation in breedingMexican toads, Bufo valliceps. Copeia, 1973:490-497.Grubb JC. 1973b. Olfactory orientation in Bufo woodhouseifowleri, Pseudacris clarki, and Pseudacris streckeri.Animal Behavior, 21:726-732.
Hepper PG. 1990. Foetal olfaction. Pp. 282-288. In:Macdonald, DW., Muller-Schwarze D, Natynczuk, SE(eds.). Chemical signals in vertebrates 5. PlenumPress. Nueva York (NY), U. S. A.
Hepper PG, Waldman B. 1992. Embryonic olfactory learningin frogs. The Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 44B:179-197.
Pfennig DW. 1990. “Kin recognition” among spadefoottoad tadpoles: a side effect of habitat selection?Evolution, 44:785-798.
Rodríguez N, Armenteras D, Morales M, Romero M. 2004.Ecosistemas de los Andes colombianos. Instituto deInvestigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander vonHumboldt. Bogotá, Colombia.
Saidapur SK, Girish S. 2000. The ontogeny of kinrecognition in tadpoles of the toad Bufomelanostictus (Anura; Bufonidae). Journal ofBioscience, 25(3):267-273.
Smotherman WP. 1982. Odor aversion learning by the ratfetus. Physiology and Behavior, 29:769-771.
Spaeti U. 1978. Development of the sensory systems inthe larval and metamorphosing European grass frog(Rana temporaria L.). Journal für Hirnforschung(Journal of Brain Research), 19(6):543-575.
Stabell OB. 1984. Homing and olfaction in salmonids: acritical review with special reference to the Atlanticsalmon. Biological Reviews of the CambridgePhilosophical Society, 59(3):333-388.
Vargas-S F, Castro-H F. 1999. Distribución y preferenciasde microhábitat en anuros (Amphibia) en bosquemaduro y áreas perturbadas en Anchicayá, PacíficoColombiano. Caldasia, 21:95-109.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Actualidades Biológicas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors exclusively authorize the Actualidades Biológicas journal to edit and publish the submitted manuscript if its publication is recommended and accepted, without this representing any cost to the Journal or the University of Antioquia.
All the ideas and opinions contained in the articles are sole responsibility of the authors. The total content of the issues or supplements of the journal is protected under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, so they cannot be used for commercial purposes, but for educational purposes. However, please mention the Actualidades Biológicas journal as a source and send a copy of the publication in which the content was reproduced.