Funes: the paradox of memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.14041Keywords:
memory, thinking, oblivion, lapse, enigmaAbstract
This paper aims to follow Jacques Lacan's guide-lines on the approach that psychoanalysis must have to literary work, without succumbing to the misnamed applied psychoanalysis, respecting the author's words, without diagnostic aspirations, and from the enigmas the work offers. A reading of Jorge Luis Borges' Funes the Memorious is hoped.
Downloads
References
Borges, J.& Carrizo, A.(1997) Borges el memorioso.México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Borges, J. (2001) Funes el memorioso. En: El mundo, No.9. Barcelona, España: Ficciones.
Freud,S. El Moisés de Miguel Ángel. En: Obras Completas, Vol. XIII. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu editores.
Lacan,J. (1959) Seminario 6: El deseo y su interpretación. Texto no establecido. Recuperado de la base do-cumental Folio Views 4.2.
Lacan,J. (1989) Lituraterre. En: El Seminario de Jacques Lacan, libro 18:De un discurso que no fuera del semblante. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors authorize the Journal to publish their academic writings in the Journal’s webpage and in any other printed or electronic media propriety of the Journal, as well as in the databases the Journal is registered in. Affectio Societatis acknowledges that moral rights and decision criteria for the material’s subsequent publication in other media falls exclusively within the author’s authority, who for such cases is prompted to give explicit credit to Affectio Societatis..
