THREE BODIES AND ONLY ONE REAL PLEASURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.5312Keywords:
body, pleasure, RSI, OtherAbstract
Talking about body from a positivist perspective means the appearance of the body-soul duality; nevertheless, from an analytical viewpoint, we understand that the body, as a receptacle of the human, is paradoxically unrelated and ominous to ourselves. So, to apprehend such a concept it is necessary a topology of it in order to be different from being and entity. The text analyses what makes psychoanalysis different from other practices: its interpretation of the body as inhabited by the libido and its chance of pleasure mediated by the appearance of the signifier, going through the desire, the request and the sexuality; moments that, as well as psychism, inaugurate a real, symbolic and imaginary body as logs allowing its unification and the appearance of a fourth differentiating element, the enjoying substance and its topologic tying function.
Downloads
References
Lacan, J. (2003)El Seminariode Jacques Lacan, libro 11Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales, Buenos Aires, Paidós.---
------------(2002) El Seminariode Jacques Lacan,Libro 17El reverso del psicoanálisis, Buenos Aires,Paidós.
----------------(2004) El Seminariode Jacques Lacan, Libro 20Aun, Buenos Aires, Paidós.Soler, C. (2006)Los ensamblajes del cuerpo, Medellín,Asociación del Foro Lacaniano.
-----------(1998) Síntomas, Bogotá, Asociación del Campo Freudiano de Colombia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Affectio Societatis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors authorize the Journal to publish their academic writings in the Journal’s webpage and in any other printed or electronic media propriety of the Journal, as well as in the databases the Journal is registered in. Affectio Societatis acknowledges that moral rights and decision criteria for the material’s subsequent publication in other media falls exclusively within the author’s authority, who for such cases is prompted to give explicit credit to Affectio Societatis..
