Einstein and Freud: the question of ethics in science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.9508Keywords:
science, ethics, responsibility, sub-ject, psychoanalysisAbstract
Taking up again the interest of two great thinkers of the beginning of the 20thcentury, Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud, this article returns to the fundamental question of ethics in science, as distinct from the ethics of "science" as an autonomous entity to, finally, draw attention to the subject and his responsibility in scientific work.
Downloads
References
Braunstein, N. y otros. (1989) Psicología, ideología y ciencia. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
Bunge, M. (1986) Ética y ciencia. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veinte.
Camps, V. (1999) Las paradojas del individualismo. Barcelona: Crítica.
Castells, M.(1998) Era de la información. Economía, sociedad y cultura(2ª ed.). Madrid: Alianza.
Descartes, R. (2001) Meditaciones metafísicas. México: Porrúa.
Freud, S. (1979) “¿Por qué la guerra? (Einstein y Freud)”. En J. Strachey (Ed.) y J. L. Etcheverry y L. Wolfson (Trads.). Obras completas (Vol. XXII). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu (Trabajo original publicado en 1932).
Levy-Leblond, J.M. (2008) “No, la ciencia no es neutral.” En línea: http://ggalileo.blogspot.com/2008/11/la-ciencia-no-es-neutral-levi-leblond.html
Moulines, C.U. (1979) “La génesis del positivismo en su contexto científico.” En línea: http://www.ub.es/geocrit/geo19.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors authorize the Journal to publish their academic writings in the Journal’s webpage and in any other printed or electronic media propriety of the Journal, as well as in the databases the Journal is registered in. Affectio Societatis acknowledges that moral rights and decision criteria for the material’s subsequent publication in other media falls exclusively within the author’s authority, who for such cases is prompted to give explicit credit to Affectio Societatis..