The algorithm of transference as a predecessor of the master's discourse

Authors

  • Alexander Cruz Aponasenko Mental Health Center No. 1 “Dr. Hugo Rosarios ”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.6328

Keywords:

discourse, transference, subject-supposed-to-know, signifier, Lacan, Freud, Master, jouissance, analysis, S1

Abstract

This work establishes the counter argument between Lacan’s elaboration discussed in the Proposition of October 9 on the Psychoanalyst of the School, regarding the transference, and the quadripode called “master’s discourse”, delivered in the 1969-1970 seminar. In the “Proposition”, Lacan shows a formula commonly known as “algorithm of transference”, which formalizes the opening to the unconscious through the transference signifier operation and allows the possibility of the analytical work by the installation of the subject-supposed-to-know. We will see how this algorithm precedes the master’s discourse or the discourse of the unconscious. Thus we are going to establish a directionality in the analytical cure by observing the reversal of the master’s discourse that is the discourse of the analyst.

|Abstract
= 1455 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 251 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexander Cruz Aponasenko, Mental Health Center No. 1 “Dr. Hugo Rosarios ”

Diploma in University Teaching. Specialist in Domestic Violence: childhood and adolescence. Psychologist. Magister in Psychoanalysis. Honorary intern of the Mental Health Center No. 1 “Dr. Hugo Rosarios ”, Government of the city. Buenos Aires.

References

Freud, S. (2005). La interpretación de los sueños, Obras completas. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.

Lacan, J. (1987). Proposicióndel 9 de octubre de 1967 sobre el psicoanalista de la escuela, Momentos cruciales de la experiencia analítica. Buenos Aires: Manantial.

_,(2006). El seminario, libro 17. El reverso del Psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Published

2010-07-28

How to Cite

Cruz Aponasenko, A. (2010). The algorithm of transference as a predecessor of the master’s discourse. Affectio Societatis, 7(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.affs.6328

Issue

Section

Reflection Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)