El pensamiento del profesorado en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje en educación física
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.efyd.2053Palabras clave:
Profesor, Pensamiento, Acción, Currículo y didáctica.Resumen
Esta comunicación está organizada en cuatro partes. En primer lugar, hablaremos del origen de la investigación centrada en los procesos de pensamiento y acción del profesor, así bien sobre los presupuestos de orden epistemológico que organizan esa investigación. En segundo lugar, describiremos los temas y los problemas más estudiados en el ámbito del paradigma pensamiento y acción del profesorado de Educación Física. En tercer lugar, presentaremos los métodos y los procedimientos de investigación más utilizados en este programa de investigación. Finalmente, enfatizaremos la importancia y la utilidad que los estudios sobre los procesos de pensamiento y acción del profesor tienen sobre la innovación curricular y didáctica de la Educación Física.
Descargas
Citas
1. Anderson, W G., &Barrette, G. T. (Eds.). (1978). What's going on in gym: Descriptive studies of physical education classes. Motor Skills: Theory Into Practice, Monograph 1.
2. Byra, M. & Coulon, S. (1994). The effect of planning on the instructional behaviors of preservice teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13, 123-139.
3. Carreiro Da Costa, F., Carvalho, L, Onofre, M., & Diniz, J. (1992). As Representacóes de Sucesso e Insucesso Profisional em Professores de Educacáo Física. Boletim SPEF, n° 4, primavera, 11-30.
4. Carreiro Da Costa, F., Carvalha, L., Diniz, J. & Pestana, C. (1996). As expectativas de exercício profíssíonal dos alunos de um curso que habilita para a docencia: A formacáo (nao) passa por aqui? In, F.Carreiro da Costa, 1. Carvalho, M. Onofre,]. Diniz & C. Pestana (Eds.), Forrnacáo de Professores em Educacáo Física. Concepcóes, Investigacáo, Prática (pp. 57-74). Lisboa: Edicóes FMH.
5. Carreiro Da Costa, F. & Piéron, M. (1997). Teaching the curriculum: Policy and practice in Portugal and Belgium. The Curriculum Journal, 8 (2), 231-247.
6. Ciark, C & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 255-296), 3rd ed., New York: Mac Millan Publishing Company.
7. Eisner, E. (1992). Curriculum ideologies. ln, P.W Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 302-326). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
8. Eisner, E. & Vallance, E. (1978). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing. ENNIS, C. (1992). Curriculum theory as practiced: Case studies of operationalized value orientations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11,358-375.
9. Ennis, C. (1994). Knowledge and beliefs underlying curricular expertise. Quest, 46, 164-175.
10. Ennis, c. (1996). A model describing the Influence of values and context on student learning. In, S. Silverman & C. Ennís (Eds.), Student Learning in Physical Education. Applying Research to Enhance Learning (pp. 127-147). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
11. Ennis, C. & Chen, A. (1995). Teachers' value orientations in urban and rural school settings. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 41-50.
12. Ennis, e, Mueller, L. & Hooper, 1. (1990). The influence of teacher value orientations on curriculum planning within the parameters of a theoretical framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61 (4), 360-368.
13. Ennis, C., Ross, J. & Chen, A. (1992). The role of value orientations in curricular decision-making: A rational for teachers' goals and expectations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 38-47.
14. Ennis, C. &Zhu, W (1991). Value Orientations: A Description of Teachers' Goal for Student Learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 1, 33-40.
15. Ernest, p. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: a model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13-34.
16. Fenrstermacher, G. (1986). Philosophy of Research on Teaching. Three Aspects. ln M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research 00 Teaching. New York: Macmillan Publishing, 27- 49.
17. Griffid; D. & Housner, 1. (1996). The study of teacher cognition in sport pedagogy. In P. Schempp (Ed.), Scientific Development of Sport Pedagogy (pp. 103-122). New York: Warmann Münster.
18. Griffey; D. & Housner, L. (1999). Teacher thinking and decision making in physical education: Planning, and Implementing Instruction. In C. Hardy &M. Mawer (Eds.), Learning and Teaching in Physical Education (pp. 203- 214). London. Falmer Press.
19. Grossman, P.L. (1995). Teachers' knowledge. In Lorin W Anderson (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 20-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hargreaves, A. (1989). Curriculum and Assessment Reform. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
21. Housner, L. & Griffey, D. (1985). Teacher cognition- Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 45-53.
22. Imwold, C., Rider, Twardy, Olivier, Griffin, & Arsenault. (1984). The effect of planning on teaching behavior of preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4, 50-56.
23. Jackson, P (1968). Life in Classrooms. New York: Holt, Reinhart &Vinston.
24. Januário, C. (1992). O Pensamento do Professor - Relacáo entre as Decisóes Pré-Interactívas, os Comportamentos Interactivos de Ensino em Educacáo Física. Dissertacáo de Doutoramento, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
25. Jewett, A., Bain, L., & influye, C. (1995). The Curriculum Process in Physical Education. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
26. Lowyck & Clark, (1989) (Eds.). Teacher Thinking and Professional Action. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
27. Mcneil, J. (1996). Curriculum. A Comprehensive Introduction (5th edition). New York: Harper Collins.
28. Metzler, M. &Young, J. (1984). The relationship between teacher’s preactive planning and student process measures. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 356-364.
29. Neves, (1995). Os Professores e os Programas de Educacáo Física. Representacóes e Atitudes. Disssertacáo de Mestrado. Universidade do Porto.
30. Neves, R. & Carreiro Da Costa, F. (1998). Os professores e os programas de educacáo física. In, M. Gonza- 1ez Valeiro, R. Martín Acero, J. Salvador Alonso, J. Fernández Romero, & M. Bobo Arce (Eds.), Educación Física e Deporte no Século XXI (pp. 527- 536). Santiago: Edición Universidade da Coruna.
31. Onofre, M. (1992). OAuto-Conceito de Eficacia em Educacáo Física. Dissertacáo de Mestrado nao publicada. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.
32. Onofre, M. (2000). Conhecimenro Prático, Auto-Eficácia e Qualidade do Ensino. Um Estudo Multicaso em Professores de Educacáo Física. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Uníversidade Técnica de Lisboa.
33. Onofre, M. & Carreiro da Costa, F. (1994). O Sentímento de Capacidade na Intervancáo Pedagógica em Educacáo Física. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Educacáo Física, n? 9,15-26.
34. Onofre, M. & Carreiro da Costa, F. (1996). Technical culture of physical education teacher with high and low self-efficacy perception in interactive teaching. A qualitative study. In, R. Lidor, E. Eldar & 1.Hararí (Eds.), Bridging the Gaps Between Disciples and Instruction. Proceedings of the 1995 AIESEP World Congress (pp. 173-178). Telavive: Wingate Institute.
35. Onofre, M., Carreiro da Costa, F. & Marcelo, C. (2003). Pratical Knowledge, Self-Efficacy and Qualiry of Teaching. Multicase Study in PE Teachers. In 1. Sena Lino, R. Omelas, F. Carreiro da Costa & M. Piéron. Innovatíon and New Technologies in Physical Education, Sport, Research and/on Teacher and Coach Preparation, Proceedings of the Madeira Aiesep Congress, CD.
36. Pajares, F. M. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy constructo Review of Educational Research, 62,307-332.
37. Pérez Gómez, A. (1985). Paradigmas contemporáneos de investigación didáctica. In J. Gimeno &A. Pérez Gómez, Madrid: Akal, pp. 95-138.
38. Piéron, M. (1988). Enseigment dés Activités Physiques. Observatíon et Recherche. Líege: Univeesité de Liege.
39. Piéron, M. (1993). Analyser l'Enseignernent pour Mieux Enseigner. París: Editions Revue EPS.
40. Piéron, M. (1999). Para una Enseñanza Eficaz de las Actividades Físico Deportivas. Barcelona: INDE.
41. Rocha, L. & Carreirodacosta, F. (1999). The influence of primary school teachers' experience is in school physical education and their present life styles in their thoughts and practices. In, R. Feingold, R. Rees, G. Barrene, L. Florentino, S. Virgilio, & E. Kowalski (Eds.), Education for Lite. Proceedings of the AIESEP World Sport Science Congress (pp. 163-170). New York: Adelphi University.
42. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. ln, P.W Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 402.435). New York: Mac Millan.
43. Sparkes, A, (1992). The Paradigms Debate: An Extended Review and a Celebration of Diference of Diference. In Andrew C. Sparkes (Ed.), Research in Physical Education and Sport. ExploringAlternative Views. London: Falmer Press, 9-59.
44. Toja, B. (2001). Estudio de un programa de formación en preservicio en Educación Física: La Investigación-Acción como estrategia de formación e investigación. Universidad de A Coruña. Tesis doctoral no publicada.
45. Tyson, 1. (1996). Context of schools. In, S. Silverman & C. Ennís (Eds.), Student Learning in Physical Education. Applying Research to Enhance Instruction (pp. 55-79). Charnpaign: Human Kinetics.
46. Underwood, G. E. (1986). Curriculum theory and practice in physícal education in Secondary Schools in England and Wales. In, Maurice Piéron & George Graham (Eds.), Sport Pedagogy (pp. 171-177). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
47. Vieira, F. (2002). As Orientacóes Educativas dos Professores de Educacáo Física e o Curriculo Institucional. Dissertacáo de Mestrado náo publicada, Faculdade de Motricidade Huamana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa
