Prevalencia de Anaplasma spp. en el ámbito mundial: revisión sistemática 1978–2018

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.hm.v10n1a04

Palavras-chave:

prevalencia, Anaplasma spp., revisión sistemática, metaanálisis

Resumo

Introducción: el objetivo de este estudio fue describir la prevalencia mundial de Anaplasma spp. y las prevalencias específicas según lugar y año de estudio, especie y técnica diagnóstica con base en investigaciones originales reportadas en la literatura científica mundial.

Métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática en Medline-Pubmed y SciELO con 14 estrategias de búsqueda, siguiendo las fases de la guía PRISMA y garantizando exhaustividad y reproducibilidad. Se incluyeron 221 estudios, la mayoría publicados entre 2011 y 2015.

Resultados: los países con mayor número de estudios fueron Estados Unidos (n=32), China y Alemania (n=15), Polonia (n=14) y Brasil (n=12). La principal prueba diagnóstica fue la PCR (70 %). La mayor proporción de investigaciones fue en rumiantes (30,3 %), garrapatas (23,6 %) y cánidos (16,8 %), en menor proporción se estudiaron los felinos (3,2 %) y équidos (1,8 %). En los 221 estudios, la población fue de 337.119 individuos en quienes se halló una prevalencia global del 6,28 % (21.175). Las mayores prevalencias específicas se hallaron en los équidos con un 25,67 % (n=409) y los cérvidos con 21,14 % (n=6.215). La frecuencia de positivos por microscopía fue 49,4 % (n=1.747) y por PCR 10,57 % (n=90.891).

Conclusiones: la anaplasmosis es una enfermedad zoonótica importante por su distribución mundial, amplio rango de hospederos y vectores, su elevada prevalencia en múltiples especies y su elevado riesgo para la salud humana y animal.  

|Resumo
= 842 veces | PDF (ESPAÑOL (ESPAÑA))
= 644 veces|

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Johanna Urán, Universidad de Antioquia

Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia.

Jaiberth Antonio Cardona Arias, Universidad de Antioquia

Escuela de Microbiología.

Referências

Svitálková Z, Haruštiaková D, Mahríková L, Ber-thová L, Slovák M, Kocianová E, et al. Anaplasma phagocytophilum prevalence in ticks and rodents in an urban and natural habitat in South-Western Slova-kia. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2015 May 17 [cited 2017 May 17];8(1):276. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25980768

Salvagni CA, Dagnone AS, Gomes TS, Mota JS, An-drade GM, Baldani CD, et al. Serologic evidence of equine granulocytic anaplasmosis in horses from cen-tral West Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Veterinária [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2017 May 17];19(3):135–40. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-29612010000300002&lng=en&tlng=en

Yang J, Liu Z, Niu Q, Liu J, Guan G, Xie J, et al. First molecular survey and identification of Anaplasma spp. in white yaks (Bos grunniens) in China. Parasitology [In-ternet]. 2016 May 22 [cited 2017 May 17];143(6):686–91. Available from: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S003118201600041X

Rikihisa Y, Bauer ME, Haddad N, Dugat T, Lagrée A-C, Maillard R, et al. Opening the black box of Ana-plasma phagocytophilum diversity: current situation and future perspectives. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2017 May 17];5. Available from: https://aplicacionesbibliote-ca.udea.edu.co:2054/pmc/articles/PMC4536383/pdf/fcimb-05-00061.pdf

Ismail N, Bloch KC, Mcbride JW. Human Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis. [Internet] 2010 [cited 2017 May 17]; Available from: https://aplicacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2054/pmc/articles/PMC2882064/pdf/ni-hms157694.pdf

Zhang L, Wang G, Liu Q, Chen C, Li J, Long B, et al. Molecular Analysis of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Isolated from Patients with Febrile Diseases of Un-known Etiology in China. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 May 17];8(2). Available from: https://apli-cacionesbiblioteca.udea.edu.co:2054/pmc/articles/PMC3579781/pdf/pone.0057155.pdf

Brito LG, Oliveira MC de S, Rocha RB, Silva Netto FG da, Marim AD, Souza GCR de, et al. Anaplasma margi-nale infection in cattle from south-western Amazonia. Pesqui Veterinária Bras [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2017 May 17];30(3):249–54. Available from: http://www.scie-lo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-736X2010000300011&lng=en&tlng=en

Ait Lbacha H, Alali S, Zouagui Z, El Mamoun L, Rhalem A, Petit E, et al. High Prevalence of Ana-plasma spp. in Small Ruminants in Morocco. Trans-bound Emerg Dis [Internet]. 2017 Feb [cited 2017 May 17];64(1):250–63. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/tbed.12366

Sasaki H, Ichikawa Y, Sakata Y, Endo Y, Nishigaki K, Matsumoto K, et al. Molecular survey of Rick-ettsia, Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma infection of do-mestic cats in Japan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2017 May 17];3:307–10. Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877959X12001136/1-s2.0-S1877959X12001136-main.pdf?_tid=5cac7a8e-3b4c-11e7-9744-00000aacb361&acdnat=1495058661_887a0d0518f8c05ab15041bd838a229b

Graf PCF, Chretien JP, Ung L, Gaydos JC, Richards AL. Prevalence of Seropositivity to Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae and Anaplasma phagocytophi-lum in a Large, Demographically Diverse US Sample. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2008 Jan 1 [cited 2017 May 17];46(1):70–7. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/524018

Xia Z, Yu D, Mao J, Zhang Z, Yu J. The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs in China. J Helminthol [Internet]. 2012 Jun 11 [cited 2017 May 18];86(02):185–9. Available from: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0022149X11000198

Kalinova Z, Halanova M, Cislakova L, Sulinova Z, Jarcuska P. Occurrence of IgG antibodies to Ana-plasma phagocytophilum in humans suspected of Lyme borreliosis in eastern Slovakia. Ann Agric Environ Med [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2017 May 18];16(2):285–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20047263

Atif FA. Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phago-cytophilum: Rickettsiales pathogens of veterinary and public health significance. Parasitol Res [Internet]. 2015 Nov 7 [cited 2017 May 18];114(11):3941–57. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-015-4698-2

May K, Strube C. Prevalence of Rickettsiales (Ana-plasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp.) in hard ticks (Ixodes ricinus) in the city of Hamburg, Germany. Parasitol Res [Internet]. 2014 Jun 13 [cited 2017 May 18];113(6):2169–75. Available from: http://link.spring-er.com/10.1007/s00436-014-3869-x

Skarphédinsson S, lyholm BF, ljungberg M, Søgaard P, Kolmos HJ, Nielsen LP. Detection and identification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdor-feri, and Rickettsia helvetica in Danish Ixodes ricinus ticks. APMIS [Internet]. 2007 Mar 13 [cited 2017 May 18];115(3):225–30. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_256.x

Hao Q, Geng Z, Hou XX, Tian Z, Yang XJ, Jiang WJ, et al. Seroepidemiological investigation of lyme disease and human granulocytic anaplasmosis among peo-ple living in forest areas of eight provinces in China. Biomed Environ Sci [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2017 May 18];26(3):185–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23425801

Silvestre BT, Silveira JAG, Meneses RM, Facury-Filho EJ, Carvalho AU, Ribeiro MFB. Identification of a ver-tically transmitted strain from Anaplasma marginale (UFMG3): Molecular and phylogenetic characteriza-tion, and evaluation of virulence. Ticks Tick Borne Dis [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 May 18];7(1):80–4. Avail-able from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar-ticle/pii/S1877959X15300078

Luz M, Letelier S, Manríquez JJ, Rada G. Medicina basada en evidencia. Revisiones sistemáticas y metaa-nálisis: ¿son la mejor evidencia? Rev Méd Chile [Inter-net]. 2005 [cited 2017 May 18];133:246–9. Available from: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rmc/v133n2/art15.pdf

Battilani M, De Arcangeli S, Balboni A, Dondi F. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of Anaplasma. Infect Genet Evol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 May 18];49:195–211. Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1567134817300217/1-s2.0-S1567134817300217-main.pdf?_tid=6d43391e-3bd3-11e7-b25e-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1495116671_c3b949d90f5192a8367d6d3918e868e1

Ghosh S, Nagar G. Problem of ticks and tick-borne diseases in India with special emphasis on progress in tick control research: A review. J Vector Borne Diseases. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 May 18]; Available from: http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/514259.pdf

McCallon BR. Prevalence and economic aspects of an-aplasmosis. In: Proceedings of the Sixth National Ana-plasmosis Conference. Stillwater (Oklahoma): Heritage Press; 1973. p. pp. 1-3.

Sharma A, Das Singla L, Kaur P, Singh Bal M, Kaur Batth B, Dutt Juyal P. Prevalence and haemato-bio-chemical profile of Anaplasma marginale infection in dairy animals of Punjab (India). Asian Pac J Trop Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 May 18];6:139–44. Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1995764513600103/1-s2.0-S1995764513600103-main.pdf?_tid=f0c04d74-3be0-11e7-b473-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1495122475_8d75dbb4d95ffe0d8150f67433814811

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.), National Center for Infectious Diseases (U.S.). Emerg-ing infectious diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 1995.;1(2).

De Waal DT. Anaplasmosis Control and Diagno-sis in South Africa. [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2017 May 18]; Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05327.x/asset/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05327.x.pdf?v=1&t=j2ui5r1f&s=4f27684cea619ac2766319c9af6c78b0ec22ac90

Slivinska K, Víchová B, Werszko J, Szewczyk T, Wróblewski Z, Pet ’ko B, et al. Molecular surveil-lance of Theileria equi and Anaplasma phagocy-tophilum infections in horses from Ukraine, Po-land and Slovakia. Vet Parasitol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 May 18];215:35–7. Available from: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0304401715300637/1-s2.0-S0304401715300637-main.pdf?_tid=c6bab5d6-3be1-11e7-8362-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1495122834_c8859c98a462f31b8fd2b1d64a8f29c3

Ben Said M, Belkahia H, Héni MM, Bouattour A, Ghorbel A, Gharbi M, et al. Seroprevalence of Ana-plasma phagocytophilum in well maintained horses from northern Tunisia. Trop Biomed [Internet]. 2014 Sep [cited 2017 May 18];31(3):432–40. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25382469

Sharma A, Singla LD, Kaur P, Bal MS. PCR and ELISA vis-à-vis Microscopy for Detection of Bovine Ana-plasmosis: A Study on Associated Risk of an Upcom-ing Problem in North India. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 May 18]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4355815/pdf/TSWJ2015-352519.pdf

Publicado

2020-01-08

Como Citar

Urán, J., & Cardona Arias, J. A. (2020). Prevalencia de Anaplasma spp. en el ámbito mundial: revisión sistemática 1978–2018. Hechos Microbiológicos, 10(1-2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.hm.v10n1a04

Edição

Seção

Artículos de revisión