Publication among academic staff and students: an analysis from the ethical perspective

  • María Teresa Urrutia Soto Nurse, PhD. Professor, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. email: murrutis@uc.cl
Keywords: Authorship, ethics, students.

Abstract

This article analyzes, from the ethical perspective, the authorship of particles carried out among students and professors and their potential conflicts. After the literature review, it has been found that the Vancouver criteria that should be fulfilled for the attribution of authorship of an article are not popularly known by students and academic staff. Many problems are posed in this area, among which the following are highlighted: ghost writer, honorary author, and incorrect assignment in the order authors should appear. The professor-student relationship brings with it implicit risks that could lead to conflict, against which it is the academician who should be cautious to curtail any ethical fault when assigning the authors. The measures recommended to avoid conflicts of authorship among students and academic staff are: early assignment of the authors, reflection among academicians, education to students/academic staff, and external control conducted by journal editors. Conclusion is that lack of awareness of the criteria of authorship by academicians and students is the principal problem in the attribution of authorships. It is indispensable to improve this knowledge and look after the application of said criteria in practice.

 

How to cite this article: Urrutia MT. Publication among Academic Staff and Students: an Analysis from the Ethical Perspective. Invest Educ Enferm. 2015; 33(3):

|Abstract
= 55 veces | PDF
= 61 veces| HTML RESUMEN
= 1 veces| HTML ENGLISH
= 0 veces| HTML ESPAÑOL
= 3 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Real Academia de la Lengua Española. Diccionario de la Real Academia de la Lengua Española [Internet]; 2014 [cited 14 Jan 2014]. Available from: http://lema.rae.es/drae/?val=autor.

(2) Lo B. Authorship and its responsibilities. In: Lo B. Ethical Issues in Clinical Research. A practical guide. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

(3) Karani R, Ognibene F, Fallar R, Gliatto P. Medical students experiences with authorship in biomedical research: a national survey. Academic Medicine. 2013; 88(3):364-8.

(4) Carlson K, Ross J. Publication ethics: conflicts, copyright, permission, and authorship. J Perianesth Nurs. 2010; 25(4):263-71.

(5) Street J, Rogers W, Israel M, Braunack-Mayer Annette. Credit where is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Sci Med. 2010; 70:1458-65.

(6) International Committe of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJ). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals [Internet]. [cited 14 Jan 2014]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

(7) Lolas F, Outomuro D. Ética en la publicación de los resultados de la investigación. En Lolas, Quezada y Rodríguez editores. Investigación en salud dimensión ética. Santiago: Universidad de Chile; 2006.

(8) Hren D, Sambunjak D, Ivanis A, Marusic M, Marusic A. Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience. J Med Ethics. 2007; 33:428-32.

(9) Strange K. Authorship: Why not just toss a coin? Am J Phisiol Cell Phisiol. 2008; 84(9):811-21.

(10) Feeser R, Simon J. The ethical assignment of authorship in scientific publications: Issues and Guidelines. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15:963-69.

(11) Gaberson K. Co-author or teacher? AORN J. 2009; 90(1):19-22.

(12) Gross D, Alhusen J, Mowinski B. Authorship ethics with dissertation manuscript option. Res Nurs Health. 2012; 35:431-34.

(13) Eysenbach G. Medical students see that academic misconduct is common. BMJ. 2001; 26(322):1307.

(14) Morse J. Negotiating authorship for doctoral dissertation publications. Qual Res. 2009; 19(1):3.

(15) Heinrich K. From presenter to author. Best practices to avoid publishing pitfalls. Nurse Educ. 2013; 38(1):5-8.

(16) Lypson M, Philibert I. An ethical argument for preserving medical trainee authorship. Acad Med. 2013; 88(10):1404.

(17) Reyes H. Honestidad y buena fe: dos pilares en la ética de la spublicaciones bioemdicas. Rev Med Chile. 2007; 135:415-8.

(18) Wager E. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas. 2009; 62:109-12.

Published
2015-09-29
How to Cite
Urrutia SotoM. T. (2015). Publication among academic staff and students: an analysis from the ethical perspective. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 33(3). Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/24468
Section
REFLECTION ARTICLES / ARTÍCULO DE REFLEXION / ARTIGO DE REFLEXÃO