Effectiveness of nursing case management versus usual care for blood pressure control in adults with hypertension: a systematic review
Keywords:adult, case management, hypertension, nursing care, patient care planning, primary health care, systematic review
Objective. To synthesize the best available evidence regarding the effectiveness of nursing case management in primary health care, compared to usual care, in improving blood pressure in adults over 18 years with hypertension.
Methods. Systematic review that includes studies carried out with adult patients diagnosed with hypertension, with or without other concomitant chronic diseases, followed-up by a case manager nurse, who evaluated the effectiveness of case management in the improvement of blood pressure. A critical evaluation of the studies was made and the results of interest were described using the instruments and tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, the results of similar measures were not grouped in statistical meta-analysis. A narrative and tabular format was used to synthesize and present them.
Results. Six randomized controlled trials were critically evaluated and included in the review. The total sample was 1963 participants. The results showed the outcomes compared at baseline and at the end of follow-up (six or twelve months). Regarding the main outcome, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, there was some reduction in the group followed-up through case management in studies lasting six months; however, the impossibility of comparing the findings poses limitations to answering the questions in this review.
Conclusions. Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, the narrative and tabular analysis demonstrated that short-term case management in primary care (six-month studies) helped to reduce blood pressure levels, although the level of evidence for these results is low or very low.
Malachias MVB, Souza WKSB, Plavnik FL, Rodrigues CIS, Brandão AA, Neves MFT, et al. 7th Brazilian Arterial Hypertension Guidelines. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016; 107(Suppl 3):1–83.
World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 09]. Avaliable from: https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2018/en/
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2018: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 09]. Available from: https://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2019/julho/25/vigitel-brasil-2018.pdf
Mendes EV. The care of chronic conditions in primary health care: the imperative of consolidating family health strategy. Brasília: Pan American Health Organization. 2012 [cited 2019 Dec 09]. Available from: http://www.conass.org.br/biblioteca/o-cuidado-das-condicoes-cronicas-na-atencao-primaria-a-saude/
Hebert PL, Sisk JE, Tuzzio L, Casabianca JM, Pogue VA, Wang JJ, Chen Y,Cowles C, McLaughlin MA. Nurse-led Disease Management for Hypertension Control in a Diverse Urban Community: a Randomized Trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2012; 27(6):630–9.
Cicolini G, Simonetti V, Comparcini D, Celiberti I, Di Nicola M, Capasso LM, et al. Efficacy of a nurse-led email reminder program for cardiovascular prevention risk reduction in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2014; 51(6):833–43.
Dean SC, Kerry SM, Khong TK, Kerry SR, Oakeshott P. Evaluation of a specialist nurse-led hypertension clinic with consultant backup in two inner city general practices: randomized controlled trial. Fam. Pract. 2014; 31(2):172-9.
Ozpancar N, Pakyuz SC, Topcu B. Hypertension management: what is the role of case management? Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP. 2017; 51:e03291.
Silva ATM, Mantovani MF, Moreira RC, Arthur JP, Souza RM. Nursing case management for people with hypertension in primary health care: A randomized controlled trial. Res. Nurs. Health. 2020; 43(1):68-78.
Kim GS, Ko IS, Lee T, Kim EJ. Effects of hypertension management. JPN J. Nurs. Sci. 2014; 11:35-43.
İncirkus K, Nahcivan NÖ. A guide for chronic disease management: the chronic care model. F. N. Hem. Derg. 2015; 23(1):66-75.
Reynolds, R., Dennis, S., Hasan, I. et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam. Pract. 2018; 19:11.
Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood, M, Ward, HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2008; 10(5):348–54.
Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, Claesson C. The Brief Medication Questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence. Patient Educ. Couns. 1999; 37(2):113–24.
Badia X, Roca-Cusachs A, Dalfó A, Gascón G, Abellán J, Lahos R, et al. Validation of the short form of the Spanish Hypertension Quality of Life Questionnaire (MINICHAL). Clin. Ther. 2002; 24(12):2137–54.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473–83.
Gonzales RIC, Casarin SNA, Caliri MHL, Sassaki CM, Monroe AA, Villa TCS. Case management: a new focus on health care. Rev Latino-Am Enferm. 2003; 11(2):227–31
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017.
Mantovani MF, Kalinke LP; Silva ATM, Arthur JP, Radovanovic CAT, Bortolato-Major, C. Effectiveness of case management performed by nurses for blood pressure control in adults with hypertension a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2018; 16(9):1889-784.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):196–207
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editor(s). Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach (updated October 2013). GRADE Working Group; 2013.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009; 62 (10):1006–12.
Leiva A, Aguiló A, Fajó-Pascual M, Moreno L, Martín MC, Garcia EM et al. Efficacy of a brief multifactorial adherence-based intervention in reducing blood pressure: a randomized clinical trial. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2014; 8:1683-90.
Beune EJAJ, Charante EPM, Beem L, Mohrs J, Agyemang CO, Ogedegbe G et al. Culturally adapted hypertension education (CAHE) to improve blood pressure control and treatment adherence in patients of African origin with uncontrolled hypertension: cluster-randomized trial. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90103.
Guirardo EA, Ribera EP, Huergo VP, Borras JM, Group., ADIEHTA. Knowledge and adherence to antihypertensive therapy in primary care: results of a randomized trial. Gac. Sanit. 2011; 25(1):62-7.
Tonstad S, Alm CS, Sandvik E. Effect of nurse counselling on metabolic risk factors in patients with mild hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2007; 6:160-4.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.