Validation into Spanish of a Scale to Detect the Post-intensive Care Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n1e09Keywords:
survivors, critical care, syndrome, patient health questionnaire, psychometricsAbstract
Objective. This work sought to validate the Spanish version of the scale Healthy Aging Brain-Care Monitor (HABC-M) scale as clinical tool to detect the Post-intensive Care Syndrome.
Methods. Psychometric study, conducted in adult intensive care units from two high-complexity university hospitals in Colombia. The sample was integrated by 135 survivors of critical diseases with mean age of 55 years. The translation of the HABC-M was carried out through transcultural adaptation, evaluating content, face, and construct validity and determining the scale’s reliability.
Results. A replica was obtained of the HABC-M scale in its version into Spanish, semantically and conceptually equivalent to the original version. The construct was determined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), evidencing a three-factor model comprised of the subscales: cognitive (6 items), functional (11 items), and psychological (10 items), with a confirmatory factor index (CFI) of 0.99, a Tucker Lewis index (TLI) of 0.98, and an approximate root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.073 (90% CI: 0.063 – 0.084). Internal consistency was determined through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, obtaining 0.94, (95% CI 0.93 – 0.96).
Conclusion. The Spanish of the HABC-M scale is a tool with adequate psychometric properties, validated and reliable to detect the Post-intensive Care Syndrome.
Downloads
References
1. Rojas V. Humanización De Los Cuidados Intensivos. Rev. Méd. Clín. Las Condes. 2019; 30(2):120–5.
2. Besen B, Park M. “My (critically ill) patient has only a pneumonia” - the risk of oversimplification and the evidence of post-ICU syndrome. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2016; 62(1):29–31.
3. Stam H, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Covid-19 and Post Intensive Care Syndrome: A Call for Action. J. Rehabil. Med. 2020; 52(4):1–4.
4. Azoulay E, Vincent J, Angus D, Arabi Y, Brochard L, Brett S, et al. Recovery after critical illness: putting the puzzle together—a consensus of 29. Crit. Care. 2017; 21(1):296.
5. Labuzetta J, Rosand J, Vranceanu A. Review : Post ‑ Intensive Care Syndrome : Unique Challenges in the Neurointensive Care Unit. Neurocrit. Care. 2019; 31(3):534–45.
6. Davidson J, Hopkins R, Louis D I. Post-intensive care syndrome. 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 23]. Available from. https://www.sccm.org/MyICUCare/THRIVE/Post-intensive-Care-Syndrome
7. Wang S, Allen D, Perkins A, Monahan P, Khan S, Lasiter S, et al. Validation of a New Clinical Tool for Post–Intensive Care Syndrome. Am. J. Crit. Care. 2019; 28(1):10–8.
8. Myers E, Smith D, Allen S, Kaplan L. Post-ICU syndrome. J. Am. Acad. Physician Assist. 2016; 29(4):34–7.
9. Schofield-Robinson O, Lewis S, Smith A, Mcpeake J, Alderson P. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors (Review). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;11(11):CD012701.
10. Quintana A, Pérez S, Ponce G. Síndrome de Cuidados Post-Intensivos en adultos con alteraciones oncológicas hospitalizados o de egreso. XI Coloquio Panamericano de Investigación en Enfermería. Cuba; 2018. p. 1–9.
11. Brown S, Bose S, Banner-Goodspeed V, Beesley S, Dinglas V, Hopkins R, et al. Approaches to Addressing Post–Intensive Care Syndrome among Intensive Care Unit Survivors. A Narrative Review. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2019; 16(8):947–56.
12. Barragán J, Moreno C, Hernández N. Nivel de independencia funcional tras el alta de cuidados intensivos. Med. Interna Méx. 2018;34(5):683–91.
13. Busico M, das Neves A, Carini F, Pedace M, Villalba D, Foster C, et al. Programa de seguimiento al alta de la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Med. Intensiva. 2019; 43(4):243–54.
14. Duarte P, Costa J, Duarte S, Taba S, Lordani C, Osaku E, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Intensive Care Unit Survivors: Experience of a Multidisciplinary Outpatient Clinic in a Teaching Hospital. Clinics. 2017; 72(12):764–72.
15. Torres J, Carvalho D, Molinos E, Vales C, Ferreira A, Dias C, et al. The impact of the patient post-intensive care syndrome components upon caregiver burden. Med. Intensiva (English Ed). 2017; 41(8):454–60.
16. Marra A, Pandharipande P, Girard T, Patel M, Hughes C, Jackson J, et al. Co-Occurrence of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Problems Among 406 Survivors of Critical Illness. Crit. Care Med. 2018; 46(9):1393–401.
17. Major M, Kwakman R, Kho M, Connolly B, Mcwilliams D, Denehy L, et al. Surviving critical illness: what is next? An expert consensus statement on physical rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Crit. Care. 2016; 20(354):1–10.
18. Bryant S, McNabb K. Postintensive Care Syndrome. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin. North Am. 2019; 31(4):507–16.
19. Narváez-Martínez M, Gómez Tovar L, Henao-Castaño Á. Instrumentos para valorar el síndrome poscuidado intensivo, revisión de alcance. Enferm. Clín. 2022; 32(6):440–50.
20. Sevin C, Bloom S, Jackson J, Wang L, Wesley Ely E, Stollings J. Comprehensive care of ICU survivors: Development and implementation of an ICU recovery center. J. Crit. Care. 2018; 46:141–8.
21. Hodgson C, Udy A, Bailey M, Barrett J, Bellomo R, Bucknall T, et al. The impact of disability in survivors of critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(7):992–1001.
22. Hatch R, Young D, Barber V, Griffiths J, Harrison D, Watkinson P. Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: A UK-wide prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):1–13.
23. Jensen J, Egerod I, Bestle M, Christensen D, Elklit A, Hansen R, et al. A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42(11):1733–43.
24. Kerckhoffs M, Kosasi F, Soliman I, van Delden J, Cremer O, de Lange D, et al. Determinants of self-reported unacceptable outcome of intensive care treatment 1 year after discharge. Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(6):806–14.
25. Jensen J, Thomsen T, Overgaard D, Bestle M, Christensen D, Egerod I. Impact of follow-up consultations for ICU survivors on post-ICU syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(5):763–75.
26. Ato M, López J, Benavente A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. An. Psicol. 2013; 29(3):1038–59.
27. Muñiz J. Introducción a la psicometría: Teoría clásica y TRI. 1st ed. Ediciones Píramide; 2018. 376 p.
28. Roco Á, Hernández M, Silva O. What is the appropriate sample size to validate a questionnaire? Nutr. Hosp. 2021; 38(4):877–8.
29. Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2007; 60(1):34–42.
30. Sánchez R, Echeverry J. Validación de escalas de medición en salud. Rev. Salud Pública. 2004; 6(3):302–18.
31. Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton R. Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema. 2013; 25(2):151–7.
32. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186–91.
33. Agustin T. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Av. Medición. 2008 ;6(1):37–48.
34. Landis J, Koch G. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
35. Hernández-Lalinde J., Espinoza C, Rodríguez J, Chacón R, Toloza S, Arenas T, et al. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Arch. Venez. Farmacol Ter. 2018; 37(5):586–601.
36. Horlait G, Beaudart C, Bougard L, Bornheim S, Colson C, Misset B, et al. Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2022 2; 20(1):59.
37. Monahan P, Boustani M, Alder C, Galvin J, Perkins A, Healey P, et al. Practical clinical tool to monitor dementia symptoms: the HABC-Monitor. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2012; 7:143.
38. Monahan P, Alder C, Khan B, Stump T, Boustani M. The healthy aging brain care (HABC) monitor: Validation of the patient self-report version of the clinical tool designed to measure and monitor cognitive, functional, and psychological health. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014; 9:2123–32.
39. Browne M, Cudeck R. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 1992; 21(2):230–58.
40. Ferrando P, Anguiano-Carrasco C. El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles Psicol. 2010; 31(1):18–33.
41. Morata-Ramirez M, Holgado F, Barbero-García M, Mendez G. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Recomendaciones sobre mínimos cuadrados no ponderados en función del error Tipo I de Ji-Cuadrado y RMSEA. Acción Psicol. 2015; 12(1):79–90
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-09-20 (3)
- 2023-08-23 (2)
- 2023-03-14 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
