This is an outdated version published on 2023-11-03. Read the most recent version.

Use of Research in the Nursing Practice: from Statistical Significance to Clinical Significance

Authors

  • R. Mauricio Barría P.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e12

Keywords:

nursing research, data interpretation, statistical, clinical relevance, nursing, practical, evidence-based practice

Abstract

Objective. Within the context of evidence-based practice, this article exposes the reflection on the understanding and usefulness of the information provided by the research findings shared in reports and research publications, exposing differences based on the interpretation of statistical significance and clinical significance.

Content synthesis. Basic aspects of the meaning and use of the information reported by research on p value (statistical significance) and the value and usefulness of these results are analyzed and exemplified, contrasting the value for the practice of an additional judgment on clinical significance. In addition to establishing conceptual differences, the need is highlighted for nurses to have the competencies to differentiate and apply each of them according to the clinical contexts of their potential implementation.

Conclusion. The real usefulness of research about interventions within the context of nursing care is given by its real application and reach for the practice and benefit for patients. For this to occur, nurses must interpret adequately the information provided by scientific publications and other research reports.

|Abstract
= 1810 veces | HTML
= 0 veces| | PDF
= 655 veces| | FROM PUBMED-CENTRAL
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Barría RM. Nursing Research, Dissemination of Knowledge and its Potential Contribution to the Practice. Invest Educ Enferm. 2022; 40(3):e01.

2 Gray JR. Evolution of research in building evidence-based nursing practice. In: Gray JR, Grove SK, editors. Burns & Grove’s The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 9th Edition. Elsevier. 2020.

3 Visentin DC, Hunt GE. What do the stats mean? Improving reporting of quantitative nursing research. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2017; 26(4):311-3.

4 Hayat MJ, Staggs VS, Schwartz TA, Higgins M, Azuero A, Budhathoki C, et al. Moving nursing beyond p < .05. Nurs. Outlook. 2019; 67(5):509-10.

5 Staggs VS. Pervasive errors in hypothesis testing: Toward better statistical practice in nursing research. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019; 98:87-93.

6 Phillips MR, Wykoff CC, Thabane L, Bhandari M, Chaudhary V. Retina Evidence Trials InterNational Alliance (R.E.T.I.N.A.) Study Group. The clinician's guide to p values, confidence intervals, and magnitude of effects. Eye (Lond). 2022; 36(2):341-2.

7 Mueller M. Using P Values, Why and How? J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020; 47(5):521-2.

8 Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 2012; 4(3):279-82.

9 Polit DF. Clinical significance in nursing research: A discussion and descriptive analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2017; 73:17-23.

10 Bruner S, Corbett C, Gates B, Dupler A. Clinical significance as it relates to evidence-based practice. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl. 2012; 23(2):62-74.

11 Monrroy Uarac M, Barría Pailaquilén M. Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante: Centrando la Toma de Decisiones en el Paciente. Kinesiología. 2022; 41(3):300-4.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-03

Versions

How to Cite

Barría P., R. M. (2023). Use of Research in the Nursing Practice: from Statistical Significance to Clinical Significance. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e12

Issue

Section

REFLECTION ARTICLES / ARTÍCULO DE REFLEXION / ARTIGO DE REFLEXÃO