Factors associated with the health and reproductive autonomy of Quilombola women in Brazil

Authors

  • Gabriela Cardoso Moreira Marques
  • Silvia Lucia Ferreira
  • Eliana do Sacramento de Almeida
  • Paloma Leite Diniz Farias
  • Sânzia Bezerra Ribeiro
  • Edméia de Almeida Cardoso Coelho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n1e10

Keywords:

women, Quilombola communities, reproductive health, socioeconomic survey, personal autonomy, nursing

Abstract

Objective. To verify the association between reproductive autonomy and sociodemographic, sexual, and reproductive characteristics in Quilombola women (a term indicating the origin of politically organized concentrations of Afro-descendants who emancipated themselves from slavery).

Methods. Cross-sectional and analytical study with 160 women from Quilombola communities in the southwest of Bahia, Brazil. Data were collected using the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the questionnaire from the National Health Survey (adapted).

Results. Out of the 160 participating women, 91.9% declared themselves as black, one out of every three were aged ≤ 23 years, 53.8% were married or had a partner, 38.8% had studied for ≤ 4 years, over half (58.1%) were unemployed, only 32.4% had a monthly income > R$ 430 (80 US dollars), 52.5% had their first menstruation at the age of 12, 70.7% had not accessed family planning services in the last 12 months, and over half used some method to avoid pregnancy (59.0%). The women had a high level of reproductive autonomy, especially in the "Decision-making" and "Freedom from coercion" subscales with a score of 2.53 and 3.40, respectively. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between the "Total reproductive autonomy" score and marital status, indicating that single or unpartnered women had higher autonomy compared to married or partnered women.

Conclusion. The association of social determinants of health such as marital status, education, and age impacts women's reproductive choices, implying risks for sexual and reproductive health. The intergenerational reproductive autonomy of Quilombola women is associated with sociodemographic and reproductive factors.

|Abstract
= 539 veces | PDF
= 530 veces| | FROM PUBMED-CENTRAL
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Upadhyay UD, Dworkin SL, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale. Studies in Family Planning. 2014; 45(1): 19-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728- 4465.2014.00374.x

2 Viegas AC, Muniz RM, Zillmer JGV, Santos BP, Cardoso DH, Amaral DED. Autonomy of women for the prevention of breast cancer. Revista de Enfermagem e Atenção à Saúde. 2022; 11(1):e202243. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.18554/reas.v11i1.4786.

3 Osamor PE, Grady C. Factors associated with women's health care decision-making autonomy: empirical evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2018; 50(1):70-85. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932017000037.

4 Neves B, Gregório V, Souza A, Medeiros V, Bezerra S, Galvão E. Caracterização do perfil de mulheres rurais segundo fatores sociodemográficos, laborais e epidemiológicos. Revista Uruguaya de Enfermería. 2022; 17(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.33517/rue2022v17n1a12

5 Loll D, Fleming PJ, Stephenson R, King EJ, Morhe E, Manu A, Hall KS. Factors associated with reproductive autonomy in Ghana. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2020; 17:1-18. DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1710567.

6 Nguyen N, Londeree J, Nguyen LH, Tran DH, Gallo MF. Reproductive autonomy and contraceptive use among women in Hanoi. Vietnam. Contraception: X. 2019; 1:100011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100011.

7 Sousa FLL, Alves RSS, Ribeiro Y, Torres JC, Diaz AO, Rocha FS et al. Assistência de enfermagem frente ao planejamento familiar na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Research, Society and Development. 2021 [cited 2023 jun 27]; 10(1): e 45710110506. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i1.10506

8 Dasa TT, Kassie TW, Roba AA, Wakwoya EB, Kelel HU. Factors associated with long-acting family planning service utilization in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 2019; 4:14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-019-0095-z

9 Borret RH, Araujo DHS, Belford PS, Oliveira DOPS, Vieira RC, Teixeira DS. Reflexões para uma Prática em Saúde Antirracista. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2020; 44 (Suppl 01). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.supl.1-20200405

10 Silva NCC, Mekaro KS, Santos RIO, Uehara SCSA. Conhecimento e prática de promoção da saúde de enfermeiros da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019; 5(73): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0362.

11 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde PNS. Delineamento da PNS [Internet]. 2013 [cited Aug 20] Available from: https://www.pns.icict.fiocruz.br/index.php?pag=delineamento.

12 Fernandes ETBS, Dias ACS, Ferreira SL, Marques GCM, Pereira COJ. Adaptação cultural e confiabilidade da Reproductive Autonomy Scale para mulheres no Brasil. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2019;32(3):298–304. DOI: 10.1590/1982-0194201900041

13 Tadele A, Tesfay A, Kebede A. Factors influencing decision-making power regarding reproductive health and rights among married women in Mettu rural district. south-west. Ethiopia. Reproductive Health. 2019; 16: 155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0813-7

14 Pereira AJL, Mendes CF, Dourado BC, Carmo TR, Rodrigues ALB, Ferreira ALGS et al. Perfil epidemiológico de mulheres que se submeteram à mamografia no Brasil entre 2013 e 2021. Research, Society and Development. 2023; 12(1): e7412138977. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v12i1.38977

15 Barbosa YC, Oliveira AGC, Rabêlo PPC, SILVA FS, Santos AM. Fatores associados à não realização de mamografia: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde. 2013. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. 2019; 22: e190069. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720190069.

16 Costa RC, Gonçalves JR. O direito à saúde, à efetividade do serviço e à qualidade no acesso às políticas públicas de atenção à saúde da mulher. Revista JRG de Estudos Acadêmicos. 2019; 2(4): 119–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4458722

17 Durand MK, Heidemann ITSB. Social determinants of a Quilombola Community and its interface with Health Promotion. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2019; 53:e03451. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2018007703451

18 Theophilo RL, Rattner D, Pereira EL. Vulnerabilidade de mulheres negras na atenção ao pré-natal e ao parto no SUS: análise da pesquisa da Ouvidoria Ativa. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2018; 23(11):3505-3516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182311.31552016

Published

2024-04-02 — Updated on 2024-08-17

Versions

How to Cite

Cardoso Moreira Marques, G., Ferreira, S. L., do Sacramento de Almeida, E., Diniz Farias, P. . L., Bezerra Ribeiro, S., & de Almeida Cardoso Coelho, E. (2024). Factors associated with the health and reproductive autonomy of Quilombola women in Brazil . Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n1e10 (Original work published April 2, 2024)

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES / ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES / ARTIGOS ORIGINAIS