Influencing Factors on the Success of Mobile Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v42n3e09Keywords:
academic success, health education, mobile applications, learningAbstract
Objective. To study the geographical regions, success factors, and types of mobile device features that could result in educational success and early take-up.
Methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and ProQuest databases between 2010 and November 2022. The keywords were m-learning features, practical experiences, and influencing. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used to analyze and combine data.
Results. 48 articles were reviewed in this study. Compatibility and user-friendliness of mobile phones were mentioned as key factors influencing the use of mobile devices in learning. Also, the key role of users’ perspectives, attitudes, and skills as determinant factors of applying mobile technology in the learning process was revealed, which confirms its significant role in the success of m-Learning. Other influencing factors were tools readiness, the availability of appropriate resources, motivation of learners and their active engagement, support, and learning styles which considerably could play a key role in improving the quality of m-learning. Applying different strategies including collaboration, effective interaction, reflection, or inquiry-based learning can be beneficial in improving the success rate of m-learning. The final factor was technical competence which showed a significantly negative correlation with m-learning success according to learners’ perspective. The meta-analysis indicated that most studies on mobile learning were conducted between 2015 and 2021, primarily utilizing quantitative methodologies. These studies focused on young adults and were carried out in various countries, including the United States, Spain, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Turkey, China, Australia, Italy, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Oman, Austria, South Africa, Egypt, India, Portugal, Jordan, South Korea, Iran, Finland, Brazil, and Israel. A meta-analysis identified 23 countries, with the United States having the highest number of studies on mobile learning success factors. Key determinants reported were learning approach and learners’ perception, with estimates of 0.68 (95% CI 0.06-0.98) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.33-0.56), respectively. In contrast, Jordan and Iran had the lowest number of studies, with learning approach being the main contributing success factor from the learners’ perspective, estimated at 0.736 (95% CI 0.68-0.78)
Conclusion. Successful m-learning should include the investigation of trainees’ educational needs and motivation; provision of adequate infrastructure and learning materials; definition of learning objectives and course contents; and coordination of appropriate learning activities in order to ensure continuous progress in learners’ knowledge and awareness on different course topics.
Downloads
References
1. Zengin Ünal Ö. Investigating the use of mobile-based vocabulary notebooks on students’ vocabulary achievement in English language learning: Middle East Technical University; 2015.
2. Tawfik M, Sancristobal E, Martin S, Diaz G, Peire J, Castro M. Expanding the boundaries of the classroom: Implementation of remote laboratories for industrial electronics disciplines. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine. 2013; 7(1):41-9.
3. ELÇİÇEK M. Mobil öğrenme yönetim sisteminin öğrenenlerin akademik başarısı ve tutumları üzerindeki etkisi/Effect of mobile learning management system on academic success and attitudes of learners; 2015.
4. Ling C, Harnish D, Shehab R. Educational apps: using mobile applications to enhance student learning of statistical concepts. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2014; 24(5):532-43.
5. Kukulska-Hulme A, Traxler J. Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers: Psychology press; 2005.
6. Neto P, Williams B, editors. More activity, less lectures: A technology stewardship approach applied to undergraduate engineering learning. 2013 1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE); 2013: IEEE.
7. Chew SW, Cheng I-L, Kinshuk, Chen N-S. Exploring challenges faced by different stakeholders while implementing educational technology in classrooms through expert interviews. Journal of Computers in Education. 2018; 5:175-97.
8. Fu Q-K, Hwang G-J. Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education. 2018; 119:129-43.
9. Ozdamli F, Cavus N. Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 28:937-42.
10. Essary ML. Key external factors influencing successful distance education programs. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 2014; 18(3):121.
11. Brand J, Kinash S, editors. Pad-agogy: A quasi-experimental and ethnographic pilot test of the iPad in a blended mobile learning environment. Proceedings 27th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in learning in Tertiary Education; 2010.
12. Koohestani HR, Arabshahi SKS, Fata L, Ahmadi F. The educational effects of mobile learning on students of medical sciences: A systematic review in experimental studies. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2018; 6(2):58.
13. Strandell-Laine C, Stolt M, Leino-Kilpi H, Saarikoski M. Use of mobile devices in nursing student–nurse teacher cooperation during the clinical practicum: An integrative review. Nurse education today. 2015;35(3):493-9.
14. Mobile Cellular Subscriptions. [Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.CEL.SETS.P2.
15. Gan CL, Balakrishnan V. Enhancing classroom interaction via IMMAP–an interactive mobile messaging app. Telematics and Informatics. 2017; 34(1):230-43.
16. Chaves RO, de Oliveira PAV, Rocha LC, David JPF, Ferreira SC, Santos AdASd, et al. An innovative streaming video system with a point-of-view head camera transmission of surgeries to smartphones and tablets: an educational utility. Surgical Innovation. 2017; 24(5):462-70.
17. Edge D, Fitchett S, Whitney M, Landay J, editors. MemReflex: adaptive flashcards for mobile microlearning. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services; 2012.
18. Lameris AL, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, Eijsvogels TM. The impact of formative testing on study behaviour and study performance of (bio) medical students: a smartphone application intervention study. BMC medical education. 2015; 15(1):1-8.
19. Buchem I, Hamelmann H. Microlearning: a strategy for ongoing professional development. eLearning Papers. 2010; 21(7):1-15.
20. Alrasheedi M, Capretz LF, Raza A. A systematic review of the critical factors for success of mobile learning in higher education (university students' perspective). Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2015; 52(2):257-76.
21. Wang YS, Wu MC, Wang HY. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British journal of educational technology. 2009; 40(1):92-118.
22. Liu Y, Li H, Carlsson C. Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education. 2010 ;55(3):1211-9.
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group* t. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine. 2009; 151(4):264-9.
24. Crompton H. A Historical Overview of M-Learning: Toward Learner-Centered Education Through the study of recent histories, this chapter provides a historical view of the field of electronic learning. The chapter begins by explicating the philosophical, pedagogical, and conceptual underpinnings regarding learning, particularly toward learner-centered pedagogies. This is followed by a discussion of the technology, covering the evolution of the hardware/software, its adoption into society, and how these technological advancements have led to today’s new affordances for learning. Handbook of Mobile Learning: Routledge; 2013. p. 41-52.
25. Pachler N, Bachmair B, Cook J. Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices: Springer; 2009.
26. T U. Evolution and Prospects for the Use of mobile Technologies to Improve Education Access and Learning Outcomes. 2015.
27. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European journal of epidemiology. 2010; 25:603-5.
28. Althunibat A. Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 52:65-71.
29. Briz-Ponce L, Pereira A, Carvalho L, Juanes-Méndez JA, García-Peñalvo FJ. Learning with mobile technologies–Students’ behavior. Computers in human behavior. 2017; 72:612-20.
30. Karimi S. Do learners’ characteristics matter? An exploration of mobile-learning adoption in self-directed learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 63:769-76.
31. Koç T, Turan AH, Okursoy A. Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system in higher education: An empirical study with structural equation modeling. The International Journal of Management Education. 2016; 14(3):286-300.
32. Oberer B, Erkollar A. Mobile learning in higher education: A marketing course design project in Austria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 93:2125-9.
33. Ooi K-B, Hew J-J, Lee V-H. Could the mobile and social perspectives of mobile social learning platforms motivate learners to learn continuously? Computers & Education. 2018; 120:127-45.
34. Parsazadeh N, Ali R, Rezaei M. A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Computers & Education. 2018; 120:75-89.
35. Shorfuzzaman M, Alhussein M. Modeling learners’ readiness to adopt mobile learning: A perspective from a GCC higher education institution. Mobile information systems. 2016; 2016(1):6982824.
36. So S. Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education. 2016; 31:32-42.
37. Cho M-H, Kim Y, Choi D. The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 2017;34.
38. Jones AC, Scanlon E, Clough G. Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education. 2013 ;61:21-32.
39. Molinillo S, Anaya-Sánchez R, Aguilar-Illescas R, Vallespín-Arán M. Social media-based collaborative learning: Exploring antecedents of attitude. Internet and Higher Education. 2018; 38(1):18-27.
40. Reychav I, Wu D. The interplay between cognitive task complexity and user interaction in mobile collaborative training. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 62:333-45.
41. Sánchez-Prieto JC, Olmos-Migueláñez S, García-Peñalvo FJ. MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in human behavior. 2017; 72:644-54.
42. Al-Otaibi HM, AlAmer RA, Al-Khalifa HS. The next generation of language labs: Can mobiles help? A case study. Computers in human behavior. 2016; 59:342-9.
43. Cheon J, Lee S, Crooks S, Song J. An Investigation of Mobile Learning Readiness in Higher Education Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Computers & Education. 2012; 59:1054–64.
44. Gikas J, Grant MM. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education. 2013; 19:18-26.
45. Lin Y-T, Lin Y-C. Effects of mental process integrated nursing training using mobile device on students’ cognitive load, learning attitudes, acceptance, and achievements. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 55:1213-21.
46. Witt RE, Kebaetse MB, Holmes JH, Ryan L-Q, Ketshogileng D, Antwi C, et al. The role of tablets in accessing information throughout undergraduate medical education in Botswana. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2016; 88:71-7.
47. Ekanayake SY, Wishart J. Integrating mobile phones into teaching and learning: A case study of teacher training through professional development workshops. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015; 46(1):173-89.
48. Christensen R, Knezek G. Reprint of Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in human Behavior. 2018; 78:379-88.
49. Lackovic N, Kerry R, Lowe R, Lowe T. Being knowledge, power and profession subordinates: Students' perceptions of Twitter for learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 2017; 33:41-8.
50. Seta L, Kukulska-Hulme A, Arrigo M. What have we learnt about mobile LifeLong Learning (mLLL)? International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2014; 33(2):161-82.
51. Chuang Y-T. SSCLS: A smartphone-supported collaborative learning system. Telematics and Informatics. 2015; 32(3):463-74.
52. Lan Y-F, Tsai P-W, Yang S-H, Hung C-L. Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education. 2012; 59(4):1122-35.
53. Masters K, Ellaway RH, Topps D, Archibald D, Hogue RJ. Mobile technologies in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 105. Medical teacher. 2016; 38(6):537-49.
54. Pimmer C, Brysiewicz P, Linxen S, Walters F, Chipps J, Gröhbiel U. Informal mobile learning in nurse education and practice in remote areas—A case study from rural South Africa. Nurse education today. 2014; 34(11):1398-404.
55. Bellina L, Missoni E. M-learning: mobile phones’ appropriateness and potential for the training of laboratory technicians in limited-resource settings. Health and Technology. 2011; 1:93-7.
56. Gedik N, Hanci-Karademirci A, Kursun E, Cagiltay K. Key instructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project. Computers & Education. 2012; 58(4):1149-59.
57. O'Bannon BW, Thomas KM. Mobile phones in the classroom: Preservice teachers answer the call. Computers & Education. 2015; 85:110-22.
58. Domingo MG, Garganté AB. Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers' perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications' use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 56:21-8.
59. Melero J, Hernández-Leo D, Manatunga K. Group-based mobile learning: Do group size and sharing mobile devices matter? Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 44:377-85.
60. Al-Emran M, Elsherif HM, Shaalan K. Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human behavior. 2016; 56:93-102.
61. Leinonen T, Keune A, Veermans M, Toikkanen T. Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K‐12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016; 47(1):184-202.
62. Lam J, Duan C, editors. A review of mobile learning environment in higher education sector of Hong Kong: Technological and social perspectives. Hybrid Learning: 5th International Conference, ICHL 2012, Guangzhou, China, August 13-15, 2012 Proceedings 5; 2012: Springer.
63. Scott KM, Nerminathan A, Alexander S, Phelps M, Harrison A. Using mobile devices for learning in clinical settings: A mixed‐methods study of medical student, physician and patient perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2017; 48(1):176-90.
64. Kuznekoff JH, Munz S, Titsworth S. Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education. 2015; 64(3):344-65.
65. Felisoni DD, Godoi AS. Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education. 2018; 117:175-87.
66. Jarrahi MH, Nelson SB, Thomson L. Personal artifact ecologies in the context of mobile knowledge workers. Computers in human behavior. 2017; 75:469-83.
67. Sobaih AEE, Moustafa MA, Ghandforoush P, Khan M. To use or not to use? Social media in higher education in developing countries. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 58:296-305.
68. Nayak JK. Relationship among smartphone usage, addiction, academic performance and the moderating role of gender: A study of higher education students in India. Computers & Education. 2018; 123:164-73.
69. Qashou A. Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education. Education and information technologies. 2021; 26(2):1755-85.
70. Al-Rahmi AM, Al-Rahmi WM, Alturki U, Aldraiweesh A, Almutairy S, Al-Adwan AS. Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):7893.
71. Naciri A, Baba M, Achbani A, Kharbach A. Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Unavoidable Alternative during COVID-19. Aquademia. 2020; 4:20016.
72. Thomas MS, Rogers C. Education, the science of learning, and the COVID-19 crisis. Prospects. 2020;49(1-2):87-90.
73. Razzaq A, Samiha YT, Anshari M. Smartphone habits and behaviors in supporting students self-efficacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2018; 13(2).
74. Traxler MJ. Plausibility and verb subcategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. Journal of psycholinguistic research. 2005; 34:1-30.
75. Wang Z, Qadir A, Asmat A, Aslam Mian MS, Luo X. The advent of Coronavirus disease 2019 and the impact of mobile learning on student learning performance: The mediating role of student learning behavior. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12:6550.
76. Mohammad NMN, Mamat MN, Isa PM. M-learning in Malaysia: Challenges and Strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 67:393-401.
77. Yousafzai A, Chang V, Gani A, Noor RM. Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management. 2016; 36(5):784-92.
78. Zhang B, Yin C, David B, Chalon R, Xiong Z. A context‐aware mobile system for work‐based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2016; 24(2):263-76.
79. Crane L, Benachour P, Coulton P. Virtual Learning Environments for mobile learning: Constrained by infrastructural and sociological boundaries? Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences. 2011; 10(1):12-21.
80. Jeno LM, Grytnes J-A, Vandvik V. The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education. 2017; 107:1-12.
81. Mori K, Harada ET. Is learning a family matter?: Experimental study of the influence of social environment on learning by older adults in the use of mobile phones. Japanese Psychological Research. 2010;52(3):244-55.
82. Thomas RL, Fellowes MD. Effectiveness of mobile apps in teaching field-based identification skills. Journal of Biological Education. 2017; 51(2):136-43.
83. Heflin H, Shewmaker J, Nguyen J. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & education. 2017; 107:91-9.
84. Soong MB, Chan HC, Chua BC, Loh KF. Critical success factors for on-line course resources. Computers & education. 2001; 36(2):101-20.
85. Bjekic D, Krneta R, Milosevic D. Teacher education from e-learner to e-teacher: Master curriculum. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET. 2010; 9(1):202-12.
86. Hrastinski S. A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education. 2009; 52(1):78-82.
87. Marković S, Jovanović N. Learning style as a factor which affects the quality of e-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2012; 38(4):303-12.
88. Priem F, De Craemer R, Calu J, Pedreschi F, Zimmer T, Saighi S, et al. E-learning in science and technology via a common learning platform in a lifelong learning project. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. 2011; 14(1).
89. Rau P-LP, Gao Q, Wu L-M. Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education. 2008; 50(1):1-22.
90. Song L, Singleton ES, Hill JR, Koh MH. Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The internet and higher education. 2004; 7(1):59-70.
91. Watkins BR. Developing interactive e‐learning activities. Performance Improvement. 2005; 44(5):5-7.
92. Wagner ED. Realizing the promises of mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2008; 20(2):4-14.
93. Yengin İ, Karahoca D, Karahoca A, Yücel A. Roles of teachers in e-learning: How to engage students & how to get free e-learning and the future. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2):5775-87.
94. Alioon Y, Delialioğlu Ö. A Frame for the Literature on M-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 182:127-35.
95. Kearney M, Burden K, Rai T. Investigating teachers' adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education. 2015; 80:48-57.
96. Lee S, Lee K, Yi S-H, Park HJ, Hong Y-J, Cho H. Effects of parental psychological control on child’s school life: Mobile phone dependency as mediator. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2016; 25:407-18.
97. Nedungadi P, Raman R. A new approach to personalization: integrating e-learning and m-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2012; 60:659-78.
98. Sampson DG, Isaias P, Ifenthaler D, Spector JM. Ubiquitous and mobile learning in the digital age: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
99. Gagne R, Wager W, Golas K, Keller J, Russell J. Principles of Instructional Design. Performance Improvement. 2005; 44:44-6.
Gustafson KL. Survey of instructional development models: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology; 1991.
101. Smaldino SE, Lowther DL, Russell JD. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning: Pearson New International Edition: Pearson Higher Ed; 2013.
102. Richey RC, Klein JD, Tracey MW. The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice: Routledge; 2010.
103. Gary R. Morrison SMR, Jerrold E. Kemp, Howard Kalman. Designing Effective Instruction. 6th edition ed: John Wiley & Sons; 2011 2011.
104. Yueh H-P, Chen T-L, Lin W, Sheen H-J. Developing digital courseware for a virtual nano-biotechnology laboratory: A design-based research approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2014; 17(2):158-68.
105. Clinton G, Hokanson B. Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: the Design/Creativity Loops model. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2012; 60:111-30.
106. Martí MC, Ferrer GT. Exploring learners’ practices and perceptions on the use of mobile portfolios as methodological tool to assess learning in both formal and informal contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 46:3182-6.
107. McQuiggan S, McQuiggan J, Sabourin J, Kosturko L. Mobile learning: A handbook for developers, educators, and learners: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
108. Han SH, Kim KJ, Yun MH, Hong SW, Kim J. Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2004; 14(1):15-29.
109. Pedro LFMG, Barbosa CMMdO, Santos CMdN. A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2018; 15:1-15.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Derechos de propiedad / Direitos de Propriedade
English: If the article is accepted for publication, all copyright will be of exclusive property of Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. The text and the graphics included in the publication are exclusive responsibility of the authors and not necessarily reflect the thought of the Editorial Committee.
Español: Si el artículo es aprobado para publicación, todos los derechos son de propiedad de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. El texto y las gráficas incluidas en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente refleja el pensamiento del Comité Editorial.
Português: Se o artigo for aceito para publicação, todos os direitos autorais serão de propriedade exclusiva de Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. O texto e os gráficos incluídos na publicação são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores e não refletem necessariamente o pensamento do Comitê Editorial.
