Interpreting Risk and Impact Measures in Nursing Research: Implications for Evidence-based Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v44n1e14

Keywords:

nursing research, data interpretation, statistical, measures of association, measures of association, exposure, risk or outcome, nursing, practical, evidence-based practice

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the conceptual foundations, calculation, and interpretation of key risk and impact measures used in nursing research, emphasizing their relevance for evidence-based clinical practice.

Content synthesis. This article reviews measures of risk or association, including relative risk, odds ratio, and hazard ratio, as well as absolute impact measures, such as risk difference, absolute and relative risk reduction, absolute risk increase, and numbers needed to treat and harm. Using examples from recent primary studies conducted in clinically relevant nursing contexts, the manuscript illustrates step-by-step calculations and interpretations, highlighting the complementary roles of relative and absolute measures in clinical decision-making.

Conclusion. An integrated understanding of risk and impact measures is essential for critical appraisal of nursing research and to assess the real clinical relevance of interventions. The combined use of these measures supports more informed, safe, and context-sensitive nursing care decisions, reinforcing evidence-based nursing practice.

|Abstract
= 0 veces | PDF
= 0 veces|

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

R. Mauricio Barría P., Universidad Austral de Chile

RN, MSc. Clinical Epidemiology, DrPH. Institute of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine

References

1. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice, 5th. Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2022.

2. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.

3. Saunders H, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. The state of readiness for evidence-based practice among nurses: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2016; 56:128-40.

4. Skela-Savič B, Gotlib J, Panczyk M, Patelarou AE, Bole U, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, et al. Teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing curricula in six European countries- a descriptive study. Nurse Education Today. 2020; 94:104561.

5. Barría RM. Use of Research in the Nursing Practice: from Statistical Significance to Clinical Significance. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería. 2023; 41(3):e12.

6. Heavey E. Statistics for nursing: a practical approach, 4th. Edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 2024.

7. Stewart A. Basic Statistics and Epidemiology: A Practical Guide, 5th. Edition. CRC Press. 2022.

8. Kestenbaum B. Epidemiology and Biostatistics: An Introduction to Clinical Research, 2nd. Edition. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 2019.

9. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics, 4th. Edition. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc. 2018.

10. Ramadan OME, Alshammari AM, Alruwaili AN, Elsharkawy NB, Alhaiti A, Baraka NIM. Transforming neonatal nursing: a randomized controlled trial comparing kangaroo care and standard protocols for survival in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. BMC Nursing. 2025; 24(1):430.

11. Sakai H, Hirosue M, Iwata M, Terasawa T. The effect of introducing a nurse-practitioner-led peripherally inserted central venous catheter placement program on the utilization of central venous access device: A retrospective study in Japan. The Journal of Vascular Access. 2024; 25(5):1601-1609. doi: 10.1177/11297298231173160

12. Santamaria N, Gerdtz M, Kapp S, Wilson L, Gefen A. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of multi-layer silicone foam dressings for the prevention of pressure injuries in high-risk aged care residents: The Border III Trial. Int Wound J. 2018; 15(3):482-90.

13. Singh R, Kerai S, Bansal V, Bhalotra AR, Saxena KN, Ekka NN, Kikon T, Shetty VK, Raj PM. Effect of oral care protocol with versus without chlorhexidine on mortality of mechanically ventilated patients: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2026; 42(1):30-6.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

How to Cite

Barría P., R. M. (2026). Interpreting Risk and Impact Measures in Nursing Research: Implications for Evidence-based Practice. Investigación Y Educación En Enfermería, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v44n1e14

Issue

Section

REFLECTION ARTICLES / ARTÍCULO DE REFLEXION / ARTIGO DE REFLEXÃO