Estimation of the neuromodulation parameters from the planned volume of tissue activated in deep brain stimulation
Keywords:Deep brain stimulation, planned volume of tissue activated, neuromodulation parameters, support vector machines
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapy with promissory results for the treatment of movement disorders. It delivers electric stimulation via an electrode to a specific target brain region. The spatial extent of neural response to this stimulation is known as volume of tissue activated (VTA). Changes in stimulation parameters that control VTA, such as amplitude, pulse width and electrode configuration can affect the effectiveness of the DBS therapy. In this study, we develop a novel methodology for estimating suitable DBS neuromodulation parameters, from planned VTA, that attempts to maximize the therapeutic effects and to minimize the adverse effects for a patient in treatment. For estimating the continuous outputs (amplitude and pulse width), we use multi-output support vector regression, taking as the input space, the geometry of the VTA. For estimating the electrode polarity configuration, we perform several classification problems, also using support vector machines from the same input space. Our methodology attains satisfactory results for both the regression setting, and for predicting active contacts and its polarity. Combining biological neural modeling techniques together with machine learning, we introduce a promising area of research where parameters of neuromodulation in DBS can be tuned by manually specifying a desired geometric volume.
C. McIntyre, W. Grill, D. Sherman and N. Thakor, “Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition”, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 1457- 1469, 2004.
C. McIntyre and P. Hahn, “Network perspectives on the mechanisms of deep brain stimulation”, Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 329-337, 2010.
R. So, A. Kent and W. Grill, “Relative contributions of local cell and passing fiber activation and silencing to changes in thalamic fidelity during deep brain stimulation and lesioning: a computational modeling study”, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 499-519, 2012.
A. Chaturvedi, C. Butson, S. Lempka, S. Cooper and C. McIntyre, “Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions”, Brain Stimulation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 65-77, 2010.
C. Butson and C. McIntyre, “Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 116, no. 10, pp. 2490-2500, 2005.
C. Butson, S. Cooper, J. Henderson and C. McIntyre, “Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation”, Neuroimage, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 661-670, 2007.
N. Yousif et al., “Evaluating the impact of the deep brain stimulation induced electric field on subthalamic neurons: a computational modelling study”, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 105- 112, 2010.
J. Volkmann, J. Herzog, F. Kopper and G. Deuschl, “Introduction to the programming of deep brain stimulators”, Movement Disorders, vol. 17, pp. 181- 187, 2002.
N. Yousif, R. Borisyuk, N. Pavese, D. Nandi and P. Bain, “Spatiotemporal visualization of deep brain stimulation-induced effects in the subthalamic nucleus”, European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2252-2259, 2012.
A. Chaturverdi, J. Luján and C.McIntyre, “Artificial neural network based characterization of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation”, Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, 2013.
J. Luján, A. Chaturvedi and C. McIntyre, “System and method to estimate region of tissue activation”, U.S. Patent 8589316. Nov. 19, 2013.
Medtronic, DBS Lead Kit for Deep Brain Stimulation, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.medtronic.com/downloadablefiles/UC199901079bEN.pdf. Accessed on: Dec. 16, 2014.
American Association of Neuroscience Nurses (AANN), Care of the Movement Disorder Patient with Deep Brain Stimulation, AANN Clinical Practice Guideline Series, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.aann.org/pdf/cpg/aanndeepbrainstimulation.pdf. Accessed on: Dec. 16, 2014.
F. Rattay, “Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 676-682, 1989.
COMSOL Multiphysics, COMSOL Multiphysics User’s Guide (Version 4.2). Stockholm, Sweden: COMSOL, 2011.
M. Hines and N. Carnevale, “The NEURON simulation environment”, Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1179-1209, 1997.
M. Hines, A. Davison and E. Muller, “NEURON and Python”, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, vol. 3, pp. 1-12, 2009.
T. Zhang and W. Grill, “Modeling deep brain stimulation: point source approximation versus realistic representation of the electrode”, Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, 2010.
C. Butson, C. Maks and C. McIntyre, “Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 447-454, 2006.
D. Kern and N. Framke, Automation of COMSOL Multiphysics Parameter Studies using the MATLAB Livelink, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www-user.tuchemnitz.de/~dker/tutorial_comsol_matlab_livelink.pdf. Accessed on: Dec. 18, 2014.
G. Walckiers, “Bio-electromagnetic model of deep brain stimulation”, Ph.D. dissertation, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2009.
C. McIntyre, A. Richardson and W. Grill, “Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle”, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 995-1006, 2002.
I. Pava et al., “A Gaussian Process Emulator for Estimating the Volume of Tissue Activated During Deep Brain Stimulation”, in 7th Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IbPRIA), Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 2015, pp. 691-699.
F. Pérez et al., “Multi-dimensional function approximation and regression estimation”, in International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN), Madrid, Spain, 2002, pp. 757-762.
M. Sánchez, M. de Prado, J. Arenas and F. Pérez, “SVM multiregression for nonlinear channel estimation in multiple-input multiple-output systems”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2298-2307, 2004.
B. Scholkopf and A. Smola, Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, 1st ed. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2001.
C. Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning, 1st ed. New York, USA: Springer, 2006.
D. Tuia, J. Verrelst, L. Alonso, F. Pérez and G. Camps, “Multioutput support vector regression for remote sensing biophysical parameter estimation”, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 804-808, 2011.
R. Duin et al., PRTools4, A Matlab Toolbox for Pattern Recognition, Delft University of Technology, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.prtools.org/files/PRTools4.1.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 15, 2015.
F. Pérez, MSVR: Multioutput Support Vector Regression. [Online]. Available: http://www.uv.es/gcamps/software.html. Accessed on: Jan. 15, 2015.
J. Pizarro, E. Guerrero and P. Galindo, “Multiple comparison procedures applied to model selection”, Neurocomputing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 155-173, 2002.
F. Bach, “Graph kernels between point clouds”, in 25th international conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland, 2008, pp. 25-32.
S. Vishwanathan, N. Schraudolph, R. Kondor and K. Borgwardt, “Graph kernels”, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 1201-1242, 2010.
How to Cite
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antioquia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. The material published in the journal can be distributed, copied and exhibited by third parties if the respective credits are given to the journal. No commercial benefit can be obtained and derivative works must be under the same license terms as the original work.